Fortunately, I think it’s a false dilemma!
09.12.2025 23:24 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0@zwlevonian.bsky.social
Human–computer interaction researcher. PhD from University of Minnesota. Tacoma, WA. Mastodon: zwlevonian@hci.social
Fortunately, I think it’s a false dilemma!
09.12.2025 23:24 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0She’s just a great writer, right? Her dry, slightly sneering prose is a delight
08.12.2025 17:53 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Interesting argument, worth reading. I respect Togelius for biting the bullet and explicitly arguing that "expanding humanity's collective knowledge" is more morally important than acquiring life-saving technology developments, although I think this is a (very) hard view to support.
08.12.2025 16:42 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0I feel compelled to add that I do like Stoppard and also didn’t realize people were talking about him because he recently passed…
02.12.2025 23:45 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0:D Have you seen The Hard Problem? Truly the height of Stoppard philosophizing en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Har...
02.12.2025 23:14 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This is particularly impressive to me because Arcadia sucks! Proof you can find value in anything 🤗
02.12.2025 12:09 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This has been a challenge for cs.HC: we need folks to step up and support that category. Please contact me if you are interested in moderating either DH or HC! Thanks!
29.11.2025 19:27 — 👍 7 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 1Good response. I would add, however: (a) utm_source=chatgpt is an extremely strong negative signal about writing quality in the contexts I encounter it, and so (b) the "unfairness" OP mentions is understandable frustration. Formatting cues no longer indicate due diligence, which makes trust hard.
15.11.2025 22:16 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I regularly see critiques of pleasing-but-false ideas, but I've also had to work quite hard to shape my information feed to include that kind of information. There's a lot of low-hanging fruit here: human–computer interaction researchers should build tools that make feed-shaping easier for people.
12.11.2025 18:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Worth reading. Some nice reflections here.
11.11.2025 01:44 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0“look how much better my favorite model is compared compared to these other TRASH MODELS😒😒😒 when I specifically chose a DGP that matches my models assumptions and not the others’😌”
07.11.2025 04:13 — 👍 27 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 0Spurned fan arc?
28.10.2025 23:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Worth reading for the journalism business context, but it does no substantive engagement with Zitron’s core claims about LLMs or the surrounding market.
28.10.2025 02:47 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Wow, strong endorsement. I assume I should start with “Is Water H2O?”?
26.10.2025 03:38 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Really excellent explanation and visualization!
25.10.2025 04:05 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Feeling major #CSCW2025 FOMO this week! But I enjoyed virtual participation and I'm honored to share that I won a Best Paper Award. Here's a blog post about my study: levon003.github.io/2025/10/22/c...
22.10.2025 22:50 — 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Wow this is huge, congrats!
24.09.2025 14:04 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Love this story about how Wikipedia fends off censorship and disinformation: "Wikipedia’s first and best line of defense is to explain how Wikipedia works." www.theverge.com/cs/features/...
22.09.2025 16:44 — 👍 57 🔁 12 💬 2 📌 0Created a small tool for updating a Slack channel when new papers are added to a Zotero library. Totally free using Google Cloud Run's basic tier. levon003.github.io/2025/09/19/z...
19.09.2025 21:50 — 👍 7 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Info cards for 10 books checked out from the Internet Archive. The collection of books is eclectic, and consists of mostly 20th century reference works.
A quick love letter to the Internet Archive's free online book loans: it makes it so easy to verify extremely obscure facts! I'm constantly using it to verify info on Wikipedia.
13.09.2025 18:32 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Very nice set of material, thanks for sharing
11.09.2025 15:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Thinking again about AI as tarmac. (Here's Fred Turner, writing in 2017.) levon003.github.io/2024/05/19/m...
08.09.2025 18:00 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Did you see this podcast from last week? Probably not acceptable as a primary reading, but may be a good supplement youtu.be/WTbpdzMC20I?...
04.09.2025 02:52 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Begging for a review of the Uncrusta-burger
01.09.2025 01:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0@opinionhaver.bsky.social is it reasonable to blame qualtrics at least a little bit for the wide-spread misinterpretation of their horrible heat map visualization of click data?
26.08.2025 21:47 — 👍 14 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0This genuinely shocked me. A Qualtrics heatmap included in a 2019 Nature Comms paper, turned into a far-right meme by the Department of Homeland Security. levon003.github.io/2024/07/27/m...
26.08.2025 21:44 — 👍 54 🔁 9 💬 4 📌 1Starting to get excited for #CSCW2025! I have a paper on peer support via recommender systems in the virtual session. Recommender systems should treat people matching as a serious design goal! levon003.github.io/2025/02/25/c...
20.08.2025 17:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Great photo and congrats!!
20.08.2025 04:13 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Thanks for putting this together! Throw me in there too 🦑
19.08.2025 15:20 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The @acm-cscw.bsky.social Starter Pack is growing ahead of #CSCW2025 ! (go.bsky.app/SPumuMT) 🔥 A warm welcome to all of our new members 🔥: @imanm02.bsky.social
@jesanovi.bsky.social @shadinz.bsky.social @jaytee-ess.bsky.social @jaewonk.bsky.social @sypark9.bsky.social
New member thread 1/x