The Armed Squid

Blocked me as well.

I guess he wasn’t not vaxxed enough. 😂

I inhaled mine.

Did you learn that in the 19th century, soldiers would mail home small pox scabs with instructions to slip pieces of it under the skin of the family they left back home?

And it worked.

False equivalency.

English 101 taught me what a vaccine was. Biology 101 taught me that vaccines work because they were tested for years and proved their worth.

Never got it. Never needed it.

When I was getting my higher education, all my vaccines were one-time and actually worked. I didn’t need four boosters and the very definition of vaccine changed.

Oh, I know you’re fully vaxxed.

You need a booster or four.

Yeah. All about you.

But only as a cautionary tale.

We actually love them. And more to the point, understand them.

It’s you who neither loves nor understands words.

Why are you so anti liberty and freedom?

But it says “the Right of the People”. Not the right of SOME people. Or the right of people only in a militia.

Why would the People need to be well regulated if it’s only a militia that has the Right?

Even your logic contradicts itself.

That who is eligible to participate in a Federal militia. But until one is called up, how can it be judged well regulated?

Not what was asked.

Wanna try answering my question again?

So explain how, grammatically, well regulated jumps across the sentence to describe the People or their Arms.

Which specifically means what?

And my age or able bodiness or gender has any impact upon my exercise of my individual Right to keep and bear Arms.

Because only a militia is desired to be well regulated, meaning functioning properly or effectively. There is no well regulated people. Therefore, there is no overlap.

Neither did Burger. 😂

How do you put it? Oh, yeah:

Wrong.

Well, good luck to you.

I still have my “toys” as you put it, and take perverse pleasure knowing that twists you into knots.

And you are basing much of your arguments for gun control from comments by a man who actively, judicially, was against women. 😂

Sounds like you answered your own question.

Okay, buddy. Whatever you say.

Rights are defined by Congress and ratified by the States. Courts can expand on Rights but cannot create them.

And the Courts only sent the issue to the states.

Sure. Support a misogynistic, homophobe. That’s your right.

Then please direct me to the amendment declaring it a Right.

And given his track record against women and homosexuals, I’d not use him as a champion for gun control.

Ah, the Nothing Burger “quote”.

Cobbled together from separate interviews after he retired from the Court. It was only his opinion and held no weight of law.

Burger never once sat a 2A-related case in his career.