Marc Sabatier Hvidkjær's Avatar

Marc Sabatier Hvidkjær

@marchvidkjaer.bsky.social

PhD student, Harvard Comparative Politics, Political Behavior, Political Economy https://marchvidkjaer.com/

1,294 Followers  |  602 Following  |  770 Posts  |  Joined: 25.09.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Marc Sabatier Hvidkjær (@marchvidkjaer.bsky.social)

Congratulations!

02.03.2026 15:24 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

1️⃣
Denmark is about to buy new frigates worth billions 💰⚓️ - replacements for these 👇

Naturally, Europe’s major naval shipyards are now on charm offensives in Copenhagen.

🇬🇧 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇩🇪
Basically the Champions League semifinals - but with missiles 🚀

27.02.2026 20:47 — 👍 40    🔁 11    💬 2    📌 0

Ah, I see. I mean they have to call it before October 1st. The multi-party gov was tripping over each other to prepare for the election.
This was the PMs last chance to "surprise" the rest and have the advantage of initiative. Polls are also as good as they will get (partially due to Greenland).

27.02.2026 03:22 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

There is no need for a greater mandate for the gov on Greenland, where there is complete consensus. Don't know why the BBC frames it this way.

27.02.2026 02:54 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

Russia, Venezuela, Iran, China, the Sahel region, the United States ...

Want to know why state agents carry out brutal repression — or participate in illegal coups?

Our new book "Making a Career in Dictatorship" provides answers — it just got published by @academic.oup.com:

tinyurl.com/ystwm3tf

16.02.2026 11:09 — 👍 132    🔁 73    💬 12    📌 9

I just got tear gassed along with thousands of union members, many of whom had their families with them. Federal agents at the ICE facility tear gassed children. We must abolish ICE, DHS, and we must have prosecutions. I expect to see enforcement of our city code prohibiting the use of tear gas.

01.02.2026 01:23 — 👍 16836    🔁 5011    💬 229    📌 205
Post image

My colleague Kevin Munger asked me and a bunch of editors to sit and think through AI and peer review. Our take:

osf.io/9sxnc/files/...

We envision an increased (!) involvement of humans in the evaluation of social science.

28.01.2026 21:59 — 👍 84    🔁 32    💬 4    📌 4

Ha I was not aware of this export of ours! Fantastic.

24.01.2026 14:08 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 1

Looking forward to seeing all those stacked 321 publications with a lot of pictures.

16.01.2026 14:18 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

!!

16.01.2026 14:17 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

This looks great, congratulations!

09.01.2026 10:34 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I mean, many peoples can't survive to see that episode. Didn't make it through the rest of the season after that.

23.12.2025 07:58 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Fascinerende paper! Ryger lige ned i min econ-research-mental-health mappe, hvor der kommer mange interessante studier ud i disse år.

21.12.2025 09:52 — 👍 5    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Looks great Joris! Congratulations on getting it out.

18.12.2025 13:05 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image Post image

🇪🇺🇩🇪 Published Today in @bjpols.bsky.social 🇮🇹🇫🇷

How a voting advice application affected voting behavior in three large-scale field experiments:

shorturl.at/2ekBj

TLDR of our study (with @simonhix.bsky.social & @rlachat.bsky.social) below 👇 1/14

18.12.2025 11:40 — 👍 84    🔁 32    💬 5    📌 0
Post image

Excited to have just finished this pre-analysis plan with @larahankeln.bsky.social, @johannesbrehm.bsky.social, and Henri. It will be interesting to see which, if any, of our predictions will be borne out by the data. More on that in the new year. In the meanwhile, let me tell you about our theory.

16.12.2025 15:10 — 👍 26    🔁 6    💬 1    📌 1

Hvorfor er stigende ulighed et problem? Høj ulighed hænger sammen med lav socialmobilitet.

Socialmobilitet er vigtigt:

Forskning viser: Hvis læger med en lav socioøkonomisk baggrund behandler patienter med lav socioøkonomisk baggrund, lever patienterne længere og bedre.
@idalykkekr.bsky.social

15.12.2025 08:40 — 👍 53    🔁 15    💬 2    📌 1

Super cool artikel, tillykke med udgivelsen @idalykkekr.bsky.social

15.12.2025 15:18 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

🚨NEW WORKING PAPER🚨 Why are many Latino immigrants *not* naturalizing, learning English, and participating in American politics? We provide new theory and evidence across 3 surveys and an instrumental variables approach to show how migration motives shape immigrant integration. tinyurl.com/3expvu8e

12.12.2025 21:11 — 👍 48    🔁 19    💬 1    📌 2

Asaro is a new cafe by the gov department; very good, recommended! And 30 minutes in the free art museum + coffee there is also good if not done before.

10.12.2025 03:31 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Stort tillykke! Enormt interessant projekt.

09.12.2025 23:13 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Cool, remember this being presented at DHPE last year! Congratulations on having it out.

08.12.2025 13:19 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
How Settlers Shaped Eastern Europe and Scandinavia Cambridge Core - Political Economy - How Settlers Shaped Eastern Europe and Scandinavia

Very happy that my forthcoming @universitypress.cambridge.org Elements - "How Settlers Shaped Eastern Europe and Scandinavia: Economic Development, Regime Change, and State Formation, 800–1800." Can now be pre-ordered at www.cambridge.org/core/element...

08.12.2025 12:07 — 👍 24    🔁 8    💬 3    📌 0

A blog post giving a more thorough take on survey experiments and the credibility revolution: cyrussamii.com?p=4168

03.12.2025 17:23 — 👍 79    🔁 36    💬 6    📌 6

🤨

01.12.2025 20:08 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

My thought was the extent to which this could have been solved over email. But I don't think that would have done it, and that it is beneficial to have this comment public for cumulative learning.

30.11.2025 19:20 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Fantastic article! Enjoyed reading it in @feyaadallie.bsky.social seminar on comparative political behavior recently.

30.11.2025 15:35 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

I am agnostic to what the right proces should've been here.

My main doubt: why not simply email the authors about the weights, before performing the replication? If the aim is knowledge accumulation, this seems to be the shortest path.

30.11.2025 14:40 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Absolutely- It was just to say that it is unclear whether the authors will get the final word, or whether we are fallting into a reply-reply-reply-… doom loop

29.11.2025 23:48 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

The reply has not been published.

29.11.2025 21:32 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0