"No shirt, no shoes, no miserable old fucks, no service."
02.08.2025 22:44 β π 22 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0@jpj.bsky.social
Historian of scientific racism. Here's how to find all my stuff: https://www.johnpjacksonjr.com/
"No shirt, no shoes, no miserable old fucks, no service."
02.08.2025 22:44 β π 22 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0I'm sure he still has his quote boy.
02.08.2025 22:37 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Trump simultaneously insists that his name isnβt in the Epstein files, but if his name is in the files, bad actors mustβve somehow βdoctoredβ them, then failed to release the damaging info during the actual campaign when it wouldβve made sense for them to do so. That wacky Democratic βscumβ just left the βdoctoredβ files as a weird βgag giftβ for his administration to find. Does your head hurt yet?
When you are in the GOP, nothing has to make sense. www.publicnotice.co/p/trump-epst...
02.08.2025 21:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0As a white male who did not get hired for nearly 100 TT jobs I applied for (including one at Cornell) with the obvious lie that "We had hundreds of applicants..." I obviously deserve 100s of more dollars than Dr. "Creationist" Wright.
31.07.2025 20:50 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0An adaptation that is new to me! My favorite part is when Alice says, "Oh wow! Oh wow!" which is the most 1971 thing ever. www.openculture.com/2025/07/curi...
31.07.2025 18:13 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0A strong argument against "biological race realism." Open access! link.springer.com/article/10.1...
31.07.2025 11:55 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0How Critics of Racial Hereditarian Research (Mis)Categorize Empirical Studies: Commentary on Bird et al. (2024) Federico R. Leo Μn Graduate School, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola According to Bird et al. (2024), racial hereditarian research (RHR) is scientific racism that should be curbed by the American Psychological Association. They presented an RHR bibliography in which I found eight works of Federico R. Leo Μn addressing cognitive performance. The eight studies were animated by a socioecological rather than RHR perspective and two of them explicitly contradicted the racial/hereditarian position. I conclude that Bird et al.βs design of the RHR bibliographic classification was erroneous and counterproductive to their own aims and should be modified. I also suggest alternative ways to strengthen anti-RHR positions.
The Moralistic Fallacy in a Selective Critique of Admixture Regression: Commentary on Bird et al. (2024) Gregory Connor1 and John G. R. Fuerst2 1 Dublin, Ireland 2 Department of Biotechnology, University of Maryland Bird et al. (2024) propose an effective ban on admixture regression research that uses cognitive test scores as the dependent variable. Their core argument is moral and political, but they also offer a scientific critique of the methodology. Many highly regarded admixture regression studies examining a wide range of medical and psychological traits fall within their scientific critique, despite a lack of moral or political salience. Rejecting the scientific legitimacy of admixture regression analysis if the dependent variable is politically sensitive but accepting it if the dependent variable is politically painless may entail the moralistic fallacy.
Applying Rigorous Standards Is Not a Ban or Censorship: A Reply to Leo Μn (2025) and Connor and Fuerst (2025) Kevin A. Bird1, John P. Jackson Jr.2, and Andrew S. Winston3 1 Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis 2 James Madison College, Michigan State University 3 Department of Psychology, University of Guelph In their commentaries on Bird et al. (2024), Leo Μn (2025) and Connor and Fuerst (2025) misrepresent our position as supporting censorship or bans on racial hereditarian research. We explicitly rejected censorship and bans, and we warned against labeling researchers as βracists.β Instead, we argued for the application of stringent scientific standards from relevant disciplines. Connor and Fuerstβs argument for using admixture regression to find a genetic basis for racial differences in test scores is rejected. Their focus on this specific method fails to address the scientific and ethical issues of racial hereditarian research that we raised in Bird et al. (2024).
Two critical comments on our American Psychologist paper "Confronting scientific racism in psychology: Lessons from evolutionary biology and genetics." (doi.org/10.1037/amp0...) were published recently along with our reply. 1/
29.07.2025 19:25 β π 61 π 29 π¬ 3 π 0All the songs you need. www.openculture.com/2025/07/tom-...
