Zuvele

Goslings!

And the Teals claimed credit for it...including Brereton's appointment.

Bragg on Albanese: "He's very powerful, and I think people are starting to see him for who he is. He's very weak..'

I think the messaging needs to be more on target...

#auspol

What I get from this is that he spends most of his time being tested for things.

Seriously, if you think censorship is bad, start campaigning for age restrictions to be removed from movies and magazines.
Oh, and for purchasing alcohol and driving cars....

Wow.
Can't admit you got something wrong, so you're getting snarky.
You be you.

Er, no, I really didn't.

In fact, I emphasised that it was the most important sentence in my post when you queried that.

I made an observation. You're the one who obsessed about it.

Well, as someone who was on these supports for a couple of decades, no.

Ah, so you can mislead as long as it's opinion.
If it were Andrew Bolt doing the misleading, you'd be outraged.

I did, at the start of the thread.

If you march into a Minister's office making false claims you get nowhere. They have the numbers at their fingertips, and you immediately come across as ignorant - and ignorable.
Facts are important.
Especially when you're a journalist, and that's your job.

It'd help if I knew what we were disagreeing about.

The first sentence is the most important.

Note the bit where I said the system needs reform.
It definitely does.

Her claim is that this means that Centrelink recipients have NO savings. That is incorrect.
Oh, and I did the google search. Obviously.

Please pass the task of advocacy for change to someone who has a better understanding of the system and is less emotive.
Ministers listen to people who know what they're talking about; they will instantly dismiss emotion-drive arguments based on poor understanding.

...and when you look at all the qualifiers you run for the 618,000 people, not all of them apply to every one of them.
Again, the system needs reform, but facts are also good things which should be respected.

Oh, and yes, the system needs fixing.

'That’s 618,000 people with no savings (you have to run down your savings before you can receive welfare)....'

If you don't actually know what you're on about, should you be writing about it?

This claim is refuted by a google search.

(Says someone who was on Centrelink and did have savings).

But even so, it rocks.

This is why only two pencils are necessary...

He thinks there are other things little girls should be playing with instead.

I know Trump hasn't got his pen licence yet, and has a nice pack of crayons instead, but that's not a good reason to deny the other kids pencils.

And we internalise, as women, that we're driven by emotion and instinct, a big mass of whirling uncontrolled hormones.
Whereas I found it's men who, thwarted, throw their books on the floor and storm out of the room...

My role at one stage was literally to tell the party it had stuffed up.
atm, however, no one knows how this will work out...but no one seems to have come up with any better ideas.
(including tech companies, the EU, the United Nations, all of whom are looking for a fix)

There was a particular problem which people want fixed (including most countries in the EU).
This is one potential fix for that problem.
You've identified other problems.
If you want them fixed, do some lobbying.

If the teen can't access social media*, then content, moderation, radicalisation, predatory business practices, advertising and gambling aren't relevant.
We assume adults can handle these things.
*If they can, the company risks huge fines.

Oh, bollocks.

Again, the ID stuff is the responsibility of the social media provider, who already has most of that information (you just haven't worried about it before).
They're using the existing information they already have and matching it to what you've provided to prove you are you.