Ashley Claymore

Totally, but even the books are still more likely to only be in the initial training. And not play a significant part when it's tuned. The base model and books teach it how things work, but the tuning is what gives it tone.

It only trains on the internet for the base model. It's then trained on custom examples, that humans have been paid to write to tune it towards behaving in a particular way.
Models only trained on the raw internet are too prone to being rude and other undesirable outputs.

What a LLM learns during fine tuning is much stronger than what's in the user prompt.
The reason it's ignoring the request to use fewer emojis is likely that the training data is just too biased to using emoji, and not enough examples of following the request not to use them.

I've found chatting with LLMs very useful. But have had to turn off inline suggestions. Too much time spent reading the suggestion, only to reject it because it's not what I'm trying to do.
If I've only typed two characters, that is not enough to read my mind.

I've really enjoyed the Computerphile vids so far!
Maybe a compiler series? 😃

How to make thenables Safer? How to make thenables Safer? Matthew Gaudet, Mozilla

docs.google.com/presentation...

This is only one of the ideas. And possibly the least likely to be web compatible (is my guess)

Exactly, the proposal is to also make the Reflect.get("then") also async.
( is my understanding)

@rich-harris.dev btw this behaviour, is being discussed at TC39 plenary next week.
The proposal is that user-land "then" properties will no longer be executed synchronously (as I understand it)

I think that's the compressed size

next test: "I'm coming with snacks I found"

I had a date with a dinosaur!

My grandparents would always answer the phone by saying their own number. Many years after human operators had been removed from the switches.

"#summary

perfection is the energy of done 😉 "

One snag with remove on save: temporarily commenting out code to check something and then un-commenting later.

Might have gotten better but this put me off.

I am hoping we can write some custom rules without compiling to native or sacrificing too much perf. Maybe these will have to be expressed declaratively like ast-grep.

Oh dear, double parked by looks of it 😛
Have a good one!

Expandable hovers 😍
Know these have been in the works for a while and I'm so excited to try them out.

devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/a...

The phase "<verb> like you've never <past(verb)> before" hits me the wrong way.

> "now the bar() function is being called directly, with no object property access"

To be fair this also happens if the caller imports the function by name.
I wouldn't want to see any function declaration assume its `this` is a module namespace.

I keep going back and forth on if a good film would be easier or harder than a good book.

When a book is adapted for screen lots is cut out.
But a book can just describe something, a video needs to look believable.

Capturing for posterity:
I asked ChatGPT "When do you think there will be a best selling novel written entirely by AI?"

A: "You might see a fully AI-authored book in the Amazon Top 100 by the late 2020s, and a New York Times best-seller by early 2030s."

the trickery of array imposters

Also

(function(a, b = 1){}).length

Which is why auto currying utilities and default args should be combined with caution

I have some vague memory of Chrome adding a way to "not stop on this line" to their devtools.
Maybe wishful thinking

YouTube video by Undecided with Matt Ferrell Why Thorium is About to Change the World

And there's been some more thorium progress youtu.be/bz4aTO6M4Ho

I would enjoy pub quizzes a lot more if there was a JS round!

It depends on strict mode

it is when I'm trying to write some c++ for the first time in ~7 years.
I need my bot buddy to hold my hand while I find the strength to read these templating errors
🫠

First trip to NY!
80/20% nervous/excited.

Watch films or try and code without a copilot on the flight?

Thank you! 🤩