@peppyintherain.bsky.social
We all gotta shitpost somewhere
The act of being trans turns into a deceitful and malicious attempt at SA and harm as opposed to someoneβs very being. The mere existence of trans people are seen as a threat that the most radical of these groups will want eradicated.
News story link: www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Shelagh had a few weeks back used the same example of the news story of a nurse being uncomfortable sharing changing rooms with a trans doctor as ground for supporting this claim. The only logic I can read that as is not protecting the erasure of women but instead denying trans being their humanity
16.04.2025 10:19 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0By a disabled and non-disabled woman can be so different in its experience and expression. They donβt fight to define woman as a fully abled person. They should not fight to exclude women of a different experience. Iβd love to know the views on this in the LBC office considering your colleague
16.04.2025 10:19 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0can claim to be acting in defence of their right against what they view as an aggressive invader to their βwomenβs spacesβ. Trans women are not under any delusion. They do not think they are cis women but they are women of a different experience (hence trans). Itβs the same way that the life lived
16.04.2025 10:19 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Trans women are still targeted with bigotry. The lack of reporting on this to police (using their protection as a minority identity) is a knowledge that culturally and systematically trans women are hated. They removed trans health care & now it seems TERFS (Trans exclusionary radical feminist)
16.04.2025 10:19 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@lbc.co.uk @mrjamesob.bsky.social
The biggest fear I have for my trans friends is that this decision will be seen as a victory and opportunity for βprotectedβ discrimination against trans women. Living in Glasgow Iβve heard and witnessed enough to know that regardless of the protections in place
