no thanks, not really what i'm going for
05.03.2026 00:55 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0no thanks, not really what i'm going for
05.03.2026 00:55 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Anyway this is my obsession with bottle episodes/fishbowls, contrived plots, and putting ordinary people in super sexually charged scenarios that they have to navigate with mutual embarrassment
all coming to a crystallized point
In many ways, an obvious eventuality
Expect to see more of them soon!
She's not being paid to fuck him but they both know why his rich old parents set this up
and there's mutually awkward tension/embarrassment and they're both sort of apologetic to the other about it but sooner or later things are going to get a little too intimate and a little too comfortable
It's a pretty standard setup where two people are secluded together to encourage a sexually charged atmosphere
What makes it stick in my brain is here, that's the *point* and both characters know it
There is the overt, stated, understood expectation of awkward incidental moments and sexual tension
All this builds up to the main event: his parents offer her an all-expense vacation, IF she takes the son.
Three months in a secluded retreat, but with the expectation the intimate, private locale might stir some things up.
He needs some "perspective" and they're just glad he found a girl he likes.
Weird parents offer to pay her, buy her things if she continues sunbathing where he can see. Think a little "life experience" might finally make him start acting like an adult. Offer to buy her a whole pool if she wears skimpy swimsuits.
Uncomfortable, but good money. And maybe she kinda likes him.
Cheetah-next-door girl sorta knows the family. Used to babysit sometimes when the son was still a kid. He's kind of obsessed with his hot, unassuming neighbor.
One day she catches him watching while she sunbathes and goes to confront him about it, but parents intercept with an indecent proposal.
There's an idea that's been bouncing around my head for weeks and i'm trying to figure out how to explain it
To start: Weird, rich, out of touch family of ponies lives next door.
Eccentric. House rules. No porn allowed.
Son was *supposed* to move out at 18 but didn't go to college, no job, no gf.
Synths and latex? Not even remotely my scene, sorry.
04.03.2026 18:37 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0i beg your pardon
03.03.2026 23:09 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Swerve: the people checking in aren't even lovers, they're like coworkers or something. But it was the only place open.
03.03.2026 20:08 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Is there a better setting for burgeoning smut than a 'fishbowl'
Characters stuck together in an enclosed, private setting really makes intimate atmosphere easy to bring up.
It's why I use "snowed in" as a premise so much.
Stuck in a hotel together. A forest lodge. A space station! Sparks will fly.
Honestly, it might be the best mascot horror game I've seen. It wasn't quite what I wanted but it was original and entertaining and had a clear vision.
The strong religious overtones felt pretty out of place but hey, the dev can do what he wants with his game
Yeah, unfortunately. Just last year there was that post that got passed around like "my vore is ethical, unlike your vore, which should never have been allowed or accepted"
Drawing lines based on disgust and having no self awareness at all
Everyone automatically sets themselves as a moral baseline
might i recommend a gameplay mechanic that's not fun and is never tied into the narrative but still requires constant attention
02.03.2026 07:57 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
I am a certified Tattletail hater and Indigo Park literally just has one chapter out
and they already went for most of the major lazy tropes so what are we defending here, Rambley himself?
has anyone ever thought of making a mascot horror game that's good
01.03.2026 21:03 — 👍 79 🔁 3 💬 17 📌 0
No payload this week! Or, well, last week. There was one but it was the pack street chapter, and that went public right away, so we don't have another lined up like we normally do
this week's payload will resume next week, sorry for the confusion
There's a lot to appreciate here. Room's very close to how I imagined it, cramped and hot. Avo's attire is even more risque than I pictured. And the brushwork's gorgeous!
But the highlight is Anna's pose and expression, they just feel so real. There's such genuine emotion in that unguarded laugh.
Anna giggles. "Nice jammies."
I take the opportunity to look her up and down a second time. "You too, girl," I smile as smoothly as I can, which probably isn't very.
Pack Street's back alright!!
Story by @tgweaver.bsky.social
People shouldn't have to self-censor because somewhere out there a hypothetical individual who can't tell reality from fantasy might take it the wrong way. Even the safest and least suggestive media has, in the past, been used to justify or inspire heinous acts. It's not your responsibility.
28.02.2026 17:02 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
I feel like the opposition position comes from a perspective of "I am the only person with an interior life and everyone else is just hollow vessels who will fill up with whatever they see", like nobody has a filter, or can interpret things.
It's literally the "GTA makes murderers" argument, again.
Back in the day I had a modded PS2 and a rent-by-mail game subscription service that charged by the month rather than the game so I was constantly cycling titles, burning them to disc, and trading them back
Tons of games I never would've touched otherwise. Downside is I never finished many.
*Generally* they're not diegetic swaps.
I love drawing genderswaps so my initial premise with this setting was that anyone could be any sex or gender depending on what best fit what I was drawing at the moment.
But there's a lot of magic so they can all get swapped "mid-episode" too, for sure
Art? That's pedophilia. Being queer? That's pedophilia. Being straight and cis and doing drag? That's pedophilia.
The soulless elite that rule us trafficking real children for fucking decades and writing "loved the torture video"?
A million op-eds of "no actually that doesn't count and it's fine"
The only people who think pedophiles should run free are the pedophiles in the seats of power who run child trafficking parties and won't ever answer for it.
Coincidentally, they're the ones who get to draw the line, not you.
And they're drawing it to include all queer people.
from now on i'm only drawing forbidden love
27.02.2026 21:33 — 👍 550 🔁 69 💬 11 📌 0
Porn and kink used to be a progressive issue.
I say it still is.
I say be a weird little freak.
The man is gonna call you one regardless.
Like it'll eat the bad vore, but not the vore you like. It'll crush ferals but not furries. Abuse, but not my wholesome queer relationship comic. You think the country with sodomy laws still on the books will distinguish??
*Entartete Kunst* is here and it doesn't fucking care! We're all degenerate!