This, to me, is the delight of meteorology-poetical research. Things like these go everywhere.
23.02.2026 06:45 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@lootwijk.bsky.social
Remember to skim the sides to avoid clattering.
This, to me, is the delight of meteorology-poetical research. Things like these go everywhere.
23.02.2026 06:45 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I still think you ought to just push him down the stairs.
21.02.2026 23:39 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Oh, it’s so good. Also, I can never fathom why people would want any other bass sound than this. Just listen to that dunu-dunu-dunu.
21.02.2026 10:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That is actually arrestingly beautiful.
18.02.2026 21:20 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Good that you did. And, yes, damn.
18.02.2026 21:19 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You will be happy you read this. I promise.
buttondown.com/monteiro/arc...
I have never seen someone cease the moment like this young fellow. An absolute wonder.
14.02.2026 20:38 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I think this theory has feet! And good ones!
13.02.2026 14:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Jag höll på att säga att all motivation är påhittad, men det är bara för att jag försöker vara finurlig. Det slår mig att du har ett bra språk. Det visste jag egentligen redan, från förr, då man skrev på det riktiga internet! Kram & kram. 🌸
11.02.2026 13:25 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Oh, ETC! Good man. Jag var rätt peppad på den, men norrut i landet finns det inga alternativ än dum-Telia.
11.02.2026 06:45 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Oh my, there is a lot to discover here. Statement to our time, all that.
09.02.2026 08:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Man, that is one ligne claire interface.
04.02.2026 21:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Oh come ON! This is gold!
03.02.2026 19:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I have always liked this one.
03.02.2026 19:27 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I had not. Wow! I was going to say this has more of a cold freeway night ride feeling to it, while Gilmour’s version sounds like hunkering down on a barn rooftop while it’s snowing.
31.01.2026 10:53 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0All the time. ☀️
31.01.2026 10:44 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That song has been with me nearly all my life.
31.01.2026 10:41 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This extends in a good direction, I think.
31.01.2026 10:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Does your robot understand the language in that? Have the two of you talked at such length that this lovingly typeset instruction is functional?
30.01.2026 08:12 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0(under his breath) Way of the FUTURE.
30.01.2026 06:44 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That does sound pretty bad.
29.01.2026 23:13 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Oh okay. Jiminy. I’m not sure how the Senate works, but isn’t it also a question of the support he gets (or doesn’t)?
29.01.2026 22:45 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0What guy? Sanders?
29.01.2026 22:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This is fucking awesome. Dude still knows how to put hope into music.
28.01.2026 23:22 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Compute must on!
28.01.2026 13:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Perfect!
27.01.2026 22:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I see what you mean, yeah. It used to be easy to write them off as kooks, especially from over here. But maybe their fanaticism has become so malign that there is no coming back from it.
27.01.2026 21:26 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0That is interesting. I’m thinking, if they were to lose Trump – if he, let’s say, fell down some stairs – they would lose their one idol and they would implode. Wouldn’t they?
27.01.2026 21:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It is truly awful. But it also cannot last. 🕯️
25.01.2026 15:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The link works. The article is really good. And I am over here, terrified.
25.01.2026 06:33 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0