If you read letters from a birmingham jail, MLK jr. explicitly cited himself as over capitalism. He was anti-capitalist.

I've been saying for years the ROI isn't worth the investment people keep putting into SpaceX, so I'd agree the constant destruction should be a red flag, particularly at this later stage of development.

This is in fact a process that is spending extra money to speed up production over efforts like blue origin. The savings come after the tech is developed, with quick launch cadences at an order of magnitude less cost per launch. At least, that's the claim.

Does it matter that the 'who' doesn't seem to ever know the facts, and outwardly admitted to existing purely as a messenger for the people who actually have direct knowlege?

Trump is using the power of the government to disrupt CBS and ABC anyway. Trump doesn't stay bought. He is the Darth Vader of changing the deal and instructing you pray he doesn't alter it further.

Its not protection money. Its a bribe to get in on the merger grift.

Wouldn't an adverse inference be a quicker remedy for civil contempt? It would better serve the interests of the rapid justice being sought by Comey to just put that weight on the scale for Comey rather than park everything here while waiting for contempt to compel production, would it not?

Absent some extraordinary circumstance, there isn't anyone employed by the court incentivized to obstruct the actions of the court. And its all court employees for this one. So a lot of people will be confused by your core question, because it assumes more executive branch obstruction.

If comey has not already have the information for the past 3 1/2 hours?

A clerk gets fired, and the next duty clerk makes them availible when Comey's lawyer walks in? Unlike recent disputes, where the executive branch holds the information, in this case the information is held by the Judicial.

What are you concerned about? Under the existing order, Come already has the materials when the appeal was filed. Since the appeal is unable to affect the existing order before the clerk fulfilled it, What events do you think result in comey not already having the materials?

Bernie has been anti-elite longer than ive been alive, if simply individuals being anti-elite moved the needle, we wouldn't be here. By contrast, Dem leadership are elites. Thats why Clinton and then Biden and than an AG with a overenforcement scandal were the Last 3 candidates.

Wolf is chosing to protect the pedo with the goal of protecting his career by protecting his access by not dumping the transcripts publicly but filter them through journalists.

This is not speculation. Its why the 'The Big Short' guy, Michael Lewis, keeps getting access to financiers right before they collapse and keeps making them look evil, and can still be embedded with the next guy. 4/

Future interviews are not scheduled out for decades and his access to people in power is predicated on the subjects being willing to provide access and get interviews. Limited leaks can be excused if the leak has enough interest and the future subject assumes They are smarter than Trump. 3/

My position is that he is doing this to insulate his future interview subjects from the risk that transcripts are going to be dumped on the web. Because filtering through the media won't protect Wolf from retaliation from Trump. So the real threat must be the threat to future interview access. 2/

Pick a lane. Is going after the president by leaking the transcripts of interviews a threat to Wolfe's access to high-profile subjects, or is his access to power secure for decades?

The claim was that Wolf "wants"/"is seeking" to leak this information, but will only do so to via the media.

And his desire to filter his information through a media outlet, when media silence is part of the problem, rather than release those interviews broadly creates the implication you are responding to - Wolfe is more concerned with his future access to power than addressing the pedophile admin.

eliminating such exceptions for aesthetic reasons & B) Vances deep, deep desire for pasty, well muscled, clean shaven men in uniform.

drumming out Sikhs among other desireables is a clear goal, I do think a large part of what we see here is A) white men looking looking like the 'unkempt' 'lesser races' with religious and medical exceptions to grooming and not looking like the ubermensch and the right's long history of 2/

Hes using pagan because he needs to distinguish between White supremacists who use norse imagry and those claiming religious exemptions. Vance, and the MAGA leadership in general, have shown distaste toward modern relaxations of shaving standards that allow for larger recruit pools. While 1/

parts that you normally don't learn until after law school. In theory, a lawyer trained through an apprenticeship is better situated to practice immediately, make a difference.

3)She didnt have anyone to give her a reality check about the time required & odds of success even if she put in the work.

1) Her presence is a major disruption to law schools, so smaller local schools are out, and she probably doesn't have the academic credentials for a more prestigious campus that might be able to manage the disruption.

2) Law apprenticing can teach you the process of law, not just the law itself, 1/

This allows the parties to blame individual action, absolving the party of blame while also giving the party the ultimate excuse to not sacrifice the sacrificial lamb.

You can not escape the advantages in organization and communication seen with parties and caucuses. they will reform.

This take misses that in the US, candidates don’t represent parties. The candidates are assigned to the parties by popular vote. Part of the problem was we eliminated part of the role of parties, actually setting policy and enforcing it through candidate choice.

At yet, the eventual dem presidential candidate will still think leaving the door open to be anti trans is a winning solution.

The posession and sale of weed is legal within the state. That has implications on this sort of case.

How it impacts assumptions about posession.
How it impacts assumptions about probable cause.
How it impacts scope and jurisdiction.
Interactions with Rogriguez v US (2015)

Its meaningful.

Link to the court documents?

"Our reporting". Which reporting is that? It seemed to me ITT you were taking a quite obtuse route to what was otherwise a straightforward request for a link to the full court documents, so you could acutally investigate your accusations. I don't see that you participated in any factual reporting.

you can, but the canisters are burning hot to the touch, they need a heater to work. Also, pouring tear gas. But You can, there are videos of it being done. Most use rags or clothes or gloves to resist the heat, or you can bat it/kick it back with plenty of household items.

You miss a key part of this. They need Israel for the End times to begin. they need israel because part of it is a war that starts in israel and wipes out the jews. They want to send the jews to die. And a lot of them talk like they will have to fight through the end times, not get raptured.

contempous successful appeal? has there been a new incident? otherwise the issue of contempt is on the docket for next week.The judge can’t impose new punishments because she was overturned. he lost the tro hearing. he had stricter requirements placed on him. one of them was curtailed what contempt