Morgan

Well, whenever I get around to making it, I’ll make sure to post about it here!

Mmmm, I think so too! I’m surprised someone hasn’t already made it for CS1, but I think I’ll give it a go :)

You can almost think of it as the precursor to the current GO Expansion, albeit on a smaller scale and without heavy rail.

To me, it’s almost like if Toronto decided to build a 1980s version of Montreal’s REM

It’s the GO-ALRT! It’s a cancelled rail vehicle based on the rolling stock used on the now-defunct TTC Scarborough Line 3.

Basically, in the 1980s, GO Transit was floating the idea of building a system of electric rapid transit service leading to Hamilton and Oshawa (like a modern interurban)

A picture of the cancelled GO-ALRT vehicle that I found on the internet.

I’m either gonna make a building from Toronto’s harbourfront or this thing:

I think one of my smaller New Year’s resolutions for 2025 is gonna be to actually make and release a couple asset mods for CS1 before the end of the year

A picture of two dishes I made for a potluck. On the left is a Tupperware container with chocolate crinkle cookies, and on the right is a metal party dish with Chicken a la King.

Potluck tonight!!!

I made chocolate crinkle cookies and Chicken a la King (which’ll be served on toasted brioche bread) 😇

RELEASED: Frisco Meteor Long and Short Consist. Took a lot of time remodeling the passenger cars and locomotives for this.
#CitiesSkylines
Frisco Meteor 1948 Consist
steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/...
Frisco Meteor Short Consist
steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/...

They DO but it’s in the asset editor. The roads I’ve got here are all ones from the workshop :)

Yeahhhh lmao, I installed extra ram JUST for CS1

Lmao fr, it eats up so much RAM 😭

I promise I’ll share it later today!!!

An intersection from the same city in #CitiesSkylines, now more developed ☺️

Yeah it’s just heavily modded hehe

this is actually Cities Skylines 1!

trainsssss 🥰

Express and local trains for my new #CitiesSkylines build :)

I GOT A JOB OFFER 🥹

give it a couple years for them to electrify this line, and I’ll be NYOOMIN even more 🤭

she’s on the GOoooooo

yeah fr, I love how much my style and all that has grown this year

hehehe, thank you. They say it takes one to know one ;)

u r also so hot

Thank you!!! I’m keeping my fingers crossed 🤞🏽

also, been quiet on here (and socials in general lately) because I’m really close to landing a job!!! 🥹

mirror selfie wrapped 2024 :))

then again, when said government is willing to throw $225 million for the sake of getting liquor sold outside of the Beer Store/LCBO, it’s not exactly surprising

I just wish we had a government that ACTUALLY focused on real issues, like the housing shortage

The Ford government is *really* laying it on thick as to how little they care about providing transparency when it comes to the data they’re supposedly using to inform their decisions (see below and also the figures being thrown around for bike use %)

With regard to the Ministry being the approval agency for the implementation of cycling infrastructure, OPPI is concerned that this approach may not improve efficiency and is counter to streamlining the approvals process. More specifically: • Developments have been approved with assumptions around multi-modal travel including the completion of numerous traffic impact studies. These developments may be delayed as a result of additional time and effort that needs to be spent by ministry staff to determine the appropriateness of those systems.

Affordability: Automobile ownership is unaffordable for many, especially when considering the increasing costs of other necessities including housing and food. Cycling provides an affordable mode of transportation, particularly for those who do not drive cars due to age, income, or ability. Equity: Providing safe streets for all users is fundamental to ensuring equity in mobility. Historically, streets have been designed with a ‘vehicle-centric’ focus. Better protecting vulnerable street users, including people who cycle, improves equity for all modes. It also improves equity for people who do not have access to other modes, for whatever reason (including financial, age, disability, not having a driver’s license, lack of viable transit options, etc.). Lifestyle Decisions: Many Ontarians are also choosing to use bikes and e-scooters as an active lifestyle choice for all or select day to day trips. This isn’t about the economic opportunity as many of these individuals come from a wide range of economic backgrounds. They are selecting to choose alternate modes of transportation over vehicles for personal ethos reasons. In many municipalities, new housing such as condominium apartments and rental buildings are built without parking, meaning that transit and micromobility options are the primary ways that people travel.

Policy Conflicts: New Provincial Planning Statement: The Provincial Planning Statement (2024) establishes policies with which land use and infrastructure planning decisions must be consistent. Section 3.2 details policies for Transportation Systems, which include facilitating the safe and energy efficient movement of people and goods (policy 3.2.1), making efficient use of existing infrastructure including transportation demand management strategies (policy 3.2.1), and creating a multimodal transportation system (policy 3.2.3). New Housing Units: The Ontario government is focused on unlocking 1.5 million homes over a 10-year period. Many of these homes will be in large urban areas with already strained road capacity. Removing or slowing down the implementation of bike lanes will increase congestion and reduce the viability of many potential housing developments as studies will indicate that the road capacity cannot accommodate a significant increase in users in many situations, barring transportation alternatives such as increase in road capacity due to separated bike lanes

Removal of Parking Minimums in PMTSAs: Ontario’s Bill 185, the Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act, 2024 not only removed parking minimums in Protected Major Transit Station Areas (PMTSAs), it prohibited Official Plans and Zoning Bylaws from requiring an owner to provide and maintain vehicular parking, an ambitious decision which will result in more homes near transit which rely upon alternative transportation modes including cycling. Notably, bicycle parking was specifically exempted from this provision. The City of Toronto has proposed several PMTSAs under OPA 570 that includes ones with existing bike lanes that the Province is proposing to remove. To support the Bill 185 policy, it is imperative that cycling infrastructure be kept and/or provided as an alternative to driving as parking for cars will become less frequently available.

An absolute banger from the Ontario Professional Planners Institute outlining how Bill 212 will make affect cities, including that it adds inefficiency, mucks with housing plans and isn't in line with the Planning Act (which was just updated). ontarioplanners.ca/inspiring-kn...

Fr!!! Plus it’ll be joined by commuter trains and metro. I might also try to do a tram-train system for some parts of the city, although I might also just save that for another city in the future