This article is so irresponsible. Journalistic integrity feels foreign. I can read between the bullshit & tell when someone's telling me to interpret an event a certain way, but why do I have to exercise this daily?
Just report on events. Stop poisoning the well, that's manipulative.
This is where I'll exclusively be getting my news from now on.
They're literally agreeing with you & you're immediately knee jerk condescending them on their intelligence as if it weren't obvious what they were saying?
Then quote post them & their profile for people who aren't going to see any retraction for your misunderstanding.
That's foul, do better.
The phrase "in terms of" is becoming a legitimate trigger. Someone gave this to him & he's never looked back.
I'm the same way with food as I am drinks; Doesn't always need to be an experience, but it's nice to experience different tastes once in a while.
I'm gonna play your game tonight & see if I can cook you something up. Use it or not, no worries, I just love writing satire & checking out new games, so I win twice.
You've chosen perfectly, you just need to capitalize on the opportunity with clever satire.
If you need help brainstorming, I can't even decide how much of my life is real vs parody of myself at this point.
Eh, it's a good start, but if you miss your flights completely, think about the cardio you'd be able to get in.
No disagreements there.
That's pragmatic, I was just answering the question in front of me.
As long as you can strive for tax designation, which you should, then that's feasible, but lack of supplemental investment would likely delay by decades.
I'm not Canadian so I'm speaking purely in theory with limited context.
To incentivize future investments.
You could argue that a different incentive structure should be adopted, but I'm just answering based on the incentive structure that we currently operate from.
Because every event is a political device to create turmoil & bickering to avoid accountability or attention on the regime overtaking our government.
Most aren't equipped to stay resilient to this, especially those who claim they are.
It should be US vs MAGA, but so long as one side benefits from the power they wield, they're going to allow it to perpetuate.
It amazes me how much effort we all exert just to avoid saying that the normalization of this behavior is the leading contributor.
Left vs Right is legacy politics. We've not had this kind of climate in all of US history so it's not that the US will never change, it's that it has changed.
It'll always have problems, absolutely, but the bickering of the pre-Obama era wasn't even a candle light to this flame.
This is true for largely any pursued interest. Natural talent is rare, even rarer that it's in the realm you're passionate about. Some become passionate because they're naturally good, but nonetheless, every skill is pursued interest.
Pursued interest is resilience to failure.
Thanks for the vocabulary expansion, never heard the word "fealty" before.
Agreed, however, especially considering how much damage has been done to black communities deliberately with programs in place to offset that damage now suspended or under siege.
Deconstructing equity isn't equality.
Is "applause" authentic or is it more complacency? Those details do matter.
You need to socialize more of that seemed like anger. This interaction was weird, but anyways, be well, take care.
Sorry, do you know their votes?
Don't think about the world through the lens of a child. Operate on what you know, speculate on what you don't, but don't confirm what you can't.
"Foul-hoo-hoo-hoo-hooo"
For we, not for thee.
That who pardoned? Trump? No, 0 pardons were acceptable. January 6th was a domestic terrorist attack.
Holy hell your mind is warped if you think that's what "illegals" are doing as a standard.
You drank the Kool-Aid, pal. Good luck to you, be well.
Now I know that's eutopian view, so not feasible, but your go-to solution is "let's arm the teachers" over "let's make firearms more difficult to access" so I want you to argue for that.
The idea that widespread gun violence will be solved with more gun violence is ridiculous. Argue it, though.
..right, I don't think you're getting it, but you're new to your party, so you'll get their views down in time.
Sure, let's give teachers guns. Now we've gone from 10 kids dying to just 4. Now 2+ guns in the school instead of 1. This is pretty sensible.
What if, instead, we made it.. 0 guns.
You don't even agree with what you're pedalling, indicative by the contradictions, so what's up? Is this cognitive dissonance or what?
You can disavow shitty people affiliated with a political alignment you still agree with, you know? You don't need to treat it like a high school clique.
Sure, so what, you want some kind of registry for teachers to determine which ones are allowed to be armed?
Are you trolling me right now?
In ordinary times, I agree, in extraordinary times, we still are starved for authentic participation.
Less talk, more action, for sure, but I think politics in the US are immensely important towards the fate of the entire world.
It is unhealthy, but the conditions entirely are unhealthy.
Maybe, just maybe, players in the game do just have to play the game. All of you have jobs, right? Do you love all of your coworkers? Do you sometimes deal with Greg's weird political views because he's the only one who can make a change you need?
Stop acting in bad faith then expecting good faith.
All of these things can be true concurrently.
These are the theatrics. Dishonoring tradition we protect to our core for pageantry.
Honor his memory, absolutely, but all these medals & ceremonies are just for show, which makes disrespecting their honor that much more unsavory.
