Dreamy Pride's Avatar

Dreamy Pride

@dreamypride.bsky.social

Argentine πŸ”ž NSFW artist, away kiddies. English, Spanish, some German and a small amount of japanese My links (including the P site to support me): https://taplink.cc/dreamypride Do not use any of my work nor OCs for AI training or generation.

18,120 Followers  |  1,139 Following  |  850 Posts  |  Joined: 13.10.2023  |  1.8486

Latest posts by dreamypride.bsky.social on Bluesky

Video thumbnail

Priscilla's femininity and grace knows no bounds

24.11.2025 16:12 β€” πŸ‘ 6139    πŸ” 1223    πŸ’¬ 67    πŸ“Œ 9

Carpincho

23.01.2026 06:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
I write to you today to STRONGLY OPPOSE House Bill 2112 (2026) and urge you to vote against this measure in your assembly. While I appreciate the impetus behind the Bill, it will not accomplish its goals and will only serve to criminalize speech which is protected by the United States Constitution.

Firstly, and foremost, it is the responsibility of parents to police the actions of their children, to prevent them from accessing objectionable content online, and protect them from harm. This is a PARENTING PROBLEM and nearly every internet enabled hardware device comes with built-in content controls ("Parental Controls") designed to accomplish this level of content filtering and control. The legislature should not be imposing regulation on private individualsβ€”the adults legally accessing the "objectionable content" defined in HB2112β€”to address a parenting problem. Encourage parents to be more involved and engaged in their children's lives, to employ the tools available to them, and to restrict access to devices and internet access inappropriate for their children.

Secondly, imposing compliance with age verification software on all Internet sites that display images defined within the Bill is a fundamental invasion of privacy. While Section 2.2 states that identifying information may not be retained, that simply isn't practical and, if audited by the State, presents logistical challenges for said verifiers. The verification process would also create a "paper trail" through computer log data with which the State could potentially link verification queries with individuals and sites, building profiles on individuals, which is inappropriate and grotesque!

I write to you today to STRONGLY OPPOSE House Bill 2112 (2026) and urge you to vote against this measure in your assembly. While I appreciate the impetus behind the Bill, it will not accomplish its goals and will only serve to criminalize speech which is protected by the United States Constitution. Firstly, and foremost, it is the responsibility of parents to police the actions of their children, to prevent them from accessing objectionable content online, and protect them from harm. This is a PARENTING PROBLEM and nearly every internet enabled hardware device comes with built-in content controls ("Parental Controls") designed to accomplish this level of content filtering and control. The legislature should not be imposing regulation on private individualsβ€”the adults legally accessing the "objectionable content" defined in HB2112β€”to address a parenting problem. Encourage parents to be more involved and engaged in their children's lives, to employ the tools available to them, and to restrict access to devices and internet access inappropriate for their children. Secondly, imposing compliance with age verification software on all Internet sites that display images defined within the Bill is a fundamental invasion of privacy. While Section 2.2 states that identifying information may not be retained, that simply isn't practical and, if audited by the State, presents logistical challenges for said verifiers. The verification process would also create a "paper trail" through computer log data with which the State could potentially link verification queries with individuals and sites, building profiles on individuals, which is inappropriate and grotesque!

Thirdly, Section 1.7(c) of the Bill is ambiguous and subjective, without exception for amateur expression. Who is to say what works of art, by which artists, is of merit? Who will be the arbiter of "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value"? This is not a sufficient definition of acceptability. It's dangerous, McCarthy-esque language.Β 

Look, I'm sure you're getting a lot of these messages right now, and I appreciate that your staff is busy and possibly overwhelmed with work. This is a bad bill that will not accomplish its objectives of making the internet safer for children. The reality is that the internet is not a safe place for children to spend time unsupervised and without content restrictions. Parents need to use the tools available to themβ€”on their children's devices, laptops, home wifi routers, etc.β€”to make the content restrictions necessary to protect their children as they see fit. It is not the place of the Legislature to impose mass content restriction on everyone "for the children" when the solution is far simpler and already exists.

I sincerely urge you to vote against this bill.

Thank you for your service to your communities and the State of Washington.

