Margwar's Avatar

Margwar

@margwar.bsky.social

Tell me your story first. You know why I'm here.

483 Followers  |  187 Following  |  216 Posts  |  Joined: 14.11.2024  |  2.289

Latest posts by margwar.bsky.social on Bluesky

I think it's time we unite & cross that fucking line....before we have nothing left.

27.10.2025 01:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This. Precisely.

27.10.2025 01:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The problem is, other than noise we ARE abiding it. His bold lies are accepted not questions. Everything he says is taken as true & even when proved to be a lie, no one does anything.

27.10.2025 01:42 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Further proof they want to kill off SNAP & poverty stricken people. They have no interest in saving or caring for them.

27.10.2025 01:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Not the symbol... the essence.. the catalyst.. the embodiment.

24.10.2025 10:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Unfortunately, lately... more crying

24.10.2025 10:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Hoverboards for all!

14.10.2025 12:19 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Obamacare didn't cause premiums to skyrocket. Insurance companies did that, because the GOP let them. Look, it's simple math. In order to give everyone healthcare, someone needs to pay for it. Doing so nationally allows fiscal control of those who have profits on our health-- insurance &big Pharma.

14.10.2025 12:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"I think people endure best when they see they are not alone. Thatโ€™s why taking part in marches and demonstrations matters โ€” people out there agree with you. We are indeed not alone. Trump has a majority of people disapproving of him in the opinion polls right now. Letโ€™s not forget that!"

14.10.2025 12:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Why allow this man any relevance? He should be relagated to oblivion.

14.10.2025 11:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

THIS: ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

14.10.2025 09:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 21393    ๐Ÿ” 8524    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 810    ๐Ÿ“Œ 341

Pigs. Both of them.

14.10.2025 11:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
US news outlets refuse to sign new Pentagon rules to report only official information Defense department policy requires outlets to vow not to obtain unauthorized files and restricts access to some areas

US news outlets refuse to sign new Pentagon rules to report only official information www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

They're trying to get the press to voluntarily surrender the First Amendment. #wecallbullshit

14.10.2025 01:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 5    ๐Ÿ” 2    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

So does that make him an unnamed co-conspirator?

08.10.2025 23:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Now That Fascism is Here... Fascism isnโ€™t coming to America; itโ€™s here.

We cannot let the myth of American exceptionalism numb us into imagining we are above devolving into inhumanity.

We have every ingredient in place to become something historically monstrous.

It will happen here unless we refuse to allow it.

johnpavlovitz.substack.com/p/now-that-f...

04.10.2025 12:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1871    ๐Ÿ” 823    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 114    ๐Ÿ“Œ 47

Too goddamn long

01.10.2025 22:58 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

Imagine having so much power as a Minority party you are able to shut the majority party's government down....what does that say about the party in power? They can't government, collaborate or negotiate.

01.10.2025 22:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

And yet....here we are

14.09.2025 17:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I hate the media frenzy that gave us hope that FDT might be ill/dead.

03.09.2025 02:18 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The struggle is real

27.08.2025 14:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"But Dad, I hate wearing a suit. Do I really have to? "

27.08.2025 07:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm a little concerned that none of the bears are actually catching any of them.... they're either full or high... and I'm hoping it's the former.

27.08.2025 07:20 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 13    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Always was....

27.08.2025 07:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This is not my America.
This is sinister, sick and scary.
Now the criminals are wearing uniforms.

11.06.2025 02:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

There is no other choice.

IMPEACH
CONVICT
REMOVE

10.06.2025 23:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 223    ๐Ÿ” 57    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 11    ๐Ÿ“Œ 4

Damn! Montana? Who would've thunk it!?

11.06.2025 02:58 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
CONCLUSION
ยถ127 Reproductive decisions are among the most intimate that a person may make in their
lifetime. This includes the decision to obtain a pre-viability abortion and the decision to
carry a pregnancy to termโ€”both of which carry widely varying personal considerations,
decisions, hardships, and desires that are deeply unique and personal to each individual in
Montana, and both of which are protected under the state constitutional right to privacy.
We do not take lightly the varying beliefs that fuel the disputes surrounding these issues.
The case before us follows decades of precedent that the Montana Constitutionโ€™s right to
privacy guarantees, absent a compelling state interest, โ€œthe right to be let aloneโ€โ€”which
long has been recognized as one of the most important rights. Gryczan, 283 Mont. at 455,
942 P.2d at 125. This privacy right includes the right to personal and procreative autonomy
under the Montana Constitution, wholly independent of federal constitutional standards.
Armstrong, ยถยถ 39, 41 (citing Gryczan, 283 Mont. at 448, 942 P.2d at 121). The State has
not established that the challenged laws address a medically acknowledged bona fide health

