& when finite wants are on an entire different scale of prices than finite needs, then the wants will always be fulfilled first

So get the fuck over yourselves & accept you already took a big ass loss on the "smart innovative capitalist" gambles hoarding needs _you_ don't need

unless delete humans

is spent on funding wants -> when unmet needs exist =

{if: infinite humans;

then: finite needs;

if: finite needs;

include: finite wants;}

{if: infinite wants;

then: delete humans;}

does that compute?

AKA

{infinite humans = finite needs;
finite humans = infinite wants;
needs = finite wants;}

hmm

well I did say pointy shit

But it all -literally, every single thing I post about - comes down to this point:

It literally does not make sense that a lack of money is a possible thing. We already proved printing what amounts to infinite money literally doesn't change anything --- except & unless the majority of the new money

Especially when the group of people allowed to endlessly fuckup is responsible for the half a mistake because somehow they're in charge of offering options

weird how this all adds up perfectly to explain my POV (if given enough time to explain /asked) but the opposing POV never adds up correctly

explained more succinctly

a tiny amount of people shouldn't get to fuckup endlessly while the vast majority, like 99.999999999999999999% of humans have half a mistake to make before they are condemned for life (ie if you were born after 1990 without enough money)

here progress means "progress through life" which means "having a life" which means "having freedom" which means "having legitimate choices that meaningfully change your circumstance" which means "having freedom from & freedom to" which means search that read about it & read about the hedgehog & fox

"The function of a system is what it does."

The monetary system - whose entire function should be

{to facilitate trade;

# (because otherwise wtf?)}

currently mostly impedes progress for the vast majority of people but for an infinitesimal percentage it allows living a literal fantasy life

?????

According to Brook's Law a lack of money should _never_ be the problem

How do you even build a system where that is a possibility?

That is fundamentally broken

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooks%...

{point being do I trust those people? why am I forced to trust them whether or not I actually trust them? this is kinda how "tech" (aka "money" and "law" aka industrialized finance aka legalized theft) is inherently invasive + violates fundamental human rights + crime = +non censensual see this url for the amusing links that you can't reach via screenshot https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/1oxe445/comment/np8pnch/

YouTube = Google, etc

Meta = facebook, all of zucks other definitely not fraudulent "business"
filing activities, etc

TikTok = the US govt somehow, etc

Linkedln = that one guy who invested in Microsoft, etc

X = the US govt somehow etc er I mean the paypal er I mean tesla er I mean spacex founder

It's worth pointing out, to be ahem as ahem absolutely ahem unambiguous

ahem as ahem possible

(also worth pointing out this is part of my reasoning built on legit well-

founded thought of why I sorta mostly support the tech companies I do, like

the ones I'm indicating here + Reddit, for now)

If "money" is ranked number one or number zero (depending on what kind of thinker you are) this would be ranked 1a or 0a (or maybe 0a would only be A? idk I'm not that flavor of thinker right now) on the list titled: Most Important Things To Always Be Unambiguous & Truthful About.

In other words, at this point, speaking metaphorically: "Mexico" already funded "the wall" if you catch my drift

Point being we already have proof if the people going without necessities right now were given that money that was given to those who spent on wasteful selfish wants, it wouldn't do anything except help rebalance "things" towards where they should've been already

The neat part about this is now we have empirical evidence that actually all that money being printed didn't actually change anything irl, what changed things is who got the free money & what it was spent on

But if "we" don't get "our" "shit" "together", unfortunately the "ads" /("advertisements") very possibly may "replace" "us"

read between the quotation marks

NIGHT-MARE ADVERTISING VISITOR TO PRIVATE ASYLUM: Incurable, you say? ATTENDANT: Utterly. Been reading advertising sheets of the big dailies. #ANCIENTADBLOCK #ISTILLDON'TKNOWHOWHASHTAGSWORK #DOTHEYWORKIFTHEYREONLYINTHEALTTEXT? #IDKLET'SFINDOUT

It doesn't have to be this way. We have the technology. We know things (more than we used to - so we should stop ahem "fooling" ahem "ourself" ahem)

Side note: I made some edits to this to make the words (etc) more clear - re-reinforcing my point about how machines can never entirely replace humans

Related to both of these images from old ass publications

& most importantly #AncientAdblock & my various decentralized assertions about how advertising is _kinda_ The Problem (& to explain the many layers of what I mean by -that- is an other complicated to explain thing)

bsky.app/profile/rele...

There's a whole ass thought process behind this that is much more complicated to explain than I feel like doing at this moment but I might do so in the future if the mood strikes - I saved some "notes" so I could explain all the interesting details

date inscribed Presented by Janet Wolfson de Botton 1996

Reinhard Mucha, Tilsit, 1987
https://botfrens.com/collections/14375/contents/1128980

YouTube video by Norma Jean - Topic /with_errors

Audio / video can, like sand, be transfigured to become less transient. Not the same as bricks, but as in the literal version of this metaphor, we use more than bricks to build things.

music.youtube.com/watch?v=wmX8...

More than I'll explain well - it's complicated (but simple).

Not sure of a better way than comparing to music:

Lots of music is off key or out of harmony / random noise - but sounds good. Not all musicians can do that well. That doesn't stop others from trying, sounding terrible and looking "dumb"

I spent like 45 minutes looking for some specific research thing I read about TLDR "noise" makes algorithms work better but I couldn't find it

Doesn't matter for comprehension because I know (more) from the human / artistic side

helpfully I've already filled in the blanks throughout my extensive post history

I have a few things I return to over and over, just from different angles

It really makes the few solid principles underlying everything hard to dispute

Similar to the nonsense in the linked post below

Wtf is up with your slang words?

Out of order, without clicking each it appears clearly sexist, and regardless an excessive amount of alt-right type insults

I understand trying to broaden appeal but wtf?

bsky.app/profile/rele...

Ok, but how are the robots going to feel when they find out ‘robot’ comes from the Czech word ‘robota’ which means “forced labor”??

I only post properganda

It needs recognized decades ago the problem often is the environment & circumstances around the person, not anything inherent w/ them

The original thought directly related to how internet regulation affects us all: Everything about internet media bypasses our normal reasoning

fill in the blanks

Much in the same way I argue we're all kinda always gonna be children deep down (ie when discussing internet regulations)

Mental health is a spectrum, mostly

Every person knows what symptoms feel like, they just don't know what it's like to feel that constantly - when the problem doesn't go away

YouTube video by Pixies - Topic Where Is My Mind?

music.youtube.com/watch?v=dmaT...