Nick's Avatar

Nick

@nkc.bsky.social

Former music theorist, current health care lawyer. Alum of UT-Austin and Kansas and some other places. He/him. Ad Astra per Aspera 🌻

937 Followers  |  426 Following  |  52 Posts  |  Joined: 08.06.2023  |  1.7027

Latest posts by nkc.bsky.social on Bluesky

Bumgarner was just absolutely lights out that series, we couldn’t even be that mad. What a performance

03.11.2025 22:57 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

That is definitely how I felt. Yall at least have a top five payroll if I’m remembering right, so should be a little easier to stay in the hunt (not that spending big has helped the angels, Yankees, or Mets that much lately)

03.11.2025 22:56 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Speaking of the Giants, after the Royals lost game seven of the 2014 series to the giants I figured KC’s window was probably over, only for the royals to get back and win it the next year. Manifesting the same for Toronto

03.11.2025 22:21 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Rough way for it to end, man. Wanted this for you guys

02.11.2025 12:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So anyways

02.11.2025 01:01 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Lmao

02.11.2025 00:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@brynhughes.net I don’t dislike Ohtani but I gotta say I’m kinda hoping the jays absolutely blast him because how smug you’ll be about it would be extremely funny for me

02.11.2025 00:20 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Probably for the best tbh

28.10.2025 05:34 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ahahahaha

28.10.2025 05:27 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Omfg

28.10.2025 05:25 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

At this point let’s just get to infielders pitching. Why not

28.10.2025 05:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Dangit so close

28.10.2025 04:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ‘€πŸ‘€πŸ‘€πŸ‘€πŸ‘€πŸ‘€

28.10.2025 04:42 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It would be so damn funny

28.10.2025 04:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Ideally a bases loaded walk-in run from Kersh. Wild pitch run would also be acceptable

28.10.2025 04:38 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Whew I’m so glad y’all got out of that inning I was worried about being blamed for a jinx with this. Will be more careful with my word choice going forward 🫑

28.10.2025 04:23 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Ok that turned out better than expected

28.10.2025 04:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This pitcher does not inspire confidence

28.10.2025 04:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Omg what a play

28.10.2025 03:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Can’t agree with you on that one, clemency on the grounds that it was extremely funny

28.10.2025 03:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Can’t blame you. Not only is he keeping the dodgers in the series, but he walked out on y’all with his dog dressed in jays gear

28.10.2025 03:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s unreal how good the Angels are at doing less with more

28.10.2025 03:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ok but dang that man is good at baseball

28.10.2025 03:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Ok have confirmed that this time I’m not watching a game from several days ago 🫑

28.10.2025 00:04 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I would not expect you to be. Can confirm that it was thrilling the second time too

27.10.2025 03:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I was truly shocked at your level of calm

27.10.2025 03:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Omg I had the jays game on in the background while I was working and only now realized it was a replay of game one, I was so excited for y’all. Like wow they’re blowing out LA again

27.10.2025 03:01 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Impressive level of commitment for you to not be tweeting rn

27.10.2025 02:17 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Y’all lookin gooooood

25.10.2025 03:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

They’re materially the same policy with respect to manual review of DMs. I don’t like Musk either but this is like standard privacy policy language for accessing and processing of data

17.03.2025 18:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@nkc is following 19 prominent accounts