Has there been any truly independent costings of re-nationalising water?
Renationalisation of water will cost 100bn and will affect front line services including the NHS.
I suspect maybe you are young and still have teenage anger and impulsiveness that comes with it. I wish you well. And please try the humour - it makes people want to spend time with you.....and the love will follow. ❤️🧡💛💚💙
I am 100% for people being whoever they want to be.
I am definitely not a transphobe. What gave you that impression!
I still have hope. Try it. Try a little smile.
Zoinks do you realise that you see the world through a dark prism. Where everyone else is wrong, everyone else deserves to be abused. Your thread is a bonfire of aggression and outrage. I do hope that you discover love and humour because when you do, happiness will follow. 🩵
Fair point, thanks Kurt. The article should have stated this.
Example? You scotch egg stuffing wassak.
The article is about the government being slow to implement the supreme court ruling. To balance this they would need to be someone from the trans community saying that the government is being too fast.
The final two paragraphs in the article. Did you read to the end?
I thought the same. Wtf with this headline??
Brilliantly written. Encore! 👏
This is absolutely outrageous. I hope the one day we look back on this and collectively feel shame that society deemed these people criminals. I hope that one day in the future they will be rewarded with MBEs and have the statues put up in public spaces.
😂 yes, he saved all that money only for Trump to hand it out in tax cuts and then Trump still had to borrow more. It all seems a huge waste of time and money for Space boy. Hopefully he has learned not to trust Trump now.
This is one of your comments I can get behind! Absolutely right! About time someone bloody said it.
More bollocks. *Sigh* Go on then, explain what do you mean by Streetings war on trans youth, and Starmers cruelty to trans adults.
This sounds like a non-story. That blue labour group have proposed changes. And yet the article makes very clear that the equalities and disability ministers are absolutely dead set against them. So what exactly are you reporting? That lobby in groups exist? Of course they do. Waste of time article.
They literally just stood up in parliament yesterday and said that it was monstrous! Please pay attention.
Ha! Brilliantly put. 👍
Gary I just stumbled across your account when blue sky suggested it. Your art work is absolutely astonishing and your musings on life are perfectly relatable to me. I'm so pleased to have the opportunity to follow you and see your future work! Thank you!
It's good that you're supporting the charity but why are you taking so many huge jars of pasta sauce?
Are you being paid to trash Labour?
They remain the party with the largest share you fool.
Absolute bollocks. What is a trashed ecosystem? This is not a recognised term. You need to say if it is a priority habitat that can support protected species. Or just plain modified grassland that can support few species. Be better. Do your research. Bleating with populist gruel is an embarrassment.
Oi Moinbot! Where's some specific examples of what could happen with the new law?? Without this you lack credibility. Environmental protection? do you mean just grass is going to be dug up or priority habitats are going to be removed? Do your research and report properly.
Oi Moinbot! Where's some specific examples of what could happen with the new law?? Without this you lack credibility. Environmental protection? do you mean just grass is going to be dug up or priority habitats are going to be removed? Do your research and report properly.
So George Moinbot could have said, for example, that with the new law, a developer could cut down a priority habitat such as a woodland and build housing. But he doesn't. He doesn't give specific examples like this so I am suspicious that the protections in place for protected wildlife remain.
Thanks for the link. This article talks about how natural England gets final say. Natural England are already the authority for protected species surveys and licences. So it is not really a concern. I was interested in specific examples of what could happen with the law change.
This article lacks any specific detail or examples. Therefore, as both a Labour supporter and wildlife fan, I am left a bit confused. Great crested newts and bats are still a protected species. This has not changed. What, with specific examples do you think could happen, George?
