Julian

Julian

@juliangrove.bsky.social

insert bluesky bio https://juliangrove.github.io/

103 Followers 168 Following 456 Posts Joined Sep 2023
10 hours ago

anyone planning to go to SALT this year?

1 0 0 0
4 days ago

Claude is short for Jean Claude Van Damme. Are you saying Jean Claude Van Damme does not have consciousness? Because I agree with you.

627 68 12 2
4 days ago

Crap, I can't do it - I can't explain how consciousness works.

2 0 0 0
1 week ago

feeling very jokingly belittled by this

1 0 0 0
1 week ago

Making an assertion having chosen silence from the alternative set.

3 0 0 1
1 week ago

Been tinkering with schemas for sharing language data over ATProto (the technology that underlies bluesky). Trying to support everything from acceptability and inference judgments to interlinear glossing to syntactic parses to eye and neural recordings. Discussion and comments appreciated. 🐦️🐦️

19 6 2 1
2 weeks ago

can you share what the message was?

1 0 0 0
2 weeks ago

Yeah, if I ever get to teach a "math foundations for ling" course, I think I might pull this out.

1 0 0 0
2 weeks ago
Alligator Eggs!

worrydream.com/AlligatorEggs/

1 0 1 0
2 weeks ago

They should do a remake of the 2001 Steven Spielberg movie and get Haley Joel Osment to play chatgpt

1 0 0 0
2 weeks ago

Thank you! I'll take a look.

1 0 0 0
3 weeks ago

Yeah, agree that's better.

2 0 0 0
3 weeks ago

(2) Mary expects to have a baby. The baby is due in March.

Totally fine, right? What's going on here, anaphora to an individual concept or something like that?

0 0 1 0
3 weeks ago

They suggest it's made ok by the fact that it's possible to name a baby before the baby is born. I think this is meant to help explain why 'the baby's name' doesn't seem so bad. But I'm wondering why the embedded 'the baby' itself doesn't seem so bad. Compare:

0 0 1 0
3 weeks ago

Talking about Discourse Referents this week. A student says they think

(1) Mary expects to have a baby. The baby's name is Sue.

is fine, and I'm not sure I disagree. I wonder what might be going on there.

2 0 2 0
3 weeks ago

(sorry for the double reply)

0 0 0 0
3 weeks ago

'Wuthering Heights' is the name of the new Alex Honnold documentary.

0 0 1 0
3 weeks ago

I'm afraid of heights

4 0 1 0
3 weeks ago

naming by abstract review Bob

0 0 0 0
3 weeks ago

Wow this is so true in a very real way

0 0 0 0
3 weeks ago

I don't know if he'd be any worse to accept donations from than people like Bill Gates or companies like Amazon. My point was more just that if you're applying for federal grants, then it's hard for me to see why you'd prefer one agency over another for moral reasons, assuming the same obligations.

1 0 0 0
3 weeks ago

Kind of wonder how make much difference it makes which taxpayer funded agency awards a particular grant, all else equal (which it might not be, practically speaking). Epstein, on the other hand, is maybe not someone you want to take money from for independent reasons.

1 0 1 0
3 weeks ago

admire the fruit

2 0 0 0
1 month ago

would love to say that's what happened, but I literally just forgot how 'break' is spelled

0 0 1 0
1 month ago

*break

1 0 1 0
1 month ago

Take a short brake, see if I get thirsty, maybe watch the bad bunny halftime show

1 0 1 0
1 month ago

Schwarzdchild*

0 0 0 0
1 month ago

I kind of feel about it the same way I do about schwarzchild 1999 re: level of fun

0 0 0 0
1 month ago

Wrapping up Katzir 2007 in my pragmatics class. Man what a fun paper.

1 0 2 0
1 month ago

yeah, and it also causes lung cancer

1 0 1 0