[ΠΠΠ‘]
Personally, it didn't bother me at all. Perhaps I felt irritation or angry. But those feelings quickly passed. I could also have been driven to such emotions by others. So everything is fine.
Although some of your nasty or sarcastic comments actually made me laugh. So don't worry about me.
All the problems that existed could have been solved by simply discussing everything. After thinking and without making hasty decisions.
This is all.
There were no discussions with the participants and their opinions were not asked.
...
The conclusions drawn were incorrect. You still need to think about it.
This document only created more questions than it answered. Especially considering the omissions that exist. β
But what destroyed the server was /poor moderation/.
There was no division of responsibilities, decisions were not made by everyone, information about problems was hiding from other moderators , and their suggestions or opinions were ignored. β
And that was your main mistake: Take responsibility and make decisions where you are bad.
Even to me, as an outside observer, itβs clear that the reason for the serverβs destruction was poor moderation. Yes, there were some moments from server members. β
...
If you decided to give advice, the first thing you should have said was, "Don't take on more than you can handle." Because /you/ took on what you can't handle.
and without prior discussion.
This is what crashed the server.
....
Considering your words and reactions to complaints, (taken from the document) your thinking on /moderator should decide/ was "decide for yourself first." Which is also a problem.
complaints were ignored/were not taken seriously.
After solving the problems, no preventative measures or discussions . Adopted false conclusions that led to hasty decisions /without initial discussion with the participants/.
"Attack" on participants due to hasty conclusions β
You don't understand the reason for the server's collapse at all. And you can't give anyone advice, especially considering It was your decisions that led to the collapse. And most importantly, the conclusions were false.
Major decisions were made without input from participants,β
But you, as modders, should have raised the issue and calmly discussed it without accusing anyone.
You cannot call this document "Server History", even with the "from my side" note.(Although by the end of the document this mark had disappeared.)
...
Also, you can't give advice. β
Because if you had discussed this with the participants /and asked for their opinion/ it would have been easily resolved.
...
This whole document is just a typical story told to a friend on emotions.
Yes, there were moments when the participants did some nonsense. β
was made /without discussing it with others participants/ and the rule was "ban for 1 hour in case of "..." ."
You rolled out a rather serious rule without discussing it with the /participants server/. It was a serious decision, over what seemed like nonsense to me. β
Yes, of course, it was still hypocritical on the part of some players.
BUT it wasn't as bad as the moderators made it out to be. +But shouldn't forget that there were problems with this "non-server" participant. This is also an important factor.
Why didn't you say that your new rule β
non-server member, even though you yourself are doing the same."
Quietly omitting the fact that this 17 year old was rude to many and the participants did not like it. And the fact that this person raised some terrible things through RP only worsened the opinion of they. β
And most importantly, /without the consent of other participants/.
This "proposal" /was a fact/, and besides, the "voting" lasted 2-3 days? Seriously? Why isn't this mentioned?
Another case. There was a point in the document where they said "they were outraged by the actions of a 17-year-old β
Also they donβt even thought it over carefully AND donβt ask the participantsβ opinions.
...
Also, many events are presented in a twisted manner.
For example, a moment with a restart. The opinion was adopted /quickly, without the consent of all the moderators/. β
...
It was not even mentioned here that some of the moderators' decisions were made hastily.I know of several cases where the moderation team made a decision without waiting for the opinion of other mods because they were at work or sleeping. β
The one who was asked to be banned as a pro-shipper and "god-mod".
/This guy created many other problems/. But this is only mentioned superficially or not mentioned at all.
And so here about other events, I wouldnβt be surprised if something was missed or left unsaid. β
When the situation with minors on the server escalated (before the server became +18) A member aged 16 has been added to our server.
/That/ was also a reason. But the document doesn't mention it.
...
There was also little information about one participant who was banned. β
was aggressive, possessive, and did some incomprehensible shit.Damn fucking,/sexua@ harassment/ and manipulation of a server member!
The fact that he is a "collective trauma of the server." This was one of the biggest and most serious problems on the server.
.....
Πlso an omission about minors.β
...
In my opinion, too little attention has been paid to the main events that caused the collapse.
Regarding the story with Quinn(Harrow), you didn't attach a document(which is also public) and didn't say /to what extent/ it was a problem. You didn't even mention how he pestered the participants,β
everything that was written there, like a teacher.
There is a lot left unsaid here; there are no details, examples, or even names. You presented this as a document "server history from your side", but everything is superficial. Especially for what you decided to make /public/. β
what I heard from others. βΌοΈ
*cough* So.
I'm thinking of adding the note "This is all from my perspective." It should have been done in /capital/ letters. And remove "server history".
But even so, after reading this document. I wanted to take a red pen and sit and correct β
[OOC]
Using a translator certainly slowed down my reaction to this document. (14 pages bro, too many letters Ρ
Π΄Π΄)
βΌοΈDisclaimer! Everything below is just my observation. I'm one of those guys who missed most of the bullets. So everything I say is based solely on what I saw or β
[ΠΠΠ‘]
Biting you
[ΠΠΠ‘]
06.03.2026 21:22 β π 8 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0...Of course sir.
06.03.2026 21:06 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Just play along with this organic, sir.
And then you wonβt have to waste your nerves on trifles.
