I've been doing more research and thinking about this recently -- the merits of porting this into an engine vs. building out the engine features I'd need for a game myself. I'm increasingly favoring the path of doing a custom engine, for a range of reasons, but the jury's still out
Ok, this is relatable
Currently, all the light sources in my small-voxel renderer are dynamic (though without inter-object shadows). I didn't demo this in the new YouTube video, but somebody asked about it in the comments, so here's a quick example.
Thanks! Though needless to say, I'm making some very particular tradeoffs to get there, compared to a general-purpose modern renderer...
Thanks! And yeah, shadows are something I'll be thinking about in the future. I mention this briefly in the blog post in the thread
Thank you!
For more information on what I've been up to and where I plan to go with this project from here, or to get in touch, see this blog post: blog.danielschroeder.me/blog/voxel-r...
I've made a new trailer-style video to show where the project stands today. Make sure to watch to the end... www.youtube.com/watch?v=bN9n...
To add those elements, I now support voxelizing detailed triangle meshes, producing voxel meshes that match the aesthetic of the environment geometry. The voxelizer tolerates off-the-shelf assets and produces good results across foliage, characters, and hard-surface meshes.
In last year's work, I modeled the environment as low-poly geometry and used textures with displacement maps to apply fine voxel detailing. This workflow is efficient for structures and terrain, but it can't handle things like foliage, small props, or animated characters.
Here's an update on my small-voxel renderer, inspired by the look of games like Doom and Quake. The work I shared last year focused on handling simpler environment geometry. Since then, I've greatly expanded the scope of what I can depict in this art style. More info in thread.
The pain is real. I had a mouse that developed this a few days before a deadline when I didn't have time to go buy a replacement. Much annoyance ensued
He, to be very clear, meaning me
Having no gameplay beyond being able to walk around? Nothing wrong with that, he says, self-servingly
Left feels practical, right has more personality IMO. Right feels like the posture of someone who feels threatened
I ran into this too recently, though not as a user. I was researching the APIs and their differences, and discovered that the early bug reports on the "gpuweb" spec repo are a great resource for discovering these differences.
I experimented with the same trick recently. Very useful when you're lighting an area with non-shadow-casting lights and don't want to use a huge number of them. Being able to configure *per light* what fraction of the light is ambient is also useful
Only took a quick look so far, but the interactive demos are very cool!
When I'm looking for info about how older engines solved problems, I try to find old modding community websites that are still active. There's usually somebody who has compiled this kind of information, or links to it
Getting there...
I took care of that days ago but my suitcase is still half packed. Results inconclusive.
OK, now this is super intriguing. Will have to look into your plugin...
Yikes. Thankfully I haven't met many people who talk this way. That said, I bet a lot of us have made the mistake of getting carried away and talking for too long about something we're working on that we care about. I sure have
Heck, I didn't even get sick and I feel destroyed. It's a draining week!
That's a wrap for GDC 2025! Thank you to everyone who met with me this week -- I got to have a lot of interesting conversations this year
Mixamo's Romero getting a glow-up?
Ooh, this looks nice. Brown or otherwise, one of the things that I think games from this era did well is to lean into an opinionated, stylized color palette
It makes me happy to see a big IP being willing to go for a project like this
Thank you! I really appreciate that
