Sad to hear of Leonard Lopate’s death. We always enjoyed his wit (and execrable puns) -- and always loved being on his show talking about language. We’ll miss him.
07.08.2025 15:40 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0@kandrpetras.bsky.social
word nuts | siblings | writers | NYT bestseller You’re Saying it Wrong | co-hosts with @FletcherPowell of award-winning KMUW/NPR syndicated radio show & podcast You’re Saying It Wrong
Sad to hear of Leonard Lopate’s death. We always enjoyed his wit (and execrable puns) -- and always loved being on his show talking about language. We’ll miss him.
07.08.2025 15:40 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Proof that we should consider putting Latin back in the curriculum.
www.thepoke.com/2025/05/15/a...
Phonetic spelling at its phinest, nez pah?
04.05.2025 11:53 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It's the 200th episode of You're Saying It Wrong ... and we (Kathy, Ross, and @fletcherpowell.bsky.social ) still have a lot to discuss. This week, it's a look at words that are just about 200 years old. Wow, talk about your coincidences!
www.kmuw.org/podcast/your...
@acesediting.bsky.social, challenge accepted: a haiku for National Grammar Day, dedicated to my favorite copy editing pet peeve.
"Use the comma splice
at your peril, however
periods are good."
#ACES #GrammarDay
This week, we answer more listener questions. What's with the r's popping up in non-r words like idear and warsh and such. And why is something as easy as pie? It's a fine how do you do! Yes, we talk about how do you do too -- with @fletcherpowell.bsky.social, of course! www.kmuw.org/podcast/your...
02.03.2025 18:03 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Got Nero on your mind? Or just wondering what certain oft-used Latin phrases mean (we're looking at you, sui generis!)? Have we got a YSIW episode for you! Et tu @fletcherpowell.bsky.social ? www.kmuw.org/podcast/your...
23.02.2025 21:27 — 👍 3 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 1You're older and wiser these days, right? BUT ... could you do decently on the SAT if you had to take it right now? This week, we're up to the Ds on those pesky SAT words we all know how to spell and define ... don't we? (Yes, we're looking at you, @fletcherpowell.bsky.social !) bit.ly/3QkcLFe
16.02.2025 19:52 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 1Romance is in the air! Move over, Wuthering Heights.
13.02.2025 18:11 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 1Yesterday's blog post on a slew of past tense forms and whether they're different in American and British English (perhaps not as much as some might think!)
separatedbyacommonlanguage.blogspot.com/2025/02/ed-v...
Baby, it’s cold outside! So let’s talk COLD!!! COLD things like shoulders and feet and thin ice and such … Yup, on this week’s You’re Saying It Wrong, we’re looking at winter-related idioms. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg …
@fletcherpowell.bsky.social www.kmuw.org/podcast/your...
Yeah, we dig, and we love! In the course of doing work on 50s slang, ran across this quote from Peter Lawford, member of the so-called Rat Pack along with Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Sammy Davis Jr., Joey Bishop, etc.
07.02.2025 17:19 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0“Like, we were getting off the boat the other day in Le Havre, and this French dame comes up to me and says, ‘Etes-vous un Rat?’' She's asking me, am I a Rat? I don't dig. Then I dig. She's asking me about the Rat Pack, you dig? But there's no word in French for Rat Pack, you dig?”
07.02.2025 17:19 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0In the course of looking for something completely different, we ran across this old but still vitally important newspaper correction. www.nytimes.com/2015/06/08/p...
06.02.2025 16:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Okay, sometimes AI isn't that bad. www.theguardian.com/science/2025...
05.02.2025 17:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Move over Who's On First!
youtu.be/0-FWOKzWpXU
As someone who studied Arabic, surprised that I, R, didn’t know that tariff -- a word too much in the news, comes from the ta'rif, the verbal noun from arafa, to know. I do know one thing, not wild about tariffs!
03.02.2025 18:05 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Let’s speak Canadian, eh? This week, in answer to a listener e-mail, we’re talking about that specific kind of English from the Great White North. Get your double double, take off your toque and give it a listen! With @fletcherpowell.bsky.social
www.kmuw.org/podcast/your...
Works for Fridays too!
31.01.2025 15:06 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0You can't make these things up ... www.404media.co/trump-admin-...
30.01.2025 16:33 — 👍 3 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0So is it rescission or recision? Or even recission — which appears in a definition on the Legal Information Institute at Cornell (right before they also spell it rescission). Arrgh. @merriam-webster.com @dictionarycom — can you help us out here? What’s the most common spelling today?
30.01.2025 16:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Then there’s an alternate spelling, recision, with a broader peak—from 1977 to 1983 —followed by a similar, even more pronounced, collapse.
30.01.2025 16:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Well, we found that there was an act in 1933 that allowed stock purchasers the right to rescind transactions due to fraud, and, in 1977, the US proposed rescinding funds for international security assistance. But other dates also had major instances of rescissions.
30.01.2025 16:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Got curious about the White House press secretary’s use of the word rescission yesterday. It’s odd. There were two high and brief peaks of the word on Google Ngram (an admittedly unscientific source) in 1933 and 1977. Both peaks were four to five times higher than usage currently. Wonder why?
30.01.2025 16:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Let’s talk — or should we say converse? Yes, a Norman and an Old English word for the same idea … which is this week’s topic: how Norman words poured into the English language and won the "sounds classier" sweepstakes. @fletcherpowell.bsky.social www.kmuw.org/podcast/your...
28.01.2025 16:50 — 👍 0 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 1Pretty ambiguous, eh?
28.01.2025 16:35 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Our entire show has been seven years of me unlearning language rules that aren’t really rules. If I can do it, anyone can!
22.01.2025 18:51 — 👍 3 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0UK Children's #WotY2024 is KINDNESS
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
A couple of these are a little debatable to us (one in particular) but things have changed in 112 years!
23.01.2025 16:30 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Sure enough, there are still some Latinists out there. A few hours later:
“CORRECTION: The headline was amended to change the Latin plural “exeunt” to the singular “exit” as it is one individual, not many who is exiting the stage. “