Das wird immer wieder weltweit bestätigt, hier aktuell bei uns in 🇩🇪: die Mehrheit der Menschen wünscht sich mehr Klimaschutz!
Denn wir haben die Lösungen, aber wir verlieren gerade den Wettlauf gegen die Zeit für eine lebenswerte Zukunft.
table.media/berlin/news/...
⭐ After quite some time in the making, I’m excited to share our new paper!🌿⭐
We examined people's climate-relevant behaviors (driving, air travel, public transport use, and meat consumption) and their perceptions of how feasible it would be to change them (+ expected wellbeing impacts).
🧵(1/4)
This is what democracy looks like. #NoKings
18.10.2025 23:22 — 👍 88996 🔁 28845 💬 2306 📌 1843
provide a behavioral perspective which may support policymakers in co-designing effective and fair structural solutions to sustainability problems. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
11.10.2025 10:55 — 👍 3 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0Further robust evidence suggesting green nudges at the individual level are unlikely to make a difference. As we recently suggested, it is time to abandon the prevailing success focus and rather think of this body of evidence as pointing to the many structural constraints people are facing, and
11.10.2025 10:55 — 👍 10 🔁 9 💬 1 📌 0Wondering about how to promote healthy eating in daily life? New research reveals it's not just about willpower, but about which strategy you use, and what you target. 1/9
02.10.2025 12:12 — 👍 3 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0
At the Department of Political Science (University of Amsterdam, @uva-fmg.bsky.social), we are looking for a new Assistant Professor to join our team. Interested? You can find all details and apply here: werkenbij.uva.nl/en/vacancies....
25.09.2025 13:14 — 👍 59 🔁 67 💬 2 📌 4
Im Bundeskanzleramt zeigte sich beim Behavioural Insights Connect: Wenn Wissenschaft & Politik in den Dialog treten, entstehen neue Wege, um Demokratie wirksam & erfahrbar zu machen. Unsere Policy Ultra Briefs sollen dabei einen nachhaltigen Beitrag zur evidenzbasierten Politikgestaltung leisten. 💬
22.09.2025 16:32 — 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Für Klimaschutz & Austausch: Die DGPs zeigt in einer neuen Handreichung, wie Veranstaltungen nachhaltig gelingen – von Mobilität über Verpflegung bis Abfallreduktion. Präsenz & Ökologie im Einklang 👉 www.dgps.de/schwerpunkte...
10.09.2025 09:55 — 👍 14 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 0Happy thanks to everyone joining and contributing to #FGSP2025 and safe travels back👋, we hope you had a stimulating time! And thanks so much to @olivergenschow.bsky.social and colleagues at @leuphana.bsky.social for organizing the next biannual meeting🙏 - looking forward to #FGSP2027!
17.09.2025 09:51 — 👍 17 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Welcome to Bochum everyone! 🩷 We’re thrilled to see so many of you at the 19th conference of the Social Psychology Section — ready to share ideas, connect, and maybe even fall in love with a little brutalist concrete charm 🧱✨ #FGSP2025
14.09.2025 07:22 — 👍 29 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0
We always get asked, "What can I *personally* do to help address climate change?"
Sadly, there hasn't been a very good answer to this question. Previous guides often treated people as monoliths, giving them a one-size-fits-all answer.
But that's changed now. Enter SHIFT.
jointheshift.earth
We are getting ready for 3 days of #FGSP2025 at @ruhr-uni-bochum.de with > 300 contributions! looking forward to learning about the latest research in social psych - safe travels to Bochum everyone!🚄
13.09.2025 15:31 — 👍 16 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Review alert 🚨 What motivates collective action for the environment? 🔎🌍
We reviewed 27 publications to identify the proximal predictors of environmental collective action.
Here are our key findings:
We're hiring TWO social psychologists (one health, one any area of social) at U of Utah! Pls share widely, and reach out if you have any questions! utah.peopleadmin.com/postings/186...
05.09.2025 16:52 — 👍 45 🔁 42 💬 0 📌 1
📢Öffentliches Wissenschaftsevent @ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Psychologische Einblicke in Verschwörungserzählungen
Mit @rolandimhoff.bsky.social, @pialamberty.bsky.social, @lpummerer.bsky.social, @tobiasrothmund.bsky.social & Bianca Liebrand
Bergbau-Museum Bochum
14.9.25, 18:00
Tickets: 5€ tinylink.net/VbOF9
🚨 We’re hiring! 🚨
The Social&Environmental Psychology Group @ruhr-uni-bochum.de is recruiting 2 PhDs and 1 Postdoc
as part of the ERC-funded SUSCON project on sustainable consumption.
