Why is affirmative action good?
08.07.2025 21:40 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@mimirmagnvs.bsky.social
Interested in too many things Faculty perverter Probably has ADHD
Why is affirmative action good?
08.07.2025 21:40 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Best heuristic in life: Don't trust pink haired people. Cudos to the family for exposing this
08.07.2025 21:27 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0herro evwywone
07.02.2025 18:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I love free speech
01.12.2024 20:09 β π 384 π 48 π¬ 12 π 1π
01.12.2024 21:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0counterproductive things
V.) On theism it is highly improbable that P(III)
C.) We have reason to doubt Gods existence, as P(IIIβ£T)< P(III|N)
(genes, damage to the brain)
IV.) From I.) it follows that God is omnibenevolent, and an omnibenevolent being would not punish humans for things that are out of their control; Planting the seeds of sin would be counterproductive to God's ends
V.) God, being a tri-omni being, would not do such
Anotha repost
I.) (Classical)Theism entails a tri-omni being
II.) This being (God) cares about humans and will punish those who do not act according to his fiat.
III.) We live in a world where one's will can be muddled/altered/subject to deterministic laws and other non-moral events
But criterion ii.) is nonsense since explanation cannot be circular because explanation presupposes explanadum. (God cannot create himself, because the action of creation presupposes existence
β΄ By modus tollens, theism is false
Explication of ii) Reflexive causation is the kind of causation/explanation wherein the the explanatory dependence is circular. Things like God creating himself (obviously not the same thing, since this is creatio ex nihilo, but this is the same type of causation)
23.11.2024 15:29 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0(ii) In order for something to be free, no sufficient cause can be explanatorily anterior to it (that's not to say that there must be no antecedent cause, it just must not be sufficient)
23.11.2024 15:29 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Defence of II.)
Libertarian free will requires the following
i.) Probabilistic causation
ii.) Reflexive causation
(i) Alone does not suffice, a system being random does not make it free. Probabilistic causation is a necessary, but not sufficient criterion for free will.
Obligatory repost from Tooter
A new argument against theism
Note: I'm referring to libertarian free will
Argument from the incoherence of free will:
I.)Theism requires free will
II.)But Free will is incoherent
C.)therefore, theism is false
Continue to be astonished how well my essay βLiberals Read, Conservatives Watch TVβ holds up. Now itβs, in addition to TV, podcasts and social media, but the point is conservatives consume more low IQ and audiovisual content. www.richardhanania.com/p/liberals-r...
22.11.2024 13:26 β π 16 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0(1) Whatever has mass also has a weight.
(2) The universe has mass.
Therefore,
(3) The universe also has a weight.
In a framework lacking gravity, the concept of "weight" is not applicable. In a framework lacking spacetime, asking what βcausedβ the universe is like asking how much it weighs.
Causation being an intrinsically spatiotemporal relation seems plausible to me, but I think you should've clarified that that was an operating assumption
21.11.2024 16:35 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Even better, Hanania and Scott Alexander
21.11.2024 04:19 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0You donβt even need to know much about the specifics of βLichtmanβs Keysβ to know itβs nonsense. Binary questions that give you a binary outcome variable. Thatβs not how the world works! Elections are probabilistic. Itβs self-evidently absurd to anyone with a scientific outlook.
20.11.2024 14:58 β π 11 π 2 π¬ 4 π 0... Is a midwits idea of a contrarian take
21.11.2024 03:39 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"Them politicians are out of touch with us common folk!!"
21.11.2024 03:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Standard populist dogma holds that the politicians are too out of touch with the wants and desires of the common folk.
In reality, they pretty much are in touch with the wants and desires of the common folk.
And that is part of the problem
www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate/...
Based take.
Populism is, and will always be bad, regardless of the flavour,be it econopopulism, health populism, right-wing reactionary populism, etc.
You did the meme (populism)
21.11.2024 03:28 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0My politics is anti-populism. Populist policies are not only wrong, they elevate the worst in man. Most peopleβs political opinions are the worst thing about them, and populism makes that central to who they are and how society is governed. www.richardhanania.com/p/populism-m...
21.11.2024 00:44 β π 41 π 3 π¬ 8 π 0