An interesting post for our new paper.
We infer the initial density profile of the dark matter halo of the Galaxy from the Gaia rotation curve, assessing the adiabatic compression that would be induced by plausible baryonic mass models. The data want a primordial halo with a core & rapid outer fall-off, unlike NFW as expected in LCDM.
Here is the press release.
Please check the great summary of our new paper, inferring the primordial dark matter halos from observations.
New press release about our new paper led by my PhD student Mariana Pouseiro Júlio! 🔭🧪☄️
English version here: www.aip.de/en/news/dark...
Paper day! My PhD student Mariana Júlio, with @readdark.bsky.social, @pengfeili.bsky.social and others, studies the internal dynamics of dwarf galaxies and finds they don't agree with the Radial Acceleration Relation, challenging the dark matter alternative MOND.
arxiv.org/abs/2510.06905
🔭☄️🧪
1/7
Jamie‘s new Nature Astronomy paper on how M31‘s satellite galaxy system is much more asymmetric than typically expected from cosmological simulations is now out on the arXiv, too. 🔭
arxiv.org/abs/2504.08047
This project is in collaboration with the great eROSITA cluster team led by @esrabulbul.bsky.social and many excellent collaborators including @8minutesold.bsky.social.
Finally, we check the radial acceleration relation established in galaxies. The three independent mass proxies consistently lead to higher total accelerations than predicted by the RAR. So the discrepancy in clusters seems to be a true problem for the universality of the RAR.
Still, the wl-inferred mass is higher than hydrostatic mass by 110% on average. This might be the reason why the latest eRASS1 measurements of sigma_8 present a much higher value than previous estimates. Certainly, we need to run the full cosmological pipeline to confirm.
However, this is not the right comparison for cosmological purpose. Because when measuring sigma_8 using different cluster mass proxies, one would use their own total mass within their own R500. So here is the right comparison.
We also compared our mass estimates with that inferred from weak lensing in Ghirardini et al. (2024). To be fair, we calculated the hydrostatic mass within the same radius as that for weak lensing. We found that weak lensing inferred masses are significantly higher.
There seems to be a trend that the dynamical-to-hydrostatic mass ratio decreases with increasing radius, which might be evidence that galaxies in the outskirts are accreting toward the centers of clusters. But we need more statistics to confirm.
We then compared these two mass proxies. Statistically, there is no significant difference. But at small radii, cluster galaxies provide higher mass estimates than X-ray emitting gas, while at large radii the difference becomes smaller.
Notice that the slope is 1.296 instead of 1, because there is a radial evolution. The rms scatter is only 0.14 dex. This relation can be viewed as a simplified Jeans equation. It can be used to quickly estimate the total enclosed mass.
By numerically solving the Jeans equation for the kinematics of member galaxies, we derived their cumulative dynamical masses at some discrete radii. We determined the spatially resolved mass-velocity dispersion relation: log(M_dyn) = 1.296 * log(sigma_los^2 * r_proj/G) - 3.87.
From the eROSITA X-ray data, we derived electron number density profiles, temperature profiles, gas mass profiles, and hydrostatic mass profiles. These data are all made public and the link is shared in the paper.
The cluster galaxies are from Kluge et al. (2024), which compiled many different catalogs from the literature. Eventually, we retain 22 clusters that have sufficient number of galaxy spectra for robust statistics.
In this paper, we aim to compare two mass proxies for galaxy clusters: cluster galaxies and intracluster medium. So we need both X-ray data and sufficient number of galaxy spectra. We selected clusters from the latest eRASS1 cluster catalog by Bulbul et al. (2024).
#Paperday New paper accepted by A&A on the mass measurements and comparisons for eROSITA clusters is available at arxiv.org/abs/2411.09735. One result that might be particularly useful is the spatially resolved mass-velocity dispersion relation. A thread summarizes the paper.
Now out: Episode 3 of the dwarf galaxies and cosmology video series produced by AIP PhD students Mariana P. Júlio and Jamie K. Kanehisa. This one interviews Paris Observatory's Yanbin Yang and AIP's Humboldt Fellow @pengfeili.bsky.social on the topic of Dark Matter.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6IU...
Check out Ep2 of the interview series on dwarf galaxies, the Local Group & cosmology, shot at our IAU symposium. 🔭🧪 This one interviews the fantastic Tony Sohn about measuring the motion of galaxies. Produced by AIP PhD students J.K. Kanehisa & M.P. Júlio +@pengfeili.bsky.social youtu.be/vTAbQw78GIE
Want to learn about astrophysics from international experts? 🔭🧪 Check out this new series of interviews shot at our IAU Symposium #IAUS379. The first video on "Dwarf Galaxies" featuring the fantastic @runningastronomer.bsky.social is online now (next one in January):
www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQJI...
Yeah. Would Iike to enjoy the blue and sunny sky.