Details here:
PhDs:👉 jobs.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/jobposting/7...
Postdoc:👉 jobs.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/jobposting/e...
🙌Big thanks to an amazing team: @corneliabetsch.bsky.social, @robertboehm.bsky.social, Denise de Ridder, Stefan Drews, @bewert.bsky.social, Ralph Hertwig, @fsniehotta.bsky.social, & Jutta Mata
full-text view-only-link here: rdcu.be/ex8hR
Accordingly, we advocate for a broader role for behavioral science in public policy - a role that also includes diagnosing structural constraints, co-designing structural solutions, and helping overcome barriers to structural policy support.
28.07.2025 10:38 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Fig. 1 | A comparison of success-focused and holistic interpretations for behavioural intervention outcomes as a function of the magnitude of underlying structural constraints
We propose a more holistic view-one that recognizes the diagnostic potential and policy relevance of unsuccessful behavioral interventions. When behavior change fails despite good design, it often points to deeper structural constraints. These failures may justify stronger, systemic policy measures.
28.07.2025 10:38 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Igniting a fire in a wet environment is hard, isn't it? 🔥🌧️
Likewise, even the best-designed interventions struggle in everyday settings where choice environments are structurally misaligned with policy goals, such as in areas like reducing obesity or carbon emissions.
Comment: Rethinking behavior change interventions in policymaking
📢 New commentary out today in Nature Human Behaviour!
We argue that behavior change interventions often suffer from a one-sided success focus. But failures may reveal structural barriers people face.
🔗 rdcu.be/ex8hR
#BehavioralScience #PublicPolicy
📣Wisskomm-Interessierte in Bochum und Umgebung aufgepasst: dieses öffentliche Wissenschafts-Event zu Verschwörungserzählungen im Rahmen der Fachgruppentagung Sozialpsychologie solltet ihr euch nicht entgehen lassen! #FGSP2025
22.07.2025 11:34 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0🪧New Preprint led by @saschakuhn.bsky.social on the connection between climate policy support and macro- (country-level) variation in e.g., economic freedom, per capita emissions, income inequality, and climate vulnerability, building on data from the Many Labs Climate Project!
21.07.2025 10:49 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 010 days left to apply to join #HPGVienna @univie.ac.at ⬇️ perfect position for a post-PhD ambulatory assessment/ ecological momentary assessment resesrcher with an interest in determinants of health behaviours and #digitalhealth! #PsychJobs #HealthPsych #BehSci #AcademicSky
17.07.2025 05:39 — 👍 4 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0
Schade, dass wir uns mehr Klimaschutz nicht leisten können, weil dafür muss erst die Wirtschaft laufen, und die läuft halt nicht so gut, unter anderem, weil es mit dem Klima nicht so läuft.
13.07.2025 11:01 — 👍 1616 🔁 470 💬 41 📌 23
Das Deutschlandticket ist für viele junge Menschen zu teuer geworden – das zeigt der deutliche Rückgang bei den Abo-Zahlen.
Dabei war das Ticket ein großer Erfolg: Es hat Bus und Bahn auch für Auszubildende, Studierende und Menschen mit geringem Einkommen bezahlbar gemacht.
(1/3)
Jointly with fabulous Timur Sevincer, Luisa Hostlowsky, and Fenja Styhler from Leuphana University Lüneburg
📝 preprint: osf.io/preprints/os...
We hope these findings inform efforts to close the perception–policy gap in climate governance.
#ClimatePolicy #BehavioralScience #PluralisticIgnorance
Why this matters:
Political decision-making is often shaped by perceived public opinion.
When policymakers underestimate public support for climate action - that is, they misread the “signal” - ambitious climate policies are less likely to be proposed or championed.
Acceptance of Taxes and Laws
Willingness to contribute 1% of income
Key Findings:
Citizens underestimate how much others support climate action, replicating earlier work on pluralistic ignorance✅
👉 but: Politicians show even greater underestimation (particularly regarding people's support for taxes, laws, and also their willingness to contribute 1% of income).
