🔥 Rustic Campfire

🔥 Rustic Campfire

@rusticcampfire.bsky.social

Stop all wars now 🔴 Scientific philosopher 🔴 Always talk to the opposite side 🔴 Your god is irrelevant 🔴 What do you live for?

32 Followers 39 Following 113 Posts Joined Nov 2024
11 months ago

oh, you still blocking people ) 🤦‍♂️

0 0 1 0
11 months ago

europeans are weak, wicked and spiteful - they don't deserve an army and won't have one.

0 0 0 0
11 months ago

your axe is completely rusted

1 0 0 0
11 months ago

yes. some people to disagree with, cause here you're just talking to yourself. pathetic.

0 0 1 0
1 year ago

if you tease a bear, and when it finally gets angry, you refuse to give its neighbour a big club to fend it off, while sitting on another continent and lecturing about how bad the bear is, doesn't that make you a disgrace? that's my question.

0 0 0 0
1 year ago

will any dems admit they are wrong, i wonder?

1 0 0 0
1 year ago

democrats are not tolerant at all. they only ‘tolerant’ to those who agree with them.

0 0 0 0
1 year ago

the masacre in gaza must end

1 0 0 0
1 year ago

it’s amazing that we have elon musk )

0 0 0 0
1 year ago

i think you confused input and output. a being theoretically could be unlimited in their input, perception and understanding, but limited in their output, actions.

0 0 1 0
1 year ago

many fairytales ‘explain’ something. maybe even most of them.

0 0 1 0
1 year ago

what makes it different from a fairytale then?

0 0 1 0
1 year ago

disgusting

0 0 0 0
1 year ago

i’m just saying that this omnipresence of numbers requires explanation.

0 0 0 0
1 year ago

we clearly discovered numbers, not invented them.

btw, letter C, you referred to, doesn’t demonstrate such omnipresence

0 0 0 0
1 year ago

every new humans we met were familiar with numbers. moreover, we can’t imagine species of any kind who, let’s say travel to space and don’t know numbers.

this omnipresence of numbers can’t be rationally explained by „species accidentally invent the same thing over and over again”.

0 0 2 0
1 year ago

definitely so. number 3 is an example.

0 0 1 0
1 year ago

'science' is equal to 'knowledge we can trust'. every knowledge outside of this set is not trustworthy.

0 0 1 0
1 year ago

i mean that number 3 exists regardless of whether anyone or anything perceives or understands it

0 0 1 0
1 year ago

neither a perceiving system. this number won’t disappear even if there is nothing but rocks around.

0 0 1 0
1 year ago

for number 3 to exist no humans, minds or brains are needed.

0 0 2 0
1 year ago

what are bright sights of the religion?

1 0 0 0
1 year ago

can information be created at the first place?

0 0 1 0
1 year ago

and what? kill them all? how’re you going to peacefully coexist with reps?

0 0 0 0
1 year ago

to make dems and reps to talk to each other again.

0 0 0 0
1 year ago

lack of pleasures irl? cause if you only talk to the ones who agree, it’s not a discussion but a self-pleasuring.

0 0 0 0
1 year ago

mind is a program that runs in the brain

0 0 0 0
1 year ago

an instance of an information is indeed a particular interaction of molecules. the information this instance represents is not.

a song recording or a performance is an interaction of molecules. the song itself is not.

0 0 0 0
1 year ago

it’s not clear how information influence physical world. it feels like it does, but physics says that only two things influence physical stuff:
- other physical stuff
- randomness

0 0 1 0
1 year ago

information is a real thing. numbers are real, so is math.

0 0 0 0