Our favourite diagram from the report - @msingerhobbs.bsky.social and I know which city we want to live in!
π Mass transit drives thriving high streets and local growth β but mayors and cities currently take the risk and don't always reap the rewards. Letting them keep and invest in that growth could unlock UK cities
π»οΈ @aditisriram.bsky.social on @LBCNews π www.ippr.org/articles/transport-and-growth
If weβre serious about growth, we canβt just announce projects.
We have to fix the funding model - so cities like Bristol can build the infrastructure that creates businesses, jobs and homes.
France does this differently.
Regions receive a share of national tax revenues, giving them stable funding to invest in long-term infrastructure like tram systems.
We need to take a serious look at how we fund local transport in the UK.
So why donβt we build it?
Mayors take the risk of delivering big transport projects.
But when productivity rises, the increases in income tax, corporation tax and VAT goes straight to the Treasury - not the city that made it happen.
That imbalance matters.
Weβve done this before.
Mass transit connects people to better jobs, supports local business, and makes it possible to build better connected homes.
Thatβs what productivity should look like: more opportunity, higher pay, and a better quality of life.
A century ago, Bristol had 17 electric tram routes running across the city.
Today, it has no mass transit system at all.
Meanwhile, 23 smaller cities in France have modern tram networks.
A quick intro: Iβm Aditi - an economist at @ippr.org and a proud tax-design nerd, working on how to make our systems fairer, more effective and actually work for people.