I did offer an alternative, and you called that limiting one’s expression. Having a personal Instagram, and an Instagram for fashion isn’t the most far fetched idea in the world. Anyway. I’m done.
31.05.2025 04:31 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@glacialglow.bsky.social
i actually understand what the cocteau twins are saying [IG & XHS: glacialglow]
I did offer an alternative, and you called that limiting one’s expression. Having a personal Instagram, and an Instagram for fashion isn’t the most far fetched idea in the world. Anyway. I’m done.
31.05.2025 04:31 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I have indeed googled it, and it would seem the consensus from a clinical standpoint is mixed. Anyway, I tried to get a point across here without this seeming like a personal attack, and evidently that didn’t work, so let’s end this here.
31.05.2025 04:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I’m not telling anyone to limit their methods of expression? Jfashion is a hobby, age regression is something personal. Respectfully, I won’t be discussing this any further because there’s no point.
31.05.2025 04:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I don’t know what to tell you. Ultimately, this is going to be an ongoing problem within the jfashion community until age regression and jfashion are no longer mixed.
31.05.2025 04:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0It’s part of who you are, but I don’t see how it has to be mixed with jfashion. Plenty of people have multiple accounts, like an OOTD/collector account and a personal account? This isn’t the attack you think it is. It’s just about keeping people safe.
31.05.2025 04:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0You’ve read me wrong. I meant the theft of hashtags is irrelevant in the sense that presently, both sides of the age regression community use these hashtags regardless, and thus the association with jfashion continues
31.05.2025 04:07 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0That may be so, but as I’ve said to OP, an easy solution is to simply separate the two to stop predatory age regressors violating the boundaries of the jfashion community.
31.05.2025 04:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Regardless, considering how this keeps happening with the theft of hashtags, why is making a separate account solely for age regression such a big ask? It would be an easy solution to stop predators within the age regression community targeting jfashion accounts.
31.05.2025 04:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I don’t care if they stole them, that’s irrelevant at this point. The fact is they ARE used by both sides of the age regression community, and there is a moral responsibility to keep jfashion out of it for the sake of people’s boundaries.
31.05.2025 03:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0So when you’re involved in age regression and you’re aware there is a sizeable NSFW community within that realm, it really isn’t a big ask to keep age regression separate from jfashion. It’s just about keeping people safe, bearing in mind there’s a fair few minors who wear jfashion too.
31.05.2025 03:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0You’ve literally proved my point re: the hashtags. Both SFW and NSFW age regressors use the same tags, which in turn directs them to jfashion accounts. All we’re asking for is boundaries to be respected, and they aren’t, because SFW agere is a gateway for NSFW agere to gain access to our community.
31.05.2025 03:55 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0If people feel inclined to regress, they ought to be doing this on a separate social media account independently of wearing jfashion. Jfashion fundamentally has nothing to do with age regression and the two should not be conflated.
31.05.2025 03:42 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0The problem is SFW age regressors who wear jfashion still encourage NSFW age regressors to infiltrate our community, since SFW and NSFW both use many of the same terms for their proclivity. As a result, it perpetuates this idea that jfashion is part of a f*tish.
31.05.2025 03:42 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0A bell pepper in the fetal position
Same, little pepper, same
26.03.2025 14:04 — 👍 10444 🔁 1839 💬 94 📌 75Forming a prayer circle for Rachel Reeves (we’re praying something terrible happens to her)
26.03.2025 06:46 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Can always wish even worse upon them :)
18.03.2025 21:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I agree with you one hundred percent!
18.03.2025 21:04 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I wish Liz Kendall, Keir Starmer & Rachel Reeves a very sudden, unfortunate & life changing event, so they might understand what life is like for disabled people. Truly, from the bottom of my heart: fuck you, every MP who supports your proposals & every member of the public who thinks this is okay.
18.03.2025 20:48 — 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 0Labour might see me as inferior for being disabled, but I’m pretty sure I have more brain cells than all of their cabinet members combined. How is this not going to be an absolute fucking shitshow?
13.03.2025 14:49 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Up to 10,000 job roles are going to be scrapped. That means up to 10,000 more people out of work and having to seek employment in a job market where opportunities are scarce…and yet they expect long term sick and disabled people to also find jobs???
13.03.2025 14:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0RE: abolishing NHS England…so basically, the NHS is for the interim period going to be even less fit for purpose - and this could last some time - just as Labour has announced proposals to force disabled and long term sick people into work, many of whom are on waiting lists for treatment? Right. 🫠
13.03.2025 14:43 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The urge to buy myself a little treat is so strong when I’m feeling this bad. So far, I’m resisting, but…for how long
13.03.2025 13:17 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0My mental health has really not been good lately, and I think the Labour government implying that people like me are not worthy of support and better off dead *might* have something to do with it
12.03.2025 20:43 — 👍 27 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Also @theguardian.com - why are you giving this dr a platform? A dr who specialises in psychosomatic illness has no business deciding that autism & ADHD are conditions that are just “in people’s heads”. Given that so many neurodivergent people aren’t believed, it’s especially disgusting.
01.03.2025 22:16 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hey, The Guardian. Why have you published this toxic article, written by a clearly biased doctor who labels autistic and ADHD people as “unhealthy”? Do you realise how harmful this rhetoric is? Shame on you, and shame on Dr. Suzanne O’Sullivan. www.theguardian.com/society/2025... @theguardian.com
01.03.2025 21:50 — 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I’m a big skin picker and I’ve spent so long trying to break the cycle. Letting your partner know you have the urge to pick can be a big help, because then they can distract you! But it’s tough and I don’t have a permanent fix yet :(
24.02.2025 15:32 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I have an idea for people wanting to send anything to HR@opm.gov - a graphic description of every shit you took in the past week 😌
24.02.2025 15:30 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Mine is Gengar, Cresselia, Mew (all Ex) with Dusknoir and Gardevoir as my “helpers”. Tbh, I’m thinking of swapping out Mew for a shield - Druddigon is a fantastic idea 😏
17.02.2025 17:30 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It’s me and my Psychic deck against the world…except for when I come across opponents who cheese the game with Pidgeot Ex or the multiple Palkia cards + Manaphy combo. The latter pisses me off more. That said, I’ve outsmarted someone using the Palkia strat several times 😌
17.02.2025 15:33 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0So Pokémon TCGP has made me discover that I’m actually rather good at strategy, and am a ruthless mfer in battles. This game is already turning me into a monster
17.02.2025 15:28 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0