Dr Nick Dickinson

Dr Nick Dickinson

@nickdickinson.bsky.social

Political Scientist | British Politics and History | PhD on political salaries (Exeter) | Mst. Modern British and European History (Oxford) | DMs closed, email me @n.dickinson3@exeter.ac.uk

1,467 Followers 814 Following 1,761 Posts Joined Oct 2023
8 hours ago
Preview
Academia is dead; Long live academia! Six steps towards unlocking a more optimistic AI-empowered future for academia and science

AI-empowered research is here, and it's going to break the peer review system. What can we actually do about it?
daafguide.substack.com/p/a-better-a...

#academicsky #highered #academicchatter #PhDChat #phdsky #econsky

2 2 1 2
6 hours ago

Imagine the incentive this provides to a less principled journalist

0 0 0 0
6 hours ago

Die Another Day tried to warn us

0 0 0 0
6 hours ago
0 1 0 0
7 hours ago
Video thumbnail
1 0 0 0
7 hours ago

The right answer of course being "sheer curiosity about who is marrying that guy"

0 0 0 0
10 hours ago
Post image

New proposal
(with thanks to @eastprospekt on X)

486 87 26 4
12 hours ago

Can this be a solution?

351 95 14 11
11 hours ago

Honestly we can’t be far away from “buy war bond token (WB$) to support our brave boys overseas”

1 0 0 0
11 hours ago
3 1 0 0
1 day ago

Not breaking down national popularity by party in US statistics should be a crime against the use of ggplot

0 0 0 0
1 day ago

It's also fundamentally unsuited for this purpose. It's meant to work for a President who is actually incapacitated, not one who would immediately fire his whole cabinet and take it to the Supreme Court.

1 0 0 0
1 day ago

Better put here: bsky.app/profile/sund...

1 0 1 0
1 day ago

Proximate factor: Brexit is very unpopular with younger voters.

General factors: higher than average ethnic diversity, large degree-educated group, clustering of both in growing urban population, and poor economic outcomes of these groups since 2009 make left-populism on economics more attractive.

7 1 1 0
1 day ago

Note to self, re-play Spec Ops: The Line soon

0 0 0 0
1 day ago

Critical theory PhD student who's big on TikTok, apparently. We can only hope Matt will receive the appropriate amount of respect from a "junior colleague"

1 0 0 0
1 day ago
0 0 0 0
1 day ago

It’s gonna be *physically painful* to watch Genevieve O'Reilly’s Mon Mothma in Ashoka after Andor S2.

1 0 0 0
2 days ago

What they will actually do is have them win but then the First Order will happen anyway unrelatedly, rendering both this and the OT entirely pointless as stories because the Empire just comes back again off screen every time.

10 0 2 1
2 days ago

The really funny thing is they technically have to explain in this film and Ashoka S2 how the Empire is back (for all intents and purposes) by TFA with an even bigger super weapon as a result of JJ making this same mistake. But they can’t because it would mean Ashoka and the gang have to lose hard.

21 0 2 3
2 days ago

Rumsfeld: fails at post-war planning

Hegseth: *hold my beer* (literally)

Fails to plan for actual war

1 0 0 0
2 days ago

It's not about how much stock you have, it's about how many GPUs you can get out of the building with

1 0 0 0
2 days ago

PhD Studentship Political Science #ECPRMemberJobs
📅 Four-year doctoral programme
🏫 @tcdpoliticalsci.bsky.social
⌛ Wed 1 April
buff.ly/E1PBbuT
#PolSciJobs #PoliSky #AcademicSky

3 3 0 0
2 days ago

lol

1 0 0 0
2 days ago

Deeply Trump-like reaction too. Similar to how he describes random people and organizations as having "ratings" as if they were TV shows

2 0 1 0
2 days ago

the most thoroughly vindicated man in hollywood.

trade disputes and conspiracies ✔️

republic subverted over sex hangups ✔️

“sand people” killed, royalty indifferent ✔️

naive idiot casts vote for tyranny ✔️

villains with silly names like “dooku” ✔️

powerful clerical order screwing up ✔️

list goes on

5,745 1,407 41 16
3 days ago

Like it actually was this because the candidate on one side was just imposed at the last minute because it was the only option and Kang was worse. bsky.app/profile/cmon...

0 0 0 0
3 days ago

It’s like everyone forgot that this wasn’t a normal process at all and it’s the same debate as “Bernie would have won” when the situation is fundamentally different.

0 0 1 0
3 days ago

I have trouble understanding how the lack of primaries in 2024 is something both sides don’t see as central to this pointless debate. You can’t concretely say either “the Dems are just the same as the GOP” or “this wouldn’t be happening under the Democrats” because nobody got to see that debate.

0 0 1 0
3 days ago

Really interesting. My sense even then was, in addition to its immediate goals, PV represented a kind emotional catharsis especially if you sat out the initial campaign. But it also formed a more confident liberal identity in the U.K. you still see now across Green and Lib Dem voters especially.

1 0 1 0