Matthew

Insults and ill-will. Bravo.

A not-guilty verdict on a theft charge ≠ a referendum on immigration enforcement. It’s a reminder that agencies need tighter operational discipline so prosecutions don’t hinge on avoidable ambiguity. That’s reform, not abolition.

Thanks for sharing — I like the idea of shaping incentives structurally rather than relying on punishment or collapse. The “pivot” option feels underused. My main question is how we design that friction in a way that’s trustworthy without becoming capture or gatekeeping.

I’m here to think clearly about systems, incentives, and moral tradeoffs — not to perform outrage.

If that’s your wavelength, hello.