Sure.
Inside a glacier on the top of a 7000ft mountain.
So you don't want Iran to have nukes you just want to shit talk Israel lol
You're also justifying Israel to use their nukes.
That would be a good point if the US didn't fight like 10 wars while having nukes and even lost some.
How do you negotiate with someone who wants to exterminate you with nukes? Israel offered Palestinians statehood. They turned it down because they wanted to wipe Israel off the map.
I think Claude is cooking here: claude.ai/public/artif...
Ask Russia.
It really is a genius maneuver.
"Israel started this war" Well who started the shadow-proxy war? Who said they wanted to wipe Israel off the map? 🤔
Re-read the link I posted, it shows exactly how close they were to making nukes. You are just denying reality and making up reasons why Israel are the bad guys.
So why did Iran bomb Iraqs nuclear program?
Did it stop the talks?
"They did it to stop nuclear treaty talks" Where is your evidence of this?
Making nukes is a provocation, from your own link:
"International law does recognize some circumstances where civilian structures could become legitimate military targets:
If they directly contribute to military action
If the military advantage clearly outweighs civilian harm"
Now would be the time for China to cook up some shady shit to spread the US thin.
Got it, so you're okay with Islamist fascism.
Are you implying Israel carpet bombed Gaza? It's a miracle there wasn't 100x the number of civilian deaths. The allies have killed more civilians in 1 bombing run in Germany then the entire war in Gaza.
How does this fit into your theory of ethics? claude.ai/share/4f0005...
Regardless of ethics, every country is allowed to do that under international law. There is a legally acceptable amount of civilian casualties that has to be proportional to the strategic value of a military target. Israel is allowed to do it, the only question is it proportional or not.
The state of war doesn't matter. Look up how proportionality when conducting airstrikes works and see for yourself. It's a complex issue. The short answer is that there is a level of legally acceptable civilian casualties and has to be proportional to the value of the military target.
Funny enough I was going to tell you to look that up but you did it for me. Like it says, yes Israel is allowed to attack civilian areas when there's valid military targets there.
There's literally 30 sources included. If you can't believe the facts your brain is broken and I wont waste anymore time here.
Read this. claude.ai/share/70a433...
Here's why. claude.ai/share/df774b...
Not sure anyone outside the Mossad saw things going this smooth. I've seen the maps of Irans air defense network and missile systems and it was pretty robust (from the air) but nobody knew they were planning to counter it from drone sites in country.
Does Iran have a right to nuke Israel?
So they just accidentally hit top military leaders? "unprovoked attack" on the country that has spent billions to fund genocidal jihadists who want to kill them?
But no, you're right, they were scared of Iran having good standing and not the nukes.
Lmao. You know you're talking about Iran? The one who spends billions to fund actual terrorists?
Israel really had no other option.
The only difference between you and Iranian leaders is that they say it's because their Jewish.
