"For me, free expression is about possibility, and possibility always contains both and even multiple ends, the beautiful ones and the brutal in equal measure” says writer and open source advocate Shin Yang in our latest Speaking Freely interview www.eff.org/pages/speak...
this administration scans authoritarian in everything it does, and the assault on the media -- and more precisely the public's right of access to accurate information & reporting -- is pretty much foundational. censorial in every respect.
(a protective order is an agreement among the parties and the court to keep information produced during discovery confidential, at least until it is used in a public court proceeding; typically court orders enforcing those agreements do not offend the First Amendment)
Judge McMahon's order was only to the MLA, one of the plaintiffs in this case, to remove them from their own YouTube channel. Judges do have a greater ability to control what discovery materials the parties make public. But that still should require a pre-existing protective order.
This eminently unconstitutional order will be overturned, either on appeal, or the judge on reconsideration. Still the damage -- the removal of truthful information pertaining to a matter of extreme public importance (and sourced from a court proceeding) being censored even temporarily-has been done
The gift that keeps on stabbing you in the heart over &over again.
Someone please ask every Congressian who voted for the TikTok ban if this (&everything else that has resulted) is what they intended.
And remember, the law allows it to happen to other companies too.
www.wsj.com/tech/tiktok-...
"No quarter" is one those terms that I'd hear friends use to mean "no mercy" (colloquially) or "not giving in" and I seemed annoyingly pedantic when I corrected them, so I stopped.
But of course, none of these friends are the Sec of Defense who thinks "quarter" is some woke, wussy, girlie thing.
What’s at stake in the fight against age verification is not just a single bill in a single state. It’s about whether “protecting children” becomes a legal pretext for embedding government control online that reinforces specific moral and religious worldviews. www.eff.org/deeplinks/2...
"A.B. 1043’s one-size-fits-all approach ... disregards the many ways in which we make and use digital tools. It assumes the internet and digital devices begin and end with the dominant technology companies and device makers, when we know that’s not the case."
www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
I'm hosting two book launch events: one in Berkeley April 7 & San Francisco April 9.
Come hang out with me, grab a book, and we can talk about how much influence financial corporations should have over online speech. RSVP links here:
raineyreitman.com/2026/03/12/c...
Know what would be cool to have right now?
A fully functioning Institute of Peace
🚨 Wide ranging powers have been voted through to restrict Internet access 🚨
Ministers will be able to impose digital ID checks, curfews and VPN restrictions without Parliamentary scrutiny.
This can be used on websites, social media, apps and games with no need to show there's any harm to children.
ht/ @cartooningforpeace.bsky.social @cartoonistsrights.org for the great work
today at the World Metaphors Classic the leader of the USA didn't bother to find out the details of the situation his team was in and blindly assumed they would win a matchup they ended up losing, jeopardizing their long-term standing for no good reason
This new report detailing threats to cartoonists around the world in 2023-25 is great in its comprehensiveness, emboldening by telling the stories of the bravery of the cartoonists, and disturbing in how widespread and serious the threats are. Read & share. www.cartooningforpeace.org/en/evenement...
‘Age Verification’ will force trans people to out themselves to use the internet. After Kansas suddenly invalidated hundreds of trans peoples’ licenses, experts warn the discrimination is set to extend to online spaces.
Today!
ICYMI, @thecoalition.bsky.social @knightcolumbia.org & @protectdemocracy.org filed a new First Amendment lawsuit earlier today challenging the Trump admin's denial of visas to tech researchers, tech workers, fact-checkers. Here's a post explaining why we're suing. mailchi.mp/knightcolumb...
It's Shuttlesworth Day! On March 9, 1964, civil rights icon Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth won two separate Supreme Court cases: Abernathy v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), in which Shuttlesworth was one of the defendants, and of the summarily decided Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 376 U.S. 339 (1964).
Follow closely this welcome and really important new lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's policy punishing social media misinformation and hate researchers with immigration consequences.
And you can continue the celebration tomorrow! March 10 marks the birthday of a different Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 394 U.S. 147 (1969), which remains one of the Court’s most important prior restraint cases.
These are just three of the eight SCOTUS cases in which Shuttlesworth was a party.
Abernathy v Sullivan was the companion case to NYT v Sullivan and the cases were decided with a single opinion. Back in 2019, I wrote about why it is really really important to think about the Sullivan cases as civil rights cases and not just free press cases: www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
It's Shuttlesworth Day! On March 9, 1964, civil rights icon Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth won two separate Supreme Court cases: Abernathy v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), in which Shuttlesworth was one of the defendants, and of the summarily decided Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 376 U.S. 339 (1964).
With age verification, we talk more about privacy and surveillance concerns, and some of us don't remember what it's like to be a minor, but that quote summarizes the other side of the coin. Personally I'm concerned about how sheltering children will make bad childhoods even worse.
Wanna join the fight against the spread of mandated online age restrictions? We have a whole resource page here: www.eff.org/issues/age-v...
Shin Yang builds the kind of online space most platforms say is impossible: a sex-positive community that protects anonymity without turning users into data. She tells us all about it in our latest Speaking Freely interview, here: www.eff.org/deeplinks/2...
Congratulations to the capitulating law firms for being a useful foil to those standing firm in the DOJ’s very first footnote.
Consensus here is honored, and very much so.
This International Women’s Day, five women at EFF talk about the women who have inspired them. www.eff.org/deeplinks/2...
As promised, once again I emphasize that "children have the right to access information, to speak and to associate" and these age gating laws are intentionally designed to restrict their exercise of those rights. www.cnet.com/tech/service...