Hey @aimod.social users π Iβve seen the messages about the labeler and wanted to say the team is ok and weβre so grateful for how much it meant to you. Weβre sorting some things out and canβt share details yet, but the plan is still to bring it back. Thanks so much for the supportβmore updates soon.
26.12.2025 15:03 β π 287 π 65 π¬ 10 π 17
Hey all, the team and I at @aimod.social are temporarily shutting down the labeler. I can't go into detail, but we discovered issues that could put me or the team at risk. We'll bring it back once weβre confident it's safe. Thank you so much for your understanding and for believing in us.
05.12.2025 02:25 β π 1126 π 329 π¬ 34 π 102
We are sorry for the interruption. Maintenance is being performed, service will be restored soon.
05.12.2025 02:36 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 2 π 2
Paging @kenwhite.bsky.social, @akivamcohen.bsky.social, and @kathryntewson.bsky.social in case they have an opinion on this.
05.12.2025 01:07 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 2 π 4
Right, sorry, I misread what you meant.
I... went and checked the API. It... might be doable...
I'm wondering if I shouldn't just... do it... It'd work the same way as the listification app, where you'd follow the bot, and it'd DM you for labels...
... ugh, like I need an nth project to do.
Hmf.
05.12.2025 00:23 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Detail about that last point: it doesn't tell you when your account gets labeled, it tells you when it's added to a list. There is currently no tool whatsoever able to notify you when a label is applied to an account, nor a post.
WHICH IS PAINFUL, let me tell you, even for us.
@bsky.app please!
04.12.2025 22:57 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Omg.
04.12.2025 22:40 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Only 33% of our users use our labels to totally reduce visibility.
I agree with you, but never ever getting false positives is near impossible, especially with how AI works nowadays. We try our best to prioritize appeals, so labels don't appear for too long. Silver lining, I know.
I may help that most users don't use us to fully block or hide what we label:
04.12.2025 19:35 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean exactly with first hour?
In this specific case, the post was made on 11/5, and the label was applied a month later, long after the first hour of visibility, and got appealed and removed quickly.
04.12.2025 19:29 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Of course! Don't hesitate to @ me if there's anything else I can help with in the future.
04.12.2025 19:28 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
This is unfortunately out of our hands, and this is how Bluesky's moderation system has been built. We're dependent on their infrastructure for moderation that is. I totally agree with you that the label should probably at least say "under appeal".
This sort of feedback should be sent to @bsky.app.
04.12.2025 18:29 β π 12 π 0 π¬ 4 π 2
We try to answer appeals quickly and in priority. I got to yours just now.
04.12.2025 18:22 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Label has been removed.
04.12.2025 18:21 β π 25 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Sorry, took a little while. Finally got to a desk, and Bluesky is being insanely slow today...
You should've been removed now.
04.12.2025 18:17 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Rhaaaa, why isn't synchronizing...?!
I'll go and manually remove you from the list. It's supposed to be in sync with the labels. You had one briefly, before it was removed after an appeal, but bluesky's pipes are just really bad lately...
Just woke up, I'll edit the list once I'm on a computer.
04.12.2025 15:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
??? What label ?
04.12.2025 14:47 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0
No, it does not. The third party moderation system of bluesky ignores and bypasses the blocking system entirely.
27.11.2025 00:49 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
There's unfortunately been a lot of hiccups since this update indeed. Try again now?
25.11.2025 12:11 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
We're here to help over at @aimod.social
24.11.2025 13:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Fixed now. You should be able to resume reporting stuff to us. Thanks again for letting us know.
20.11.2025 03:27 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Oh gods, what now...
Thank you for letting us know. This update probably broke custom labelers. Hopefully it's as simple as updating our backend.
Ugh.
19.11.2025 20:21 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
When you report an entire profile for one AI image, it forces us to review the entire profile's media history. Doing this causes us more work than is necessary, please report the individual post in this case.
18.11.2025 20:59 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Quote post since I can't reply.
See bsky.app/profile/anti...
It's on Bluesky, not us. The label was removed from our system, but they still haven't propagated the change.
16.11.2025 07:42 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
The label is applied to the whole account, not this post specifically.
10.11.2025 18:00 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
We're not automated. It's all done by hand, by humans.
08.11.2025 13:31 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
I don't see any label on their account? Are you sure it's from us?
29.10.2025 04:12 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
The label was applied in February when you had a different profile picture. I have appealed and removed the label for you, and the list should synchronize itself automatically, but there can be a lag.
28.10.2025 19:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Of course. Thank you for notifying us.
22.10.2025 19:53 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
I have removed the labels, and we'll do an internal review with the moderators to understand how we got this one so wrong. That definitely shouldn't have happened, and I apologize sincerely.
22.10.2025 19:17 β π 12 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Honestly, it made us do a double take ourselves, so there's nothing to be embarrassed about. We believe there's been photoshop work done on it on top of the original gen-AI result they got. But the base was most likely gen-AI, yes.
22.10.2025 18:33 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0