(1)conflict with the best interests of an individual;
(2)take advantage of or otherwise exploit an individual;
(3)result in a disproportionate risk to an individual;
(4)are to an individual's detriment; or
(5)cause harm to an individual."
@christophera.bsky.social
Blockchain & Decentralized Identity Architect — Internet Cryptography Pioneer — Co-author IETF TLS 1.0 & W3C DID 1.0 Security Standards — Collaborative Tools & Patterns
(1)conflict with the best interests of an individual;
(2)take advantage of or otherwise exploit an individual;
(3)result in a disproportionate risk to an individual;
(4)are to an individual's detriment; or
(5)cause harm to an individual."
"**Duty of loyalty** The department, a digital wallet provider, a verifier, a relying party, and a digital guardian shall refrain from practices or activities related to the processing of an individual's identity attributes that: …
10.02.2026 00:05 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0But it is the addition of "Duty of Loyalty", which like Wyoming's "Principal Authority" evokes agency law, which as I understand it (but IANAL) makes it hard to use contract law to abrogate these duties…
10.02.2026 00:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0👍 The new Utah #SEDI draft SB0275 has the essence of my first #SSI principle that I wrote 10 years ago:
"(1) An individual possesses an individual identity innate to the individual's existence and independent of the state, which identity is fundamental and inalienable."
le.utah.gov/~2026/bills/...
Next year it’ll be 10 years since @christophera.bsky.social wrote The Path to Self-Sovereign Identity along with a definition and 10 principles of SSI.
A group is now being convened to refine these principles. Hope to see some atproto folks get involved here, including @bnewbold.net & co.
Support our work to create infrastructure that can't be taken from us. Become a GitHub Sponsor of Blockchain Commons. Help us build autonomous infrastructure for coordination, collaboration, and identity beyond Bitcoin. [19/19] github.com/sponsors/Blo...
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0These aren't Bitcoin-specific features. They're the architecture of autonomy itself. QR codes, Bluetooth, threshold signatures, Gordian Envelope, XIDs. Technologies that enable Exodus Protocols for coordination, identity, and collaboration beyond value transfer. [18/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0A journalist stores sources in a Gordian Club. One permit for their key, SSKR shares to their editors. Even if seized, encrypted information is protected. A protest group coordinates when messaging app becomes surveillance. Immigrants have credentials with no phone-home. [17/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Gordian Clubs use a permit system where different people access the same content different ways: private keys, XIDs, or secret shares. Multiple permits mean resilience. Transport neutral: internet, thumb drive, QR code in a newspaper, even @Blockstream Satellite. [16/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Gordian Clubs shows these principles: an “Exodus Protocol” built on Autonomous Cryptographic Objects—self-contained, cryptographically secure, resilient when infrastructure fails. Unencrypted data isn’t safe; centralized servers aren’t reliable. [15/19] www.blockchaincommons.com/musings/musi...
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Principle 5: work offline and across time. Bitcoin transactions can be signed offline and broadcast later. The protocol doesn't care about internet connectivity for core operations. True autonomy works with whatever channels remain available when coercion denies others. [14/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Principle 4: preserve exit through portability. Bitcoin keys work in any wallet. Open protocol means freedom to switch implementations. Without the ability to walk away, consent collapses into coercion. Lock-in is the opposite of sovereignty. [13/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Principle 3: make constraints load-bearing. Bitcoin can’t reverse transactions, so your funds can’t be seized by fiat. Rule changes require consensus, so your holdings can’t be inflated away. What can’t be changed can’t be weaponized. [12/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Principle 2: encode rules in mathematics, not policy. Math doesn’t discriminate, take sides, or change under pressure. Cryptographic proof replaces administrative decision-making: verification is deterministic. Code can be coerced, but mathematics cannot. [11/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Principle 1: operate without external dependencies. If it requires permission to operate, it's not autonomous. If it stops working when a company fails or a government objects, it's infrastructure built on sand. We need self-contained cryptographic objects. [10/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0In my new Musings article, I lay out five principles required to build Exodus Protocols. They define what makes infrastructure truly autonomous and resilient against centralized control or sudden disappearance. [9/19] www.blockchaincommons.com/musings/musi...
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Unfortunately Bitcoin only creates an Exodus Protocol for value transfer. We need the same architectural patterns for coordination, collaboration, and identity. We need to protect activists, empower journalists, enable disaster response, preserve long-term archives. [8/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Bitcoin is an Exodus Protocol: a system that frees us from external control by creating infrastructure without infrastructure. Miners can come and go. Transactions can be signed air-gapped and transferred using QR codes. It's generally hard to censor, unthinkable to kill. [7/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Bitcoin demonstrated something profound: fundamental capabilities can exist as mathematical rights rather than centralized privileges. When your ability to transact depends on a bank's approval, it's not a right but permission. Bitcoin restored transaction as a right. [6/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0So how do we create digital infrastructure that can't be taken from us? Bitcoin answered that question. For fifteen years it has demonstrated autonomous infrastructure that works. No servers to shut down, no administrators to pressure, no companies whose failure matters. [5/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0By now everyone has a story of infrastructural loss. Google Plus circles. Internet radio. MP3s. This pattern has a name: #enshittification. A service becomes essential, companies collect rent, reduce features, increase surveillance, then kill it when profits fade. [4/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Advocacy and activist groups blockaded by Visa, Mastercard, or PayPal without charge or trial. Platforms locking out regions citing “legal risk.” Canadian truckers with frozen accounts, professionals losing workspaces overnight. Access became permission. [3/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0A decade ago my students lost their collaborative learning infrastructure overnight when Yahoo sold del.icio.us and Google killed Reader. No warning. No migration. Gone. A story of the systematic transformation of rights into revokable privileges. [2/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0What would it mean to build infrastructure that can’t fail you? Not one that never has problems, but where someone else can't make it unavailable to you? Where fundamental capabilities exist as rights, not revokable privileges? For this, we need “Exodus Protocols” 🧵… [1/19]
30.10.2025 18:15 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0And talk to me directly if you'd like to work with us on Gordian Clubs, Hubert, Provenance Marks, or any of the rest of our Gordian autonomy technology stack! [13/13]
24.10.2025 20:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Support Blockchain Commons and this work by becoming a financial sponsor. [12/13] github.com/sponsors/Blo...
24.10.2025 20:46 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0All of that and more is detailed in the newest quarterly report from @blockchaincomns. [11/13] www.blockchaincommons.com/quarterlies/...
24.10.2025 20:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0You also might want to take a look at our frost-verify tool for checking FROST signatures (specialized for ZF FROST signing). [10/13] github.com/BlockchainCo...
24.10.2025 20:46 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0We'll have more on this in a Learning FROST from the Command Line course that we started work on this quarter and will finish up this fall. [9/13] github.com/BlockchainCo...
24.10.2025 20:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Finally, we made some real progress on FROST work funded by @HRF. If you want to send Bitcoins with a FROST signature, you now can! [8/13] developer.blockchaincommons.com/meetings/202...
24.10.2025 20:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0