"The Corporations don't intrinsically have souls, but they've got rights. The only corpo that contained a soul was Costco - the only one born with a soul. The Chamber of Commerce was empty, you see. These things are just vessels. That's why I'm going to destroy them. Because I hate them."
26.02.2026 23:36 โ
๐ 1765
๐ 521
๐ฌ 5
๐ 2
sweet, balanced, fruity
21.02.2026 02:35 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
spellshapers have aged like a fine wine with new mechanics
17.02.2026 17:08 โ
๐ 2
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Dawnstrider
{1}{G}
Creature โ Dryad Spellshaper
{G}, {T}, Discard a card: Prevent all combat damage that would be dealt this turn.
Morningโs mists can hide many things.
1/1
my goat right here, she fogs with the best of them
17.02.2026 17:02 โ
๐ 5
๐ 1
๐ฌ 2
๐ 0
mr. x (re2 remake) coded
16.02.2026 15:58 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
it's a weird move to make a public announcement quitting the cag saying you don't support what the rc did and saying on a multimillion sub yt channel that the previous reaction is "what they should have expected" and that kind of tantrum would be disqualifying for the format panel but what do i know
14.02.2026 14:37 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
sadly rhystic study uhhh.... *checks notes* has financial value so they cannot ban it at this time without first consulting the shareholders
12.02.2026 19:59 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
you wouldn't get any disagreement from me ๐
11.02.2026 21:36 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
and going next is certainly an option but if that's the 50% of my magic a month, that is easily grounds for finding a new hobby, plus scooping immediately after a rhystic lands is generally seen as in poor taste for the reasons of "what if someone has removal/etc", it's lose lose
11.02.2026 21:35 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
the thing is if someone has enough time for one to two games of edh every few weeks or so, and it's decided bc they picked a mono red deck, mulled to 5 and the person who went first slammed a rhystic, and their opponents either didn't have removal or didn't pay, that is a miserable scenarios
11.02.2026 21:32 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 2
๐ 0
it removing from the graveyard as part of the cost also means you can't respond to save your creatures getting eaten, very funny
09.02.2026 13:47 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
you're a cool guy do not define yourself by comparisons to other people
06.02.2026 15:50 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
Be kind to your elders, Lily x Chun Li
20.01.2026 15:53 โ
๐ 5040
๐ 1143
๐ฌ 52
๐ 13
idk i try to exclusively shit at work so i can get paid to shit
13.01.2026 00:07 โ
๐ 2
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
my local taco bell being open 24 hours feels sinful, like every time i place an order at 3:30 am i have just stabbed the omelas child
10.01.2026 08:59 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
peakpong
03.01.2026 00:16 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
hand exercises and avoiding stuff is possible too/depending they can have stuff like shots/etc to figure it out, all is not entirely lost
02.01.2026 09:05 โ
๐ 2
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
archidekt.com/decks/108116...
Mono white, ez ๐
27.12.2025 02:13 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
special shoutouts to incinerator of the guilty in that group btw, costs less than a dollar and is essentially just balefire dragon, card is nuts
26.12.2025 14:52 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
the only draw to it being below freezing is that the family who keeps the unleashed pitbull outside in my neighborhood has to keep it inside
17.12.2025 01:50 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Hansk, Slayer Zealot
{2}{R}{G}
Legendary Creature โ Human Archer
At the beginning of your upkeep, target opponent creates three Walker tokens. (Theyโre 2/2 black Zombie creatures.)
{T}: Hansk, Slayer Zealot deals 2 damage to target creature.
Whenever a Zombie an opponent controls dies, draw a card.
not quite premodern but i have reap plus another regrowth in this deck and it is insane all on it's own
12.12.2025 17:44 โ
๐ 2
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
that is correct yes
09.11.2025 18:49 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
especially when it comes to comparing to other people too, sometimes play styles just factor in, like i play in a very polarizing way when i play games so it's hard to use the "i did better therefore they are shit" mentality when i might have just high rolled, so if you can approach it with empathy
03.11.2025 13:43 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
it's tough! it's hard to see yourself objectively in competition and it's often the most validating thing in a competitive setting but it's important to zoom in to well made individual decisions, some of my best "results" were the product of things that weren't under my control when i competed so
03.11.2025 13:40 โ
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
i've done it twice now and haven't looked back since
30.10.2025 22:49 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
assassin's creed i'm assuming did poorly and despite me constantly loving individual cards designs, having a group of niche players of the largest paper format like the cards is a great way to not sell product, which ofc is sadly the goal, not making a better game ๐
17.10.2025 13:30 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
i think the problem is as much as i fully agree (most of the egregious annoying shit is at common), from wotc's perspective (๐คฎ i know), you're losing the people who draft and the people who just want to keep competitive in standard. too many different things pulling too many ways sadly
17.10.2025 13:30 โ
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0