I’m still not optimistic. We have a felon in the White House who has been impeached twice (and deserves a third time), but we can’t get 2/3 of the Senate to give him the boot.

See my response to the other fellow.

Barney Frank using the “nuclear option” years ago backfired spectacularly when the GOP got the upper hand.

If you can do it, they can too.

If they can get away with eliminating a representative’s job because they have a majority or supermajority, what is to stop them from using your tool to end their term early.

Honesty isn’t important to the corrupt.

Be careful what you wish for.

I read earlier this year that if they had voted, they would have voted Trump.

I wonder how many will say “no thanks. I’ll wait until there’s an administration I can trust.”

The Epstein files are a distraction

Why am I not surprised.

Let’s face it, we have a White Supremacist government.

The CSA finally won.

He probably bought votes.

He doesn’t care about anything but money and fucking people over.

Reminder: Tariffs aren't paid by other countries, no matter what Trump says.

A tariff is an import tax, raising the price of almost everything we buy.

Tariffs are also regressive — taking a higher percentage out of the paychecks of working people than out of the wealthy.

Well, if no one notices it, no one can do anything about it.

This highlights that the GOP is trying to take your right to be represented away from you.

Now you know it’s happening. What are you going to do about it?

They used it as a verification tool

It keeps them from being able to do it without people noticing at least.

Based on history, if the Republicans go this route, it will lead to violence. Maybe not right away, but it will lead to violence. When the people think the vote is worthless and they’re not being heard, they will see no other choice.

Yes, nonviolence will be an option - but violence is easier.

Other than perhaps keeping what you write together - say in a notebook, so you can look at it again if you want to, I don’t think there’s a wrong way to do it. It could even just be some bullet points. 🤷‍♂️. It’s not as if someone is going to tell you you’re doing it wrong. 😀

Now I have to look that person up because I don’t know who that is.

I never thought that I would see the day. I thought our news organizations took their duty seriously.

It turns out they only care about the money.

I’m glad you get it. Hopefully you can have that response, then move past it when you remember that red doesn’t just mean MAGA. 😉

One hat is a Red Sox hat and the other is Harvard.

So what about the St. Louis Cardinals fans?

There are also red hats that spoof MAGA or are otherwise responses to MAGA. You can find “No Kings” hats that are red. I’m sure the color choice was deliberate, too.

So they can’t talk about anything else? They don’t ignore what the government is doing, but sometimes we need a break it up or we will get burnt out and stop listening completely.

They want to do this in Missouri too.

They want free handouts for the wealthy. We call them tax cuts.

You claimed something was true. You did not show that it was true.

If you won’t support what you say, I don’t have anything to engage with.

So you’re unable to support what you said.

I was referring to your statement that NPR covered for Biden.

You just going to assert that or support it?

Same thing.

They did report about how Biden’s decline was hidden by his inner circle when it became known.