Woudl make a banging econ exam question
26.11.2025 11:05 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@economeager.bsky.social
Aspiring wastrel, applied econometrician. At http://rachaelmeager.com for bayes, dev econ and meta science. Also at http://rottenandgood.substack.com for writing, art, death and emotions. Gay academic nonbinary weirdo, cursed to be serious in life.
Woudl make a banging econ exam question
26.11.2025 11:05 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0If there was a McDonald's at the South Base Camp on Mount Everest how much would it charge for a Big Mac
26.11.2025 10:57 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 4 ๐ 0The wet bandits are Sisyphus and Kevin is their boulder
23.11.2025 14:57 โ ๐ 19 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0omg
26.11.2025 06:11 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0real
26.11.2025 03:08 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I once asked a bookseller at a large indie store how many people would have to buy a book for it to get the attention of the store buyer and cause an additional order and they said: Three.
25.11.2025 23:07 โ ๐ 7404 ๐ 3015 ๐ฌ 54 ๐ 108women and canadians are ruining everything i guess
26.11.2025 02:44 โ ๐ 18 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0This does sound of my interests!
25.11.2025 07:05 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Hmmmโฆ and โฆ I think they do fear loss of status with us actually, but just not as much as with fash ppl. (as a side note: Fearing loss of status more than loss of morality is so common that it continually surprises me but eventually I guess Iโll get used to itโฆ.)
24.11.2025 22:44 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Maybe this goes to your point that they find us cringe and annoying and they donโt find fascists or racists to be that
24.11.2025 22:41 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Ah shit that does track. Appeasement logic somehow always seems to make itself seem like wisdom also. But I do think the legitimacy issue is present because they donโt try to appease us, I have sometimes wondered if it is becuase we are not violent. It doesnโt seem to just be that tho
24.11.2025 22:40 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Lmao
24.11.2025 13:31 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Yeah there is a lot to this unfortunately
24.11.2025 13:31 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0One parsimonious explanation: universities presently exist quasi-independently outside the power of the state, and therefore to state actors, must be fully subsumed into the state for its ends, by any means necessary, no matter the consequences for both universities or the state
24.11.2025 12:38 โ ๐ 30 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 5 ๐ 1Agree with all of this, but I don't understand how taxing the fees that already subsidize unis for UK students in order to subsidize unis for UK students makes financial sense.
24.11.2025 12:15 โ ๐ 18 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0It doesnโt !!!!
24.11.2025 13:30 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Some of it is stupidity, in so far as UK politics and journalism has a deeply cynical anti-intellectualism shot through it ("we've had enough of experts") and the rest is a powerful resentment of the university system not just doing as it is told and wielding a modicum of non-centralised power
24.11.2025 13:17 โ ๐ 12 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Yeah good points here
24.11.2025 13:30 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0So they don't feel like the sort of places containing lots of people sympathetic to their own worldview, the sort of places wherein people who form their base of support congregate or work, are actually politically legitimate or economically productive places. And evidence can't interfere with this.
24.11.2025 11:38 โ ๐ 83 ๐ 7 ๐ฌ 4 ๐ 2I think that in some deep way the centre left actually agree with the right's characterisation of them, that's behind all the angsting about Professional Middle Classes contrasted with authentic true working people which always amounts to two right wing cariactures they just agree with.
24.11.2025 11:38 โ ๐ 176 ๐ 27 ๐ฌ 8 ๐ 3mini thread on why it is that the centre left now hates universities for some godforsaken reason
24.11.2025 11:54 โ ๐ 22 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0My theory, tested through exposure to Australian higher education administration, is that they are hopelessly captured by the consultants, and that higher education consultants are particularly shallow and uninteresting.
24.11.2025 11:49 โ ๐ 39 ๐ 8 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0sadly well said and all true :(
24.11.2025 11:52 โ ๐ 7 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0"you bolshie idiots can't govern!" then turning around and setting fire to a large, important industry because of have anxiety
24.11.2025 11:51 โ ๐ 91 ๐ 9 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0that sadly does kind of track, but it's so weird to be like "let's foresake billions of dollars in revenue and obvious soft power advantages so we can stick it to a fringe of people we find annoying" and that's like supposed to be a respectable, moderate position???
24.11.2025 11:44 โ ๐ 17 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0(to be clear, you said it / formulated it way better than i had been able to formulate it to myself, i fele like i am chewing over it. some kind of weird self hatred thing. like the simpsons joke "we hate life and ourselves" "We can't govern!"
24.11.2025 11:43 โ ๐ 14 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0it's got to be sometihng like this, i agree. but how on earth can that happen? it's like abuse victim mentality, but they run the nation now and yet they still dont believe in their own legitimacy.... as you can see my only way to understand this is psychological, it seems deranged as politics
24.11.2025 11:40 โ ๐ 32 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 6 ๐ 1i really struggle to understand why centre left parties do not like universities, do not like the soft power we wield (imagine getting to educate the children of your geopolitical rivals!!!! IMAGINE!!!). i dont believe that albo, starmer, etc are this stupid, it's got to be hatred. but y.
24.11.2025 11:36 โ ๐ 140 ๐ 17 ๐ฌ 6 ๐ 4it's incredible to be the target of this shit isnt it!
24.11.2025 11:32 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0our labor gov here is drastically capping the number of intl students instead (at a much lower cap than current numbers), which may be even stupider since it doesnt raise them any revenue
24.11.2025 11:31 โ ๐ 51 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0