It's a nice coming-out party for the paper. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...
30.05.2025 10:40 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@jwaldfog.bsky.social
It's a nice coming-out party for the paper. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...
30.05.2025 10:40 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I had a lot of fun discussing the growth of female authorship on the Today, Explained podcast. open.spotify.com/episode/2XGc...
30.05.2025 10:40 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Our bottom line: there is a lot of regret and missed opportunity in current differentiated product consumption (and not just with gifts).
27.01.2025 22:29 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0...and the relationship between individualsโ tendency to own games and the gamesโ average playtimes supports this assumption. We do a bunch of other stuff to explore robustness.
27.01.2025 22:29 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Nerdy caveats: Our users choose among 100 games; we make the bundle choice problem tractable by specifying utility as a function of hours of playtime and money spent. This presumes that marginal utilities of different games are proportional to the playtime they deliver.
27.01.2025 22:29 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Second, using a model of game bundle choice, we measure the welfare gain from full information as the loss of money to bring consumers from full information down to their status quo choices. Full information would raise CS by 30 percent more than baseline expenditure.
27.01.2025 22:29 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0We develop a two-part model for measuring the welfare gain with full information. First, full information would raise the size of the budget set by allowing consumers to buy the games yielding the most playtime first.
27.01.2025 22:29 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0We have unusual data on post-purchase usage providing big hints about regret: Users could have achieved 90 percent of their status quo playtime with 60 percent less expenditure.
27.01.2025 22:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0We donโt know much about this, for two reasons. 1) we rarely see post-purchase usage, 2) welfare analysis proceeds from assumptions of revealed preference. If you paid 10 dollars for something, it must have been worth at least 10 dollars to you.
27.01.2025 22:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0With differentiated products and heterogeneous consumers, it may be hard for choices to deliver maximal welfare. We might regret choices we make, and we might miss out on products we would have enjoyed. @imkereimers.bsky.social, Christoph Riedl, and I explore this www.nber.org/papers/w33401
27.01.2025 22:29 โ ๐ 11 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 1The EU's Digital Markets Act has outlawed self-preferencing by big platforms. Shortly after Amazon's designation as a "gatekeeper" in 9/23, the search rank advantage for Amazon-brand products fell a bunch. Working paper: www.nber.org/papers/w32299
08.04.2024 17:14 โ ๐ 9 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0