All Things Physics's Avatar

All Things Physics

@allthingsphysics.bsky.social

Sharing the beauty of All Things Physics through detailed video explorations! Check it out at https://youtube.com/AllThingsPhysicsYouTube

76 Followers  |  18 Following  |  171 Posts  |  Joined: 18.10.2023  |  2.0621

Latest posts by allthingsphysics.bsky.social on Bluesky

Thanks! And I enjoyed yours. You and I share some programming history.

05.08.2025 20:57 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Heh…I usually continue revising my talks until right before I give it!

05.08.2025 11:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

And yes, I do realize it’s nearly impossible to foresee benefits before the fact.

02.08.2025 10:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Don’t get me wrong. I’m a theorist at heart, and agree that theories are cheap. But I do wonder whether pushing experiments to the quark/string/whatever level would have any benefits beyond ruling out a few theories, and the expense is likely to be staggering.

02.08.2025 10:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You’re right, it could be asked of any science. I guess I’m interested in fundamental physics because the experiments that are undoubtedly necessary to rule out some of the theories get more and more expensive as we get more fundamental. Is there a point when the rewards are not worth the effort?

02.08.2025 01:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I guess that’s true. But this will likely lead to competing theories that will eventually need to be decided by larger and more expensive experiments. At some point this becomes unsustainable, and I’m wondering where this point lies.

02.08.2025 01:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m asking Sean, of course, not you.

01.08.2025 21:45 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Okay, so I appreciate the clarification. Now I’d like an answer to my original question. When does searching for a final theory no longer make practical sense (assuming it relies on public funding)?

01.08.2025 21:45 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I don’t even think mathematical logic is necessary. Okay, we β€œknow” we don’t have a final theory at this point. But what would it mean to β€œknow” we have a final theory, even if β€œknow” simply means β€œhave in hand”? Does final theory here just mean something that connects QM and gravity?

01.08.2025 16:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Because science works by finding flaws in theories to improve them. There is no mechanism by which a theory is ever proven correct (or final).

01.08.2025 10:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m curious about your statement that β€œWe don’t know the final theory.” The nature of science is such that we will never know the final theory. So my question to you is, when does searching for a final theory no longer make practical sense (assuming that public funding is necessary)?

31.07.2025 23:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Heh…love the video! We should seriously consider collaborating on a project in the future!

31.07.2025 22:59 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Agreed. I just get frustrated when people are opposed to using it at all rather than finding out how it’s useful.

24.07.2025 15:03 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It does take a little practice, but you learn quickly to be very detailed.

24.07.2025 15:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s also been good at things like making tv show recommendations, based on some preferences, or providing directions for how to get somewhere in a strange city, including a combination of walking, bus, and trains.

24.07.2025 14:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Here’s a β€œgoogle search” example. We were at a vacation home and saw a strange appliance. We sent a picture to ChatGPT and asked: what is this device and how do we use it? And it told us exactly what we wanted to know.

24.07.2025 10:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The latest thing I tried was to: write a manim program to create a ten by ten by ten grid of cubes that are arranged in the form of a larger cube. I know that’s not a difficult program, but working out the spacing would have taken me a while and it gave me a perfect program in about 5 seconds.

24.07.2025 10:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

No. I use it for info gathering and programming tasks, among other things. See my response to Dan Schroeder.

23.07.2025 23:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

easier to find information that I would have normally β€œsearched the web” for. It’s also incredibly useful for helping me write code. If you have a block of code that will require nested loops, for example, a good prompt will have the code written in 6 seconds, saving me hours of frustration.

23.07.2025 23:53 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

AI can be incredibly useful (if you don’t think so, then you either haven’t tried it, or you’re in denial). But so far there’s little sign of actual intelligence.

23.07.2025 23:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

You’re right, it does sound thunderous!

17.07.2025 09:59 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Where’s the video?

16.07.2025 23:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

In my opinion, work and energy tends to be a mess in almost all textbooks. It’s much more subtle than most people realize. Sherwood and Chabay’s Matter and Interactions is one of the few texts that gets it right.

16.07.2025 16:00 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I realize companies will occasionally need to update their terms of service, but this is somewhat shocking. Thankfully, I don’t use #WeTransfer.

15.07.2025 15:05 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ramen πŸ™

27.06.2025 22:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes, most β€œdemonstrations” of diffusion are not, in fact, demonstrations of diffusion!

16.06.2025 11:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I was recently visiting family in the Seattle area, and I had forgotten how beautiful this area is. Here’s a shot of Mt. Rainier as I left town.

10.06.2025 16:34 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Nice! We have baby foxes! 🦊

08.06.2025 02:24 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ˜‚

04.06.2025 16:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€œDelves”?? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

04.06.2025 14:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@allthingsphysics is following 18 prominent accounts