Cook County State's Attorney Eileen O'Neill Burke released the following statement on the reported plan to petition for the appointment of a special prosecutor:
“The reported plan to petition for a special prosecutor will make it more difficult for the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office to prosecute and win convictions against ICE agents who break the law and secure justice for victims harmed by their conduct. It is also frivolous, contrary to centuries of legal precedent and court rulings, riddled with factual errors, and ultimately hampers my office’s ability to hold ICE agents accountable. The stakes are too high for us to get this wrong, and I will strenuously oppose this petition.
We have all been horrified by the thuggish and inappropriate conduct of ICE agents in Chicago, Minnesota and across the country, causing each of us to ask each other: what can be done?
That’s why, to meet this unprecedented moment, I directed my office to draft and implement a comprehensive protocol to hold ICE agents accountable within the confines of the law, including a plan to preserve relevant evidence in case a future federal administration decides to pursue criminal charges. Every elected local prosecutor in Illinois and the Attorney General have adopted this protocol.
As stated in our protocol, local prosecutors' offices are restricted from serving as primary investigators in criminal cases. The Illinois Supreme Court held in People V. Ringland, 2017 that the State’s Attorney’s ability to investigate is “limited to circumstances where other law enforcement agencies inadequately deal with such investigation or where a law enforcement agency asks the State’s Attorney for assistance.” The CCSAO has no statutory authority to lead investigations into criminal conduct, despite any argument made to the contrary.
My office’s goal is not to merely charge, but to successfully prosecute and convict criminal ICE agents. The issues at hand are difficult due to the Supr…
Statement from Cook County State's Attorney Eileen O'Neill Burke:
10.03.2026 02:17 —
👍 33
🔁 8
💬 1
📌 1
The law firm that challenged U.S. Border Patrol Cmdr. Greg Bovino in federal court last fall signals a forthcoming bid for a special prosecutor to "investigate crimes committed by federal agents under Operation Midway Blitz."
Press conference Thursday:
09.03.2026 21:37 —
👍 260
🔁 81
💬 1
📌 3
Another Midway Blitz defendant in Chicago is opting for trial, a federal judge is told this afternoon.
This time it's Jose Mauricio Rosas-Hernandez:
09.03.2026 20:44 —
👍 76
🔁 19
💬 3
📌 4
Americans Are Now a Target in Trump’s Immigration Crackdown
A WSJ investigation tracked the U.S. citizens caught in the crosshairs of an aggressive federal campaign to detain and demonize dissenters.
From @wsj.com:
"Of the 279 people accused by officials on X of attacking federal officers in the past year, 181 were U.S. citizens, the Journal found. Close to half of those Americans were never charged with assault. None have been convicted at trial."
www.wsj.com/us-news/immi...
08.03.2026 16:29 —
👍 102
🔁 61
💬 1
📌 5
🔊 Listen Now: ICE protesters keep beating Trump in Chicago court, but the battles take a toll — 'It's about intimidation'
WBEZ on NPR One
ICE protesters keep beating Trump in Chicago court, but the battles take a toll — 'It's about intimidation'
An @wbez.org report with @mariahwoelfel.bsky.social: one.npr.org?sharedMediaI...
06.03.2026 16:08 —
👍 75
🔁 29
💬 2
📌 0
Yep, pretty much.
06.03.2026 00:01 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
This was a per curiam opinion (meaning "by the court" with no named author).
The case was before Chief Judge Michael Brennan (Trump) and Judges Frank Easterbrook (Reagan) and Michael Scudder (Trump).
Easterbrook dissented.
05.03.2026 23:08 —
👍 36
🔁 15
💬 1
📌 0
Ellis dismissed the case in January. She did so without prejudice.
But the 7th Circuit points out that, "The practical upshot of the district court’s decision is that the named plaintiffs and members of the class can refile in federal court tomorrow and try to reimplement the injunction anew."
05.03.2026 23:02 —
👍 23
🔁 6
💬 0
📌 0
The full opinion is here: cst.brightspotcdn.com/b3/26/ced883...
05.03.2026 22:59 —
👍 17
🔁 8
💬 1
📌 0
This case involved extraordinary circumstances. Working on a highly compressed timeline, the district court granted an overbroad, constitutionally suspect injunction. This decision was supported with hundreds of pages of factfinding, cover- ing incidents from over a dozen locations around the North- ern District of Illinois. That decision treated the claims of lead plaintiffs, class members, and non-class members as essen- tially interchangeable—both for Article III standing and for the merits. Yet when this court stayed the district court’s or- der, the plaintiffs quickly and voluntarily withdrew their case. Vacatur is therefore proper to ensure the district court’s injunction order does not affect future litigation, which would present its own facts and legal issues.
The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals just issued an opinion that officially vacates U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis' preliminary injunction against Operation Midway Blitz tactics and dismisses an appeal.
Along the way, they called Ellis' order "constitutionally suspect."
05.03.2026 22:57 —
👍 77
🔁 33
💬 7
📌 3
Statement from Christopher Parente, attorney for Chicago's Marimar Martinez:
"Everyone involved in the spreading of lies about Marimar Martinez is out of their job. Now it is time for the FBI to do their job and investigate."
05.03.2026 19:33 —
👍 475
🔁 141
💬 7
📌 2
Trump says that Kristi Noem is stepping down as Homeland Security secretary
The president said he would nominate Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin to replace her.
BREAKING: President Trump announces Kristi Noem is out as head of Homeland Security, picking Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin to replace her.
05.03.2026 18:52 —
👍 175
🔁 57
💬 44
📌 92
Hear from Ray Collins and Jocelyne Robledo, the Chicago couple charged after an ICE protest last fall — only to be cleared when a grand jury refused to indict them: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADy5...
01.03.2026 16:24 —
👍 59
🔁 18
💬 1
📌 0
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Cummings then followed up with a written order, that expanded the number of people who should be released to 36.
You can read it here: cst.brightspotcdn.com/72/ae/494d6b...
28.02.2026 14:06 —
👍 22
🔁 5
💬 0
📌 0
Court's adjourned.
26.02.2026 18:33 —
👍 33
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
At the end of a back-and-forth about whether the feds have any co-conspirator statements to offer, Hogan says "we'll let you know by the 31st."
26.02.2026 18:33 —
👍 37
🔁 3
💬 1
📌 0
Perry is setting the next status date for March 31.
26.02.2026 18:31 —
👍 31
🔁 3
💬 1
📌 0
Perry says the defense attorneys' real problem is "that you fundamentally do not believe the evidence supports a charge or a conviction."
"A bill of particulars is not going to solve that problem," Perry says. "A jury will."
26.02.2026 18:29 —
👍 88
🔁 7
💬 2
📌 1
The time period of the conspiracy is 9/26/25, the judge notes. The feds have indicated they're alleging a "spontaneous" conspiracy, she says, and they're "not necessarily aware of any" true threats in the case.
26.02.2026 18:28 —
👍 53
🔁 6
💬 4
📌 2
Perry says the defense hasn't met the standard for a bill of particulars, but "we've gotten you quite a bit of the way there."
26.02.2026 18:26 —
👍 43
🔁 4
💬 1
📌 0
As for whether prosecutors are alleging a "spontaneous conspiracy," Herman says "in a case like this … you'd have to kind of turn your mind into a knot to understand it."
26.02.2026 18:23 —
👍 53
🔁 5
💬 1
📌 1
Herman also circles back to the exchange below and says, "it's well settled that actions can also be expressive conduct."
bsky.app/profile/jons...
26.02.2026 18:22 —
👍 47
🔁 4
💬 2
📌 0