Katrien

Hope he is correct, if Russian refineries are starting to blowing themselves up, it makes the task at hand easier for Ukraine.

That is killed and wounded. As Russia is sending wounded soldiers (even in wheelchairs) as assault troops, there probably is some double counting.

You still have change, if you live in a democracy.

Ready to wear, seems to have slightly different meaning in the fashion world than for everyone else.

Yield did increase quite a bit even over the previous auction a month ago.

Fair is very different from being legal, and it is only the latter that counts.

And time is of critical importance in these cases.

Except, none of the 26 countries other than Belgium have come forward to either alter the law at the EU level, or share the consequences.

I always read them and find the analysis very informative. So keep at it.

He did add the source, just not the link to the article.

There is no shortage of diesel.

No, they banned export of gasoline, and they banned non-producers from exporting diesel. But refineries still can export diesel. If Ukraine manages to destroy about 40% of the diesel refinery capacity, we probably will see a complete ban.

Refineries are still allowed to export. Gasoline exports have been completely halted for a while, and gasolibe shortages are increasing, so that is encouraging. For diesel, Ukraine would need to take out more than 40% of production. Hopefully they manage that.

If you didn't vote, you mandated whoever won the election.

But they are still exporting it, and supposedly last year exported 40% of their production. There might be localized shortages, but it seems unlikely that to get to the stage gasoline shortages is.

And have lots of Earth generated thermal energy.

No, they have enough diesel, they are still exporting it.

Diesel is widely available, they even still export it.

Diesel is still widely available, Russia is still exporting diesel, so that will not be the problem. The cost of electricity generated that way, might be.

Diesel is still widely available, so that will not be the problem. The extra cost might be a problem, as generators generated electricity is quite expensive.

No, diesel, whichbis widely available.

Diesel is still widely available, the problem will be more cost, as it is more expensive to generate electricity that way.

Diesel, which is still widely available.

No, they generally use diesel, which is still widely available. Supposedly last year Russia exported 40% of their diesel production. If true, it will be hard for Ukraine to create a real shortage of diesel. But electricity generated by a generator is more expensive.

The claim basically that by changing the name, the department of defense became "woke" and incompetent is ridiculous. Anyway, women were only allowed in combat roles in 2016, so that cannot have been the problem for the Vietnam and Korea wars.

He is successfully creating a dictatorship for himself. I wouldn't call him an idiot, but I am sure he is glad so many people do, as that keeps them from protesting or revolting en mass.

He is not insane, I think he knows very well what he is doing: he is successfully creating a dictatorship for himself. And unless Americans start revolting, he will succeed.

Like the Vietnam War, it was after World War 2, so he claims the US lost that as well.

His claim is that the Vietnam War was lost by the US.

These are all post world War 2, so his claim is that they were lost. Unless you think the US won those wars?