C'est assez génial dans l'ensemble
04.08.2025 08:41 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@lonnibesancon.bsky.social
Assist. Prof'ing in Data Vis & Sleuth'ing "Troublemaker for truth" @ABCaustralia "Dogged critic" @ScienceMagazine @TEDx speaker #openscience #vegan
C'est assez génial dans l'ensemble
04.08.2025 08:41 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Alors, les pangolins, ça roule ?...🔽
01.08.2025 18:31 — 👍 33 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 0Lonni Besançon, a data-visualization researcher, spoke with Nature Careers about his work as a research-integrity sleuth that started during the COVID-19 pandemic and facing online abuse, threats and legal challenges because of it. #Academicsky 🧪
31.07.2025 01:32 — 👍 127 🔁 47 💬 2 📌 6Haha true that! IG is definitely more th platform for this
03.08.2025 15:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Weather report: sauna by the river
03.08.2025 11:10 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Wow.
Research findings with p-values marginally less than 0.05 attract 60 to 110% higher Altmetric scores than those with p-values marginally above 0.05.
p-hacking means more popular attention!
p-hacking FTW!
Thanks :)
01.08.2025 13:23 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Merci c'est adorable :)
01.08.2025 08:04 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Merci!
01.08.2025 07:54 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0@lonnibesancon.bsky.social 👍
01.08.2025 07:53 — 👍 9 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 0Merci
31.07.2025 23:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Très beau portrait publié par Nature. Qu’il soit inspirant pour les futurs chercheurs mais aussi tous les citoyens 👍
31.07.2025 21:54 — 👍 12 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0...Du coup, en passant, ce serait bien de faire un MAX de pub à cet article.
Hein ?
Visiblement, le travail accompli par @lonnibesancon.bsky.social ne plaît pas aux désinformateurs.
Et l'article de Nature, qui met en avant ce travail, lui, il ne plaît PAS DU TOUT.
Et ça réagit fort.
Et salement.
Là, c'est notamment Martin Zizi qui s'acharne.
threadreaderapp.com/thread/19510...
Merci à @natureportfolio.nature.com de remettre ce portrait en avant! Je vous invite à le partager si vous le voulez bien sur :).
31.07.2025 21:39 — 👍 23 🔁 7 💬 0 📌 0Yep... I mean the fact that the things we find are so bad that the people we talk about are ready to do everything (harassment, intimidation, threats) to discourage us is CLEARLY the sign that we are all part of a mob right? /s
31.07.2025 21:41 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Transformed, I tell you!
SciGuardians claims stories like this prove the nefarious influence of the PubPeer mob. 🙃
Merci à @natureportfolio.nature.com de remettre ce portrait en avant! Je vous invite à le partager si vous le voulez bien sur :).
31.07.2025 21:39 — 👍 23 🔁 7 💬 0 📌 0Thanks again for sharing this!
31.07.2025 21:39 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I'm delighted to see my article on the repro crisis (doi.org/10.1145/3360...) featured in this press article!
modernsciences.org/research-rep...
Content de voir mon article sur la crise de la repro (doi.org/10.1145/3360... ) repris dans cet article de presse!
modernsciences.org/research-rep...
"Lonni Besançon victime d'abus en ligne, de menaces et de contestations judiciaires en réponse à ses enquêtes sur l'intégrité de la recherche [kof - Raoult - kof] pendant la pandémie [toujours en cours] de COVID-19."
22.07.2025 14:08 — 👍 12 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 0Thanks for sharing
30.07.2025 12:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Thank you so much for these words
30.07.2025 12:57 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Lonni is spectacular and absolutely deserves this kind of positive attention!
22.07.2025 19:28 — 👍 11 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0#harassment #cyberbullying #scientificintegrity
"In posts on Twitter, Besançon’s harassers wrongly accused him of Nazism, sexual harassment and responsibility for thousands of deaths from COVID-19 vaccines. He has also received death threats for his science advocacy."
Lonni Besançon faced online abuse, threats and legal challenges in response to his research integrity sleuthing during the COVID-19 pandemic
go.nature.com/4m5DN0X
Thank you @natureportfolio.nature.com for sharing this article!
28.07.2025 07:16 — 👍 28 🔁 7 💬 0 📌 0EXCELLENT READ.
Good work. Here’s one example:
“Besançon … pointed out major concerns with the hydroxychloroquine study’s design, …6 people treated (…26 participants) dropped out of the study and were disregarded in the analysis. Of those 6, 1 person died and 3 were moved into intensive care.”