The Questionable Authority's Avatar

The Questionable Authority

@questauthority.bsky.social

Father, Army Husband (Ret.), lawyer. KUSK alum; public servant. Litigation disaster tour guide. Odd Fellow (and odd fellow). Proud member of the terminally online community since 1993. he/him

30,933 Followers  |  3,252 Following  |  16,660 Posts  |  Joined: 05.05.2023  |  2.4341

Latest posts by questauthority.bsky.social on Bluesky

I got a whole-ass PhD out of my "embrace of adolescence."

From QMUL.

11.08.2025 18:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Public defenders are the absolute champions of the legal profession.

11.08.2025 18:40 β€” πŸ‘ 58    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Oh, please link me. I've got court twice today, I need some stress relief.

11.08.2025 18:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

It's a different one. Also I missed the comics and legos one.

11.08.2025 18:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

We need a word for "being a pathetic little pedantic schmuck who sucks joy from existence."

A bet the Germans have one.

Maybe we can mug them and carry it off into our dictionary.

11.08.2025 18:08 β€” πŸ‘ 42    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 0

Counterpoint:
It turns out that our current oligarch-dominated media system was very well designed to deal with a far right authoritarian party.

Just not in the direction we had hoped it was.

11.08.2025 18:05 β€” πŸ‘ 66    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

On the one hand, it wouldn't be social media if an assortment of asshats didn't 'but ackshually' every bit of humor and snark in the world. If that didn't happen, I'd worry that I was doing things wrong.

But on the other hand, AAAAAAAGGGGGGGHHHHHHHGHGHGGHGIJGHGH8GHHGHHHHHG HGGHHH***THUD*THUD*THUD*

11.08.2025 17:48 β€” πŸ‘ 41    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Because, Alvaro. Because.

11.08.2025 17:52 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This person claims to be a lawyer practicing constitutional law and defamation. I'm having some difficulty believing this, although, to be fair, they did caveat their claim by saying they graduated from Harvard Law.

11.08.2025 15:52 β€” πŸ‘ 39    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1

I'll alert the newspapers.

11.08.2025 17:49 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

On the one hand, it wouldn't be social media if an assortment of asshats didn't 'but ackshually' every bit of humor and snark in the world. If that didn't happen, I'd worry that I was doing things wrong.

But on the other hand, AAAAAAAGGGGGGGHHHHHHHGHGHGGHGIJGHGH8GHHGHHHHHG HGGHHH***THUD*THUD*THUD*

11.08.2025 17:48 β€” πŸ‘ 41    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I just didn't think it would be this pathetically dumb.

11.08.2025 17:41 β€” πŸ‘ 91    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 12    πŸ“Œ 0

You sound mad. Don't get mad, Owl. Absolute winners of the internet don't get mad.

11.08.2025 17:30 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

(I know)

11.08.2025 17:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Well, at least you managed to state a fact in the final sentence.

11.08.2025 16:37 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah, no way does some random dude with "trials of Osiris" (whatever that is) in their screen name possibly know anything about the case. No chance. Zero. Really.

11.08.2025 16:11 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If I only ever watch Fox News on my TV, do those TOS bind me?

11.08.2025 15:59 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I have concerns. But I don't want to misuse the word "serious."

11.08.2025 15:58 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Also doesn't seem familiar with the idea that the date of a change to TOS doesn't indicate that everything in the TOS is new as of the change date.

11.08.2025 15:57 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This person claims to be a lawyer practicing constitutional law and defamation. I'm having some difficulty believing this, although, to be fair, they did caveat their claim by saying they graduated from Harvard Law.

11.08.2025 15:52 β€” πŸ‘ 39    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1

Dafuq?

11.08.2025 15:45 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Two things can be true:

1) The President has legal authority over the D.C. police and the D.C. National Guard that he doesn't have *anywhere else* in the country; &

2) Even if this doesn't set a legal precedent, it sets an ominous *political* precedent for pretextually overriding local government.

11.08.2025 15:32 β€” πŸ‘ 7608    πŸ” 1959    πŸ’¬ 312    πŸ“Œ 85

E.W. has already acknowledged that this is fake further downtrend. I'm reskeeting in the likely vain hope that people will check my tl before tagging.

11.08.2025 04:42 β€” πŸ‘ 95    πŸ” 23    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 3

It's not real.

11.08.2025 04:40 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Fake.

The singer's title is wrong. Dinna has been VP Legal for months.

11.08.2025 04:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think it's fake.

11.08.2025 04:34 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Lighten up, Francis.

11.08.2025 04:33 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

For those wondering:
Less well-known than bird law, but a remarkable number of similarities.

11.08.2025 01:58 β€” πŸ‘ 42    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 0

/10. So, let’s turn this into more of a positive. How can you consult with a lawyer in a way that makes the lawyer want to take you as a client?

There are some pretty simple things you can do.

10.08.2025 16:52 β€” πŸ‘ 717    πŸ” 54    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 4

/5 (4) Client, despite looking for lawyer to advise them, has very strong ideas of what the law is and reacts with disbelief or hostility to being told that’s not right
(5) Client gets angry at you when told what the law is if they don’t like it

10.08.2025 16:42 β€” πŸ‘ 1161    πŸ” 27    πŸ’¬ 19    πŸ“Œ 10

@questauthority is following 19 prominent accounts