I have mixed feelings. There's a be careful what you wish for and a punching down problem.
But I agree that the extent to which folks blow sugar is linked to the quality issues in the field.
I have mixed feelings. There's a be careful what you wish for and a punching down problem.
But I agree that the extent to which folks blow sugar is linked to the quality issues in the field.
You do what you can to really live the originalist moment.
28.02.2026 20:46 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This is a cocktail napkin under my pink tropical drink
28.02.2026 20:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Also I am writing this as a break from grading actual physical bluebooks.
Happy to report student penmanship better than expected.
I've done a cost benefit analysis of AI on the back of this napkin here and it's 100x costs vs 1x benefits.
Math can't be wrong.
I thought we are paid for grading?
28.02.2026 20:20 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0"geshtalt" grading on steroids
28.02.2026 19:46 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I'm a little confused but here's my best take: there's a good faith type defense to criminal contempt. And there are civil suits where QI is a defense. Both implicated here?
28.02.2026 16:53 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I love this, Maureen! Thank you for sharing. Plus the Ithaca connection....
26.02.2026 20:36 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Consider it moving professor dressing forward? #team3piecesuit
26.02.2026 20:17 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This was what I missed most about old twitter: following journalist reports of court hearing in real time. Thank you Ms. Bower! And the other journalists doing the same.
26.02.2026 20:12 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0He lost me at Yenni
25.02.2026 21:45 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Also thinking about this: no journal in which I have actually published has ever asked me for a review!
25.02.2026 02:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I don't find it insulting, just super irritating. But also the "please review this 70 page article in 48 hours thx" is just insane.
25.02.2026 01:58 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled that a trial judge in California improperly slashed the hourly rates sought by a small law firm after it won an antitrust case, saying that a law firm’s size cannot be used to justify awarding lower fees.
24.02.2026 22:40 — 👍 5 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0Can you explain, I'm confused
24.02.2026 19:06 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0In the US it's often a misdemeanor (as I understand it). How is it treated in the UK?
24.02.2026 12:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I thought maybe something bigger was at work? But you're prob right
24.02.2026 00:31 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
For adlaw or natsec people: what do you think this executive order means?
www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
Very keen to hear why. On the due process grounds I think it is strong. Indeed, I can't see the due process case for warrantless detention without notice, certainly not indefinite detention with no notice & no hearing.
21.02.2026 11:11 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0About 1/3 of the way in and so far I think it's fantastic. I love the nuance.
16.02.2026 13:16 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
This new paper on the general law and statutory interpretation looks so interesting, looking forward to reading it!
@aaronbruhl.bsky.social
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
How about "Whitman's Revenge"
(Insert picture of whitman's sampler here)
The 15th
15.02.2026 20:13 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0What do you assign as the text for what the common law is (or multiple definitions thereof)?
15.02.2026 16:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Read this.
15.02.2026 16:42 — 👍 23 🔁 5 💬 2 📌 0I love my RAs but they are mostly people I am training. I redo it all, but I like to help them learn. In terms of usefulness, I have had great luck with subciting or formatting tasks, they have found errors, corrected pincites, etc.
15.02.2026 01:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I will say our research librarian got some really good stuff for me via an AI enabled search, it wasn't a bad starting point at all.
15.02.2026 01:32 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0T.R.A.S.H.
15.02.2026 01:30 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Natural language West search is trash.
15.02.2026 01:29 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0