Indeed - and too much emphasis on 'proving' things using methods they know cannot keep up, when it would be far more honest/simple to state it's obviously all bl**dy climate change now.

It might help if climate coverage 'leaders' like the Guardian - not to mention most leading scientists and especially the IPCC (present company excepted), told the truth about how bad they know things really are. open.substack.com/pub/jacksond...

Wildfire burns through northern suburb of Athens as residents told to evacuate People in Kryoneri, north-east of the Greek capital, receive SMS messages telling them to get to safe areas

Only a matter of time before a wildfire wipes a major city from the face of the planet

Will people sit up and take notice then?

Will governments and fossil fuel corporations act to slash emissions?

Will they hell

www.theguardian.com/world/2025/j...

Scientists and especially the IPCC massively underestimate speed of climate change and related risks - shock. Because their methods very obviously can't keep up. Will these people ever learn? open.substack.com/pub/jacksond...

Because global net-zero - an impossible target (without radical, massive reductions in activity no-one is planning) supposed to prevent us breaching a temp limit by 2100 we've already smashed through - is so meaningful. Farcical.

Petition: Fund a National Climate Resilience Plan: protect communities from climate impact From floods to extreme temperatures, climate impacts risk damaging homes, health, businesses, services, and the economy. We want Government to prioritise adaptation; fund a new Resilience Plan that…

NEW PETITION: We want the Government to prioritise adaptation; fund a new Resilience Plan that works with nature and includes public education, infrastructure standards and local funding. Help us by signing this @climatemajority.bsky.social petition.

petition.parliament.uk/petitions/73...

More proof - as if it were needed - of how far off the models are, especially those relied on by the IPCC. Not sure, however, about the 'optimistic' (complacent?) suggestion acceleration may be short-lived...

Thanks but I thought we were not in a La Niña? Climate Prediction Center: ENSO Diagnostic Discussion share.google/Z6sESLaseI5q...

Wow - this guy is deluded af. First dismisses Suzuki as 'a scientist'. Then lists a bunch of BS non-solutions we're not even doing any more. But then claims we are winning and losing simultaneously. In denial like so many in the green 'industry'.

Have you seen any suggested explanations for the June downturn please - even if this remains high compared to most previous years?

Regional acceleration of warming is much more apparent even:

Acceleration of global warming is more apparent when looking at the oceans:

This is hilarious. A rise of 4.3'C by 2070 'could' result in no further need for actuaries - or anything else, you numpties.

Adapting Strategically to Climate Breakdown: How We Can All Work to Make a Difference and Keep Each Other #Safer Rupert Read and Caroline Lucas on the Climate Majority Project's new campaign to make climate impacts a national priority, giving voice to the hidden majority who are waking up to climate reality

Some signs of intelligent life in the UK. Perhaps too little too late, but at least trying to put something in place in advance of the sh*t really hitting the... www.bylinesupplement.com/p/adapting-s...

Another deeply concerning feedback loop reducing the CO2-absorption capacity of natural sinks - don't expect IPCC models or net-zero plans to reflect this any time soon. Also ignore pathetic fake-hopeful message about breeding 'resistant strains' saving all the forests - idiots.

Yes it is. Still the Guardian can't stop itself finishing the article with an absurd 'hopeful' message about breeding resistant new strains or whatever, not remotely applicable on a planetary scale, if at all. Idiots.

Unbelievably complacent. Unbelievably misleading. The vast majority of global energy use is from fossil fuels. 'Renewables' are additional not alternative to these. Only drastic cuts in consumption/destruction could do anything now. But the green 'industry' can't tell you that.

Madder Than Expected – how climate scientists and the IPCC still won’t tell the truth about accelerating climate change.

That will make all the difference of course. Scientists - especially climate scientists and the IPCC - urgently need to find effective ways of communicating how bad, they know, things really are. open.substack.com/pub/jacksond...

Thanks but with genuine respect - who do the authors think will pay the slightest attention to this warning in this form? All the evidence shows the answer is no-one. Way more radical action/comms are urgently needed (as per suggestions in article posted) but starting with calling out the IPCC.

Madder Than Expected – how climate scientists and the IPCC still won’t tell the truth about accelerating climate change.

If only there was a conference where climate scientists asked themselves why everything gets worse so much faster than they predict - or the IPCC will tell anyone - with dire consequences for meaningful action jacksondamian.substack.com/p/madder-tha...

‘Catastrophic’ flood in Texas kills at least 24, including children, with more missing from summer camp Up to 10in of rain fell overnight, prompting flash flooding in region west of Austin hit by long drought

Just don't mention #climate breakdown

www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

Is climate change accelerating? Incredible some of these hesitant clowns still pretend there is the slightest doubt or debate about this. Even the uber-conservative WMO concluded the evidence for acceleration was unequivocal - 2 years ago ffs.

Zeke catches up only 2 years after the uber-conservative WMO declared the evidence for acceleration was unequivocal. 'Is global warming accelerating?' He muses. Really ffs.

Why does everyone remain so f*cking calm?

@ghostpanther.bsky.social
@weareyellowdot.bsky.social

www.levernews.com/remaining-ca...

Big part of the reason is the determination of the IPCC and most senior scientists not to cause alarm, on the psychologically-stupid premise this could cause inaction. Inevitably this has instead contributed to most people having no idea how bad things are - and inappropriate levels of calm.

Who could Jim and Mike possibly be?! 🤔 😂

Well yes, those of us with the privilege of both the time and enough P/G education can understand the problems with the IPCC. But it's their job to make the truth about climate-change accessible to all - and they are wilfully failing to do so.

As for your use of the word 'conservative' to describe the IPCCs failure to advise humanity about how urgent and serious the situation really is, and what meaningful action therefore needs to look like - it's not 'conservative' at all, it's negligent and it's reckless on a scale never seen before.

You didn't read Michael Mann claim we were at +1.1'C in article in 'The Hill' i.e. addressed to the public, in December 2023? To name one of literally countless examples. You're either turning a blind eye or being deliberately obtuse - either way doesn't help.