29.07.2025 17:47 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel.β pranx.com/static-tv-no...
29.07.2025 15:48 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0A petition announced Monday would help push back against censorship in Michigan libraries and calls for increased legislative support to statewide catalogs.
Story by @bensolis1.bsky.social
michiganadvance.com/briefs/state...
Eats baby crocodiles too.
28.07.2025 18:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 03.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706798214808651328230664709384460955058223172535940812848111745028410270193852110555964462294895493038196 4428810975665933446128475648233786783165271201909145648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141
26.07.2025 15:01 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This is the monster Trump is threatening to pardon. digbysblog.net/2025/07/25/t...
26.07.2025 13:28 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Cover of World Finest comic book from 1971 featuring Superman and Wonder Woman. The dialog reads, "How can the killing of a student in 1971 lead to the death of everyone on Earth 200 years later!?"
MAGA is concerned about woke Superman. Or, as they said in 1971, "Should have been done long ago..."
25.07.2025 14:43 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1Good news. SF-Based Internet Archive Is Now a Federal Depository Library. What Does That Mean? | KQED share.google/J9w8jXMsV5Jl...
25.07.2025 00:07 β π 4 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0Anybody who has 20 minutes would probably enjoy this evisceration of Trump's bullshit lawsuit against the WSJ. youtu.be/Fg7yTKX5xxo?...
24.07.2025 23:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I do not need AI to make myself stupid. I can do that by myself. theconversation.com/is-chatgpt-m...
24.07.2025 15:39 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0***Attention Historians***
Tenure-track job postings in History and History-adjacent fields for July 2025.
A thread.
1/
With a built in shock collar in case we say something bad about free enterprise!
23.07.2025 14:44 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0A photo of the Burj Khalifa tower in Dubai.
Why does the cover have a sketch of the Burj Khalifa tower?
22.07.2025 19:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Hoarder class.
22.07.2025 17:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I use my grandma's 12" Griswold cast-iron skillet. I don't know how old the pan is but since she died in 1965, it is at least that old.
22.07.2025 17:00 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0A delightful way to read some fanfic whilst sticking it to the richest transphobe on the planet. www.humblebundle.com/books/unoffi...
21.07.2025 17:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@haymarketbooks.org is hosting some important workshops to fight the authoritarians. caseygrants.hubspotpagebuilder.com/summer-schoo...
21.07.2025 17:23 β π 7 π 6 π¬ 0 π 0How do you deal with a reactionary, far-right U.S. Supreme Court majority in this moment of the Trump administrationβs repeated lawlessness if you are a federal district judge who believes in the rule of law? You take the Supreme Courtβs rulings at face value β no more and no less than what the justices themselves are actually willing to say β and move forward, carefully. Federal district judges, by and large, have shown they are up to the task of this moment β regardless of the president who appointed them. (Itβs as we go up the line β to appeals courts and then the Supreme Court β that the rulings start to look more and more politicized.)
Turns out that a version of work-to-rule can be useful for lower courts to try to do the right thing. www.lawdork.com/p/illston-ma...
19.07.2025 17:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 051,000 preventable deaths from the Big "Beautiful" Bill. ldi.upenn.edu/our-work/res...
19.07.2025 15:31 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I like weird music as much as the next weirdo. I'll admit, however I've never listened to this notorious gem until now. Do I want to be cooler-than-thou and claim it is brilliant? Or, do I...um..not want to do that? Decisions, decisions.... www.openculture.com/2025/07/revi...
18.07.2025 15:12 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0AI put to good use at last. youtu.be/ELJhKli-dmk?...
18.07.2025 01:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Our former VP of Research here at Michigan State is one of the "geniuses" behind this idea. To say he lacks judgment is the most charitable thing you can say about him. altrightorigins.com/2020/06/11/t...
17.07.2025 16:05 β π 6 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Cleveland
City of Lights
City of Magic
youtu.be/XVNuT4fkjAs?...