Thirdly, Section 1.7(c) of the Bill is ambiguous and subjective, without exception for amateur expression. Who is to say what works of art, by which artists, is of merit? Who will be the arbiter of "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value"? This is not a sufficient definition of acceptability. It's dangerous, McCarthy-esque language.Β  Look, I'm sure you're getting a lot of these messages right now, and I appreciate that your staff is busy and possibly overwhelmed with work. This is a bad bill that will not accomplish its objectives of making the internet safer for children. The reality is that the internet is not a safe place for children to spend time unsupervised and without content restrictions. Parents need to use the tools available to themβ€”on their children's devices, laptops, home wifi routers, etc.β€”to make the content restrictions necessary to protect their children as they see fit. It is not the place of the Legislature to impose mass content restriction on everyone "for the children" when the solution is far simpler and already exists. I sincerely urge you to vote against this bill. Thank you for your service to your communities and the State of Washington.

Post image Post image

Do you live in Washington State?

I need you to do two things:

1) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?...) & read HB 2112.
2) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/pbc/bill/2112) & leave a comment urging your representatives to vote AGAINST the bill.

This is SERIOUS shit. Please!

My comment in the BLUE images.

22.01.2026 20:16 β€” πŸ‘ 262    πŸ” 334    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 9
Post image

❀️

also remember that ya wanna get a gunwitch plush there's just 6 days left!

22.01.2026 16:59 β€” πŸ‘ 396    πŸ” 55    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

hella good jiggling screw

22.01.2026 17:19 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

❀️

also remember that ya wanna get a gunwitch plush there's just 6 days left!

22.01.2026 16:59 β€” πŸ‘ 396    πŸ” 55    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Close up to the relevant area of a new character

21.01.2026 20:03 β€” πŸ‘ 687    πŸ” 89    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

GUNWITCH PLUSHIE UPDATE- First milestone reached!

Reminder that if you are interested on any of the other goodies, you can help towards them by ordering a plush.

ONL6 6 DAYS LEFT!!

www.ownaj.com/products/gun...

21.01.2026 15:37 β€” πŸ‘ 111    πŸ” 22    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

New bab has been drawn, I christen you "Shrimp Mage"

Tomorrow I'll go back to desperate plush shilling

19.01.2026 16:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1203    πŸ” 233    πŸ’¬ 26    πŸ“Œ 0

Pretty much. They also promote cheap rent for hot people and tourism for horny people in his vicinity

20.01.2026 20:46 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

WOOF

20.01.2026 18:43 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s part of the United Nations’ guidelines with the sole intent of paying institutions inside the country he currently resides in just so they make sure he stays there.

20.01.2026 03:04 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I try my best Banji, thank ye!

20.01.2026 01:29 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

New bab has been drawn, I christen you "Shrimp Mage"

Tomorrow I'll go back to desperate plush shilling

19.01.2026 16:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1203    πŸ” 233    πŸ’¬ 26    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Gunwitch Plush Dreamy Pride Official Merchandise Orders are estimated to ship by May.Β  Measures 25cm (10 inches) tall. Surface is washable on gentle cycle. Air dry and fluff briefly inΒ a dryer.

www.ownaj.com/products/gunwitch-plush

13.01.2026 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 45    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

GUNWITCH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

15.01.2026 15:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1188    πŸ” 160    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 1

Oh my god

19.01.2026 02:07 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ass in rioplatense spanish

19.01.2026 01:57 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 18.01.2026 23:37 β€” πŸ‘ 278    πŸ” 31    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 0

I guess the whole memory and thought mechanics can fill some space in that regard.

Then again, it’s not much different from β€œx group prospers after vanquishing local power, becomes empire, gets shafted by another emergent empire or x barbarians”

18.01.2026 20:24 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Just lube em up

18.01.2026 20:18 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thinking about doing a few animations according to plushie selling milestones.

Do you guys have anything in mind you’d like to see gunwitch doing or being done to her? Keep it nsfw, of course

18.01.2026 18:49 β€” πŸ‘ 46    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 0

9 days left for the campaign, if you’d like to get one of these check here

www.ownaj.com/products/gun...

18.01.2026 17:15 β€” πŸ‘ 89    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s like one of those heated japanese tables with a blankie

17.01.2026 22:45 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Unfortunately the VA didn't want to get credited so can't say πŸ˜”

17.01.2026 05:49 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It might be safer to just shoot at it honestly

16.01.2026 03:07 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

GUNWITCH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

15.01.2026 15:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1188    πŸ” 160    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 1

Yeah I lowkey wanted to add more complexity in that sense but since it's mass produced stuff it was a bit too much to ask

14.01.2026 22:19 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: GUNWITCH PLUSHIE

Bottom heavy cat creature now in marketable soft toy form with help by Ownaj.

-For it to actually happen it needs to sell 100 preorders, so I'd really appreciate it if you considered getting one.-

(this is photogrammetry not the other thing)

Info below

13.01.2026 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 190    πŸ” 39    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

@dreamypride is following 20 prominent accounts