this i completely agree with and is a much improved critique of the article! transmisogyny is what they should have been villifying, not misandry.

i'm not opposed to criticizing allies, but offer improvements instead of just hating their mistakes. so many in this thread conveniently including that.

your insistence that it matters is looking like bigotry and continually adding more and more to what i said without me saying it is just lying. you're lying to yourself because anger feels good. next time try responding to what someone says instead of what you assume about people like them.

read it again

when did i try to define you? why would i want to?

well that's about the worst faith interpretation i've ever seen in any discussion. i'm absolutely in favor of trans people fighting against their genocide and if you tried at all to understand my meaning that would be obvious but why would you do that when it feels so good to be angry?

i agree.

where did i say that. i thought you weren't making shit up.

you haven't pointed to transphobia. you have just said the word. and then gone on to actually engage in transphobic behavior and rhetoric.

so you're a bigot. got it.

who is making shit up

point to the lie

why the fuck do you think that's any of your business at all?! if you treat me differently based on whether or not i'm trans, you're a fucking bigot. if you're not, then the answer doesn't matter. why the fuck would you ask a stranger that?

you said nothing against anyone except the attempted ally in your post. i responsed to your post. i made up nothing.

you're so willing to attack them without offering the improved argument. villifying those trying to defend you, more than those who are actually attacking you is harmful. your choices are harmful.

you are wrong. i'm glad they argued with you. your knee jerk is flawed and you're digging your heels in. so many allies hesitate to defend trans people for exactly this reason.

WTF IS HAPPENING

that was an internal critique, clearly separated from the perspective of the author... trans women definitionally are presumed male at birth and the anti trans tr**p administration *is* using that fact to insinuate a "permanent existential threat to women"... not aligning themselves with that view.

got a link? i can't find it.

even in his dumb chart, the left is shrinking and the right is stretching farther and farther... he just right aligned it to give an illusion. but the chart isn't based on any measurable, just like most right political views...

maybe you shouldn't be engaging in philosophical conversations if you can't understand basic philosophy.

you can't understand it, you're too afraid and too dishonest. stay in denial.

i never claimed to be smart. i've never known anything in my whole life. but your lack of understanding here this impressing many.

i reject that premise, hence my very obvious answer. but you are too afraid to address any of that because you are a dishonest coward who still hasn't even attempted to answer my question with or without constant premises. questions aren't claims, stupid. if you want to do socrates, learn it first.

this person who is pretending that questions are claims and expecting strangers to write his premises into a syllogism for him calling others obtuse has me on the floor

what claim did i change? i changed nothing. i answered your question. you just don't like the answer. that's why you refused to answer mine. what a coward and a phony.

list of banned keywords

🚨BREAKING. From a program officer at the National Science Foundation, a list of keywords that can cause a grant to be pulled. I will be sharing screenshots of these keywords along with a decision tree. Please share widely. This is a crisis for academic freedom & science.

Today’s dose of what the fuckery, bought to you by the US National Science Federation a government body who fund research grant applications. But now, if the application includes the words female and woman, it won’t.

Trans people have repeatedly warned transphobia was a gateway drug. Here we are.

i mean you answered your own question: not all humans are bipedal.

98% of all matter is either hydrogen or helium. does that mean matter is binary? everything is either hydrogen or helium? the rest is ignored as outliers when we define matter?

seems silly to me.

i thought everyone left facebook... maybe this was before that

which him? him who? there are too many to hate right now...