CONCLUSION ยถ127 Reproductive decisions are among the most intimate that a person may make in their lifetime. This includes the decision to obtain a pre-viability abortion and the decision to carry a pregnancy to termโ€”both of which carry widely varying personal considerations, decisions, hardships, and desires that are deeply unique and personal to each individual in Montana, and both of which are protected under the state constitutional right to privacy. We do not take lightly the varying beliefs that fuel the disputes surrounding these issues. The case before us follows decades of precedent that the Montana Constitutionโ€™s right to privacy guarantees, absent a compelling state interest, โ€œthe right to be let aloneโ€โ€”which long has been recognized as one of the most important rights. Gryczan, 283 Mont. at 455, 942 P.2d at 125. This privacy right includes the right to personal and procreative autonomy under the Montana Constitution, wholly independent of federal constitutional standards. Armstrong, ยถยถ 39, 41 (citing Gryczan, 283 Mont. at 448, 942 P.2d at 121). The State has not established that the challenged laws address a medically acknowledged bona fide health

risk to justify infringing on the right of individuals to make medical judgments affecting
their bodies in partnership with their health care provider, or that they are narrowly tailored
to meet the compelling interests it asserts. Armstrong, ยถยถ 41, 62; Weems, ยถ 37.
ยถ128 We affirm the District Courtโ€™s order declaring HB 136, HB 140, and HB 171
unconstitutional under Article II, Section 10, of the Montana Constitution. We also affirm
its order declaring HB 136 unconstitutional under Article II, Section 4, of the Montana
Constitution, and declaring HB 171 unconstitutional as impermissible viewpoint
discrimination under Article II, Section 7, of the Montana Constitution. Accordingly, we
affirm the District Courtโ€™s judgment permanently enjoining the enforcement of
ยงยง 50-20-601 through -606, 50-20-701 through -714, 50-20-105(4) and 50-20-113, MCA
(2021), and the 2021 amendments to ยง 50-20-109, MCA.

risk to justify infringing on the right of individuals to make medical judgments affecting their bodies in partnership with their health care provider, or that they are narrowly tailored to meet the compelling interests it asserts. Armstrong, ยถยถ 41, 62; Weems, ยถ 37. ยถ128 We affirm the District Courtโ€™s order declaring HB 136, HB 140, and HB 171 unconstitutional under Article II, Section 10, of the Montana Constitution. We also affirm its order declaring HB 136 unconstitutional under Article II, Section 4, of the Montana Constitution, and declaring HB 171 unconstitutional as impermissible viewpoint discrimination under Article II, Section 7, of the Montana Constitution. Accordingly, we affirm the District Courtโ€™s judgment permanently enjoining the enforcement of ยงยง 50-20-601 through -606, 50-20-701 through -714, 50-20-105(4) and 50-20-113, MCA (2021), and the 2021 amendments to ยง 50-20-109, MCA.

NEW: The Montana Supreme Court today held that a trio of abortion restrictions--including a ban at 20 weeks--violate the state constitution, tracing a strong state right to privacy back to the 1972 Montana constitutional convention. 1/ juddocumentservice.mt.gov/getDocByCTra...

10.06.2025 04:12 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 997    ๐Ÿ” 239    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 12    ๐Ÿ“Œ 8
Preview
Live updates: California Gov. Newsom blasts Trump; New Jersey voters pick nominees for governor's race Live updates and the latest news as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies on the Hill and primary day arrives in the New Jersey governor's race.

Please watch and share Governor Gavin Newsom most recent statement regarding ice, the protests and Trump, that he made this evening
Its POWERFUL !https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/live-blog/trump-administration-hegseth-china-nj-primary-immigration-live-updates-rcna211664

11.06.2025 02:40 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 149    ๐Ÿ” 78    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 9    ๐Ÿ“Œ 2

Need a dislike button @bsky.app

28.05.2025 21:54 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@margwar is following 19 prominent accounts