New post at the Stan Stack, where we explore why some dudes try to structure metaethics on "having reasons" and why they lack good reasons to do so.
open.substack.com/pub/stanpatt...
@stanpatton.bsky.social
Husband & 'Dada.' Sellout game design director & social product analyst. Philosophy frienemy. stanpatton.substack.com
New post at the Stan Stack, where we explore why some dudes try to structure metaethics on "having reasons" and why they lack good reasons to do so.
open.substack.com/pub/stanpatt...
Lance Bush @lanceindependent.bsky.social and I wrote a takedown of "intuitions" as a normatively-laden concept deserving justificatory weight out of the gate. It's past time to give that notion the heave-ho.
open.substack.com/pub/lanceind...
From its description, "1000-Word Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology is a constantly growing collection of over 200 original essays on important philosophical topics. These essays are introductions rather than argumentative articles."
However, Nathan Nobis recently wrote this article:
An indictment of the terms "reliable" and "unreliable" in serious attempts at philosophy, and problems with "-ible/-able" terms generally.
open.substack.com/pub/stanpatt...
I'll know it when I see it!
04.07.2025 17:16 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Latest philosophy post up at the StanStack. I don't post these very often, driving scarcity & value.
#philsky #philosophy
open.substack.com/pub/stanpatt...
Everyone's Problem
30.05.2025 21:49 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0"If you do away with the yoke of oppression,
with the pointing finger and malicious talk,
and if you spend yourselves on behalf of the hungry
and satisfy the needs of the oppressed,
then your light will rise in the darkness,
and your night will become like the noonday."
- Isaiah 58
"We could never have loved the earth so well if we had had no childhood in it." - Mary Ann Cross
20.03.2025 15:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Turns out, you can show that goodness is bad using pure Facts & Logic. No "feelies" here!
open.substack.com/pub/stanpatt...
Two years ago a 50-year-old mystery in Conway's Game of Life was solved. A pattern was discovered that cannot be generated by anything except for itself -- there's no way to procedurally build it within the ruleset.
conwaylife.com/forums/viewt...
Check out my chat with Dr. Lance Bush about how many boxes to take in Newcomb's Paradox.
#philosophy #philsky
www.youtube.com/live/pNwGnxd...
When we see what sorts of human foibles Newcomb's Paradox "trolls," it helps us unravel other thought experiments that continue to haunt philosophers even though they should have been dissolved long ago.
#philosophy #philsky
open.substack.com/pub/stanpatt...
After several months, a new article is up at the StanStack. There's a lot here; I hope you get something out of it.
#philosophy #philsky
stanpatton.substack.com/p/minmaxing-...
We aren't used to talking in the most philosophically safe & coherent framings. This is an issue because "philosophical intuition" probably = "how we're used to framing things."
16.01.2025 17:10 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It is not important for responsibility that you can *actually* do otherwise, only that you could do otherwise *under a counterfactual*. Whether a "yes" is inculpating depends on the job or jobgiver(s).
Responsibility was never some ontological property. It's just a component of stewarding practice.
"This is not a picture of screw X" is how building this bunk bed is going.
02.01.2025 05:41 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0If someone is using straight bivalent deduction to persuade you of something, watch out.
There's a weird trick that religious (and anti-religious) apologists and other attention-grabbing folks do all the time:
#philosophy #philsky
open.substack.com/pub/stanpatt...
Out: "Is Die Hard a Christmas movie?"
In: "Is most philosophical chatter variations on βIs Die Hard a Christmas movie?β?β
#philsky #philosophy
open.substack.com/pub/stanpatt...
I've found when people act like this it usually just means they can't find it again, or they misremembered it, or whatever, and they're going weird as a result.
09.12.2024 19:35 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It claimed that the benefit is even higher on shared roads, but I am interested in a source for what you are saying.
09.12.2024 18:53 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Here's a meta:
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
You can ride a bike without a helmet. It takes extra time to find and don the helmet, and it feels awkward. Riding without that bulk is quicker and more comfy, even if it invites big risks.
Framing "potential" as a property of an object is like riding without a helmet.
"Does this person worship the same God as that person?" has a boringly definitive answer, but definitive answers kill conversations, and dead conversations tell no tales.
02.12.2024 15:48 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Only a fool would M. C. Eschew this
01.12.2024 16:32 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"Evidence" does not have a tight meaning, so people will hop from neutral to arbitrarily laden meanings of it.
All polysemy is an opportunity for rhetoricians.
A new way to approach Newcomb's Paradox that makes it more intuitive that the only rational choices are "reject the scenario" or "1-box."
#philsky #philosophy
In epistemology, raise one eyebrow super high whenever you see a syllogism that treats the word "reliable" as if it is a "yes or no" thing, with a single probabilistic threshold to "count."
26.11.2024 19:31 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I wanted the commemorative boot glass but also the stout they limit to 8 oz pours...
24.11.2024 23:02 β π 20 π 1 π¬ 4 π 0