's Avatar

@chicagoish.bsky.social

46 Followers  |  87 Following  |  57 Posts  |  Joined: 30.11.2024
Posts Following

Posts by (@chicagoish.bsky.social)

Video thumbnail

Missed this stream? Join us for the next one, we're live on Twitch & YouTube every week!

17.02.2026 18:15 β€” πŸ‘ 367    πŸ” 50    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 3
Video thumbnail

Illinoisans know we need new leadership. We need new energy. I'm the only one on this stage who is willing to say that Chuck Schumer should no longer be the leader of the Democratic Party. And I believe that most Illinoisans and Democrats agree with me.

17.02.2026 01:17 β€” πŸ‘ 26    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 3

That last paragraph of the second screenshot, though, how close is that (or is it not close?) to 'a warrant signed by a judge'?

28.01.2026 19:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Antikamnia - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikam...

Wild, so the skulls were part of the marketing not any sort of caricature warning anyone about the ill effects?!

12.01.2026 21:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Flyer stapled to utility pole on Baltimore Avenue: 
GOT PROBLEMS?
Dilemmas?
GeT SeCOND RaTE ADVICe FRom
UNQUALIFIED WELL-MEANING
INDIVIDUALS
is your roommate way too loud?
your partner not showering enowh?
tinder flop after tinder flop?
Your mom text you too much? do your friends all secretly hate you? should you quit your job in this economy?? secondrateadvictu
@gmail.com
we will not disclose your personal information, this is a secret project

Flyer stapled to utility pole on Baltimore Avenue: GOT PROBLEMS? Dilemmas? GeT SeCOND RaTE ADVICe FRom UNQUALIFIED WELL-MEANING INDIVIDUALS is your roommate way too loud? your partner not showering enowh? tinder flop after tinder flop? Your mom text you too much? do your friends all secretly hate you? should you quit your job in this economy?? secondrateadvictu @gmail.com we will not disclose your personal information, this is a secret project

Got Issues?
Problems? Dilemmas?

Get Second-Rate Advice From
UΜΆnΜΆqΜΆuΜΆaΜΆlΜΆiΜΆfΜΆiΜΆeΜΆdΜΆ Well-Meaning
Individuals

09.08.2025 21:45 β€” πŸ‘ 34    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m genuinely sorry we’ve gotten into it like this, but unless I can apologize about it (meaning, close the apology loop) I don’t think it’s worth belaboring.

09.06.2025 05:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

For slang, Urban Dictionary can be better than OED, but you have to come prepared.

09.06.2025 04:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
From the etymology community on Reddit Explore this post and more from the etymology community

No, I meant what I wrote but it wasn’t directed at you. That’s part of my complaint with the medium, maybe: threading context clues suck on Threads. www.reddit.com/r/etymology/...

09.06.2025 02:22 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you and yes it is.

09.06.2025 02:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

When most of us live in cities, yes, that’s real America. Like every WW2 movie had that kid from Brooklyn or the Bronx.

09.06.2025 01:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You said β€œby how he allegedly intends to use … ” and I’m wondering what that might be? Was there a stated intent that somehow justifies it that avoids outright Posse Comitatus objections?

09.06.2025 01:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The conversation can be made more useful by having discernible comments. It may be a blusky shortcoming, but it’s exacerbated by vagueness.

09.06.2025 01:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Not even if it was spelled right, because it was already detached enough from the conversation (because of the way blusky threads the comments) that it didn’t seem to attach to any comment where β€œunder whose authority?” was a relevant question. I’m sure it made sense when you commented, in context.

09.06.2025 01:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

What’s the (important?) stated intention?

09.06.2025 01:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

The first four sentences there were extra, but that last one is the whole story.

09.06.2025 01:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Fine, but you don’t need to simp for people that can’t put a coherent thought together. I get the concept; I also see that it’s microgarbage in, microgarbage out.

09.06.2025 01:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Ok I don’t disagree with that, but it matters not whether they are from CA or TX or Fort Benning. Equally problematic.

09.06.2025 00:34 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Before I comment, could you cite the source? When you put quote marks around something I can tell you are citing someone else but I can’t tell who it might be.

09.06.2025 00:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

By the time the NG is federalized it’s the Army not β€œanother state”

09.06.2025 00:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So we’re safe as long as the tanks stay on the parade course? πŸ™„

08.06.2025 22:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Whose, you mean. You need more sentences, less half-sentences. Your replies are vague without a subject/object/verb.

08.06.2025 22:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s not β€œalmost certainly” at all. It depends how they are used. They can’t make arrests. They can protect LE.

08.06.2025 22:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Are you asking rhetorically or sarcastically? Maybe you’ve never thought about the pros and cons of each alternative.

08.06.2025 22:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I have not heard that but if Federalized troops are used, it seems like a distinction without enough difference. The NG troops can be used, but once federalized it seems to me more about how than where, when it comes to keeping it legal.

08.06.2025 22:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s never needed tanks before.

08.06.2025 22:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If you do, I’d like to put $20 on β€œnope.”

08.06.2025 21:57 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You think that would need tanks?

08.06.2025 21:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

They didn’t use or need tanks to take over Germany in the 30s.

08.06.2025 21:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s not β€œseemingly endless” when you can see the end of the train. It’s breathless hyperbole like that undermines credibility.

08.06.2025 21:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'd like to get on the alert list for future office hours or appearances, please!

14.04.2025 15:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0