's Avatar

@mjmae.bsky.social

19 Followers  |  20 Following  |  3 Posts  |  Joined: 27.01.2025  |  1.5425

Latest posts by mjmae.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image

Spot on from @chrismurphyct.bsky.social

05.02.2025 07:25 — 👍 35591    🔁 9213    💬 905    📌 499
Post image

Got the broom. Need the sword. #HexTheFascists
#BedknobsAndBroomsticks

21.01.2025 02:21 — 👍 17    🔁 7    💬 0    📌 0
Tweet from redbeardrn reads: "The "Lock her up" / "but her emails" crowd is really silent as Elon Musk ravages through federal computer systems with private hard drives. The tweet has 23k likes and 228 comments.

Tweet from redbeardrn reads: "The "Lock her up" / "but her emails" crowd is really silent as Elon Musk ravages through federal computer systems with private hard drives. The tweet has 23k likes and 228 comments.

This is NOT NORMAL. No one voted for Elon.
Show up at your state capitol tomorrow to protest: www.reddit.com/r/50501/
#Resist

05.02.2025 04:05 — 👍 661    🔁 132    💬 17    📌 1

"We cannot fix everything by fighting back, but we won’t fix anything unless we try." ~ Ezra Levin (Indivisible) #resistsky

05.02.2025 17:02 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

100% worth the watch. Do not give up. Every small act matters.

04.02.2025 23:27 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

THIS.

02.02.2025 15:19 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Manu Raju on Twitter: “Cassidy could single-handedly derail the nomination by voting NO in committee. He hasn’t said how he would vote.”

Manu Raju on Twitter: “Cassidy could single-handedly derail the nomination by voting NO in committee. He hasn’t said how he would vote.”

Stephen Hayes on Twitter: “Senator John Curtis sat in on Tulsi Gabbard's hearing today despite the fact that he's not on the Intel Committee. He tells @TheDispatch he leaves with "more questions than answers" and says "her responses, and non-responses, created more confusion than clarity and only deepened my concerns about her judgement and what that will mean in this vital role."”

Stephen Hayes on Twitter: “Senator John Curtis sat in on Tulsi Gabbard's hearing today despite the fact that he's not on the Intel Committee. He tells @TheDispatch he leaves with "more questions than answers" and says "her responses, and non-responses, created more confusion than clarity and only deepened my concerns about her judgement and what that will mean in this vital role."”

Andrew Desiderio on Twitter: “Asked Sen. Lankford (R-Okla.) what he thought of Gabbard not calling Snowden a traitor after he set it up for her “Kinda surprised. I thought that was gonna be an easy softball question” Problem for her confirmation prospects? “I think there are a lot of questions after it, yeah””

Andrew Desiderio on Twitter: “Asked Sen. Lankford (R-Okla.) what he thought of Gabbard not calling Snowden a traitor after he set it up for her “Kinda surprised. I thought that was gonna be an easy softball question” Problem for her confirmation prospects? “I think there are a lot of questions after it, yeah””

Andrew Desiderio on Twitter: “Lankford had previously said he supports her confirmation. This seems to be in doubt now.”

Andrew Desiderio on Twitter: “Lankford had previously said he supports her confirmation. This seems to be in doubt now.”

We have a chance to defeat some of Trump’s most dangerous nominees.

But that’s not going to happen unless your senators hear from you: nixthenoms.com?source=bluesky

02.02.2025 13:08 — 👍 509    🔁 221    💬 28    📌 10

@mjmae is following 18 prominent accounts