@gp5.bsky.social
Interrested in many subjects with facts in them. Netzero progress.
On the 12h period it's a plus.
But it is also the added cost factor for Variable energy sources.
After there higher grid capacity build-out necessity.
Good news
09.08.2025 17:54 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Abundance is good an oversupply of energy isn't and a negative price is selfdestructive.
And actually increases overall cost for the grid.
Abundance is good an oversupply of energy isn't and a negative price is selfdestructive.
And actually increases overall cost for the grid.
So we don't really know a lot, which isn't abnormal.
08.08.2025 20:47 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Find it still premature to say there really is such a test.
And it doesn't seem a potential idea for a ballistic missile.
There is no nuclear exhaust in those designs as the use the thermal energy to add energy to the normal* rocket-motor.
As a potential for acceleration trought the solar system.
Very different types and size, it's already developed.
And we do build reactors on earth, if we build them in series.
unlike in the west where we really only build much more fossil and now and then a single reactor in the last 35 years.
It's about the N-th build, to increasing build speed.
UK-EPR is very different as well, compared to EPR in FR FI and China.
Sizewell will be build faster then hinkley C1 C2, where between 1&2 there was a 20-30% decrease in time.
It's possible, but not with this budget and probable some more years of shift.
And seeing the science budgets disappear is absurd indeed.
The previous candidate for Nasa was a capable person.
You are wrong though, the night is 28 days.
The main reason for a reactor in the artemis international project.
That's why the kilopower reactor was developed, it's also nothing new.
It's has been in development for a decade.
Don't think we'll be using it in 2030 though.
Maksym Nahornyi, the Ukrainian soldier once honored by Zelenskyy, was killed in combat and will be laid to rest on August 11 in Lutsk.
𧡠1/4 β¬οΈ
Thx for the reply.
06.08.2025 06:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Jacobson is not a serious scientist, when proven wrong, he takes them to court.
Last time he lost that.
HΓ© should stick to his part, wind.
And not be anti-nuclear.
No
05.08.2025 20:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It's not build for that.
I believe it also uses a higher enrichment fuel-type/
Also don't think we'll have a moonbase soon, because of other issues in the artemis Programm and all the nations that participate in it.
05.08.2025 17:06 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 02017, it has been developed further and tested.
05.08.2025 17:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It has been tested already, I showed you an article of 2017.
I'm only talking about the technology, not the silly politics you have in the USA.
I don't think we'll have a moonbase within 5-10 years.
I only look at this as a citizen of Earth.
All those topics gave been professionally researched and or dealt with.
info can be found on
Https://www.whatisnuclear.com
Nuclear energy is a longterm long-lasting part of the solutions needed.
Many others too.
Let's stay positive, to get forward.
It's nothing new, a moonbase needs this with 28 days of night.
2017:
www.nasa.gov/directorates...
Artemis project.
Includes a moonbase, with kilo power reactors, there is 28 day night on the moon.
www.nasa.gov/directorates...
Moonbase will have a 28 day night.
And the reactor is already developed, 2017:
www.nasa.gov/directorates...
It's called kilo power and has been developed already.
2017:
www.nasa.gov/directorates...
This is already developed, it's called kilo power.
2017:
www.nasa.gov/directorates...
The USA has build 2 this decade and more in the last 40.
More are on the way.
This is nothing new, Kilo power has been in development for years, the moon has a night that is 28 days long.
These reactors are very small and produce 10-100kW for many decades, depending on the choice.
Provide electricity and heat for a moonbase.
One of the other uses that Nuclear science can help us.
rhisotope.org
