Perhaps we should all ask for compensation, but to whom? The Government, of course. Who else? The stupidity of our fellow human beings? Sure!
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
@emp1.bsky.social
Hic sunt dracones I represent myself, no one else. Computational and associative learning. Biologically-inspired AI. She/They https://cit-ai.net/people.html#Mondragon https://www.city.ac.uk/about/people/academics/esther-mondragon
Perhaps we should all ask for compensation, but to whom? The Government, of course. Who else? The stupidity of our fellow human beings? Sure!
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
> He said he was sick that day and rushing to finish [so] used a Chat-GPT paraphrased version of Shambaugh’s blog rather than a direct quote.
As much as tech fash insist AI is a solution for illness: it's the opposite. Moving the deadline, resting, etc, is free.
www.404media.co/ars-technica...
I’m not concerned by a ‘lack of decorum’ since that is often used to tell people to be quiet when they raise important issues.
I am concerned about the lack of shame and basic decency.
I am deeply concerned about the lack of consequences to wealthy elites.
Indeed! Now just imagine what comes next when training ceases in favour of machine"intellectual" guidance.
15.02.2026 20:19 — 👍 7 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0arxiv.org/abs/2602.07519
14.02.2026 10:30 — 👍 4 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Yep!
15.02.2026 15:57 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Behaviourism, regarded as an aversive US, is now paired with other still more neutral terms in an attempt to transfer its negative value to those labels. I wonder whether Pavlov would have approved; Watson would most certainly have done so. 🤔
You cannot expect me not to point this out, right?
This piece is about CS conferences, but it speaks to a larger trend. What are we, as individual researchers and scholarly communities, doing to prevent epistemic poison? What can we do to preserve and maintain the quality of our knowledge in this era of bullshit and slop?
⚗️ 🧪 #SciComm #Ethics
Enough is enough, Mr Taranis! ☔
www.metoffice.gov.uk/blog/2026/me...
Top part of page 1 of: Henle, M. (1978). One man against the Nazis: Wolfgang Köhler. American Psychologist, 33(10), 939.
I found one of the chapters of Mary Henle’s book online, previously published as article, this one:
Henle, M. (1978). One man against the Nazis: Wolfgang Köhler. American Psychologist, 33(10), 939.
Let me see if I can find some of the other chapters too.
pure.mpg.de/rest/items/i...
6/🧵
even tho these examples are so tired, the reliance on these systems grows... it's so messed up
14.02.2026 13:19 — 👍 30 🔁 7 💬 0 📌 1Absolutely wild!
14.02.2026 16:07 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I very much miss watching the waves here (not sure about this time though) Luckily, there is always a friend who sends a video. 🌊
14.02.2026 15:50 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Yes!
14.02.2026 14:40 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Bc it means certain people cannot play only by their own rules to determine who's in their club, plays their game, or who isn't. Feminization means democratization. It means access & sharing with others. It is skill-based participation, not hand-shake agreement. And some people cannot have that.
14.02.2026 14:38 — 👍 5 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0Jeez! 🙄
14.02.2026 14:34 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It's also not unrelated to this logic and behaviour bsky.app/profile/sexa...
14.02.2026 14:17 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0🙃 Their absolute disregard for democratic principles always shows up ✂️🪄
14.02.2026 13:15 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Putting aside all other nonsense spat out by these terrified fools, what is the problem with the "feminisation of higher education"? Women make up over 50% of the UK population and nearly 50% of the world's population. Why should male views be more preferred over those of women? ✂️🪄
14.02.2026 10:52 — 👍 49 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 1arxiv.org/abs/2602.07519
14.02.2026 10:30 — 👍 4 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Whether you agree with all of the below or not, Berna is imo the person doing the most interesting thinking in the metascience space. It’s provocative (cuts against the accepted wisdom) but very important.
I do really strongly agree with her about the crisis/disaster narrative.
On the publication bias discourse, I regret that metascience has become a source of decontextualized, low-res, bean-counting-focused `science is in crisis' narratives. It is largely uncurious abt science, desperately lacking in theory & measurement. I'll quote a few takes I liked & add my thoughts🧵
13.02.2026 00:41 — 👍 118 🔁 29 💬 3 📌 12Applications and code
github.com/cal-r/PALMS-...
New preprint and simulator of associative learning attentional models. Have fun! 👁️
arxiv.org/abs/2602.07519
cal-r.org/index.php?id...
#simulation #associative_learning #attention
Always great to read the bible 🙂
12.02.2026 14:24 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Modern times: Got a bit of good news, and now I am worrying when and where the slap will come from.
11.02.2026 19:31 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0We are demanding that EU co-legislators reject attempts in the AI Omnibus to remove a key transparency safeguard from the AI Act.
We cannot open a loophole that would let providers exempt themselves from the AI Act’s high risk requirements with no transparency www.accessnow.org/press-releas...
The relevant video about how LLMs impact human learning is below in case anyone is curious and hasn't seen it already (it's part of a 7-part series which is my pinned tweet and also findable from YouTube if you go to my playlists)
10.02.2026 21:18 — 👍 9 